On Wednesday, January 9, 2013 9:46:09 AM UTC-8, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
wrote:
>
> On 9 January 2013 11:23, Volker Braun >
> wrote:
> > * Sage needs something better than mq now, not "when its finished"
>
> "Now" is probably "very soon". Mercurial is being used and developed
> heavily by Faceb
On Feb 17, 5:50 pm, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> The wiki pages are there so that people can rapidly update information
> on how to install Sage for various platforms. The information in the
> Installation Guide is meant to be stable and rather general. One
> place is for rapid update, the other for lon
On Feb 17, 4:17 pm, Minh Nguyen wrote:
...
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Kelvin Li wrote:
...
> >http://wiki.sagemath.org/DownloadGuide
> >http://wiki.sagemath.org/DownloadAndInstallationGuide
> >http://boxen.math.washington.edu/sage/src/README.txt
> >http://sa
Should the following resources be consolidated?
http://wiki.sagemath.org/DownloadGuide
http://wiki.sagemath.org/DownloadAndInstallationGuide
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/sage/src/README.txt
http://sagemath.org/doc/installation
It seems there is duplicate information floating around. I think t
On Aug 13, 2:35 am, slelievre wrote:
> 2011/8/9 Jeroen Demeyer :
>
> > I would also shorten "Reported upstream. Developers acknowledge bug." to
> > "Developers acknowledge bug." and the same for "Developers deny it's a
> > bug" even though that wording is not ideal (but personally I'm not
> > conv
On Jul 30, 5:25 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> Soon I will make it so that you can just have a non-colored plain text
> box, or toggle between the fancy and non-fancy editors.
That would be cool!
> > For interacts, looks like "input_grid" and "color_selector" widgets
> > have problems. To reproduce:
Wow, this is really neat!
Out of laziness/incompetence to do any deeper investigation, I will
list my complaints in no particular order. :-)
The syntax highlighting is really cool, but when there is a lot of
text, scrolling through it with the arrow keys can be slow/jerky (at
least in my browser:
On Jun 20, 2:01 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
> Escaping a word is one solution, but to be honest I don't see anything wrong
> with what I did, which is to provide a link to a description of what a complex
> number is. Especially for more complicated terms, this would actually be
> useful
> to so
On Jun 17, 3:39 am, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
>
> I did create it. There was some page on the Wiki which linked to it, but the
> link was broken. So I just created the link. I could not be bothered to
> explain
> what a complex number is, so just put a couple of links and left it as that.
>
> Fee
On Jun 16, 3:05 pm, Keshav Kini wrote:
> I would say no, but it looks like it was created by David Kirkby, who
> generally is someone who knows what he's doing...
... which is exactly what puzzles me, too. :-)
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe
Is there any reason for this wiki page to exist?
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/wiki/ComplexNumber
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this gro
> - It would be good to choose once for all a strategy: either to have
> a full linux distro, and expect the user to use firefox within the
> virtual machine (as for 4.6), or to have a text-only linux distro,
> and expect the user to connect to the notebook server from its
> Windows br
> > > As for Trac, would it bother people (e.g. Dr.
> > > David Kirkby, who was/is involved in a lot of those tickets) if they
> > > get a bunch of junk emails saying that the ticket descriptions are
> > > changed? Also, there are some references in ticket comments, and I
> > > don't know whether t
On May 23, 10:32 pm, William Stein wrote:
> Hi Kelvin,
>
> Thanks for tracking this down. Is there any chance you could try to
> fix all the references you find to not point to sagetrac, but instead
> to trac.sagemath.org? That would be greatly appreciated.
>
> -- William
I can try the Wiki. A
On May 23, 9:13 pm, Kelvin Li wrote:
> 2. Thirty-one Trac tickets (I did a Trac search, then manually picked
> out the ones that have the bad URL)
> #8115, #7048, #7047, #7044, #7043, #7041, #7040, #7039, #7038, #7037,
> #7036, #7035, #7034, #7033, #6532, #6528, #6136, #5891,
On May 23, 8:39 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 5/23/11 1:06 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > Is anybody seriously opposed to me *not* renewing the DNS registration
> > for "SAGETRAC.ORG"?'
>
> I had no idea that sagetrac.org existed. +1 for keeping sage project
> stuff under "sagemath.org" w
Please excuse me for pulling the subject of this discussion back to
what I think the original post meant...
On May 19, 2:47 am, Ari wrote:
...
> I am working with sage
> from the terminal and whenever I use the function plot3d, nothing
> happens.
...
> Ari
As far as I know, the usual "jmol" and
On May 14, 2:07 pm, Volker Braun wrote:
> The virtual machine is really only useful on modern hardware with at
> least 4GB ram and hardware virtualization support (Intel VT-x or AMD-V).
My personal experience differs. I have run windows VMware guests with
512 MB of memory on top of old hardware (
> > > probably VMWare requires a slightly different directory layout:
> > > http://gvaro.wordpress.com/2010/05/07/vmware-player-error-“failed-to-open-
> > > virtual-machine-failed-to-query-source-for-information-”/
> > >
> > > (don't know if Bing (ahem...) can find this link though :-))
That was o
On May 13, 8:15 am, Volker Braun wrote:
> I wrote a script to create a virtual machine with Sage and export it as an
> OVA appliance. I'm using VirtualBox but I think VMware should support it,
> too. At this point it would be useful if people could try it out on a
> variety of host machines.
Func
On Apr 23, 10:44 am, Benjamin Jones wrote:
> The `symbolic_inverse` function you posted on ask.sagemath looks good.
> I might suggest catching the RuntimeError when no roots are found and
> raising a more informative error, e.g. "Sage could not find a symbolic
> inverse" ...
I am thinking about d
On Apr 23, 1:22 am, Kelvin Li wrote:
> On Apr 14, 1:09 pm, Kelvin Li wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 14, 1:03 am, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>
> > > Hi Kelvin,
>
> > > On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
>
> > > Kelvin Li wrote:
> >
On Apr 14, 1:09 pm, Kelvin Li wrote:
> On Apr 14, 1:03 am, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi Kelvin,
>
> > On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
>
> > Kelvin Li wrote:
> > > Is anybody working on implementing something similar to mathematica&#
On Apr 14, 1:03 am, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> Hi Kelvin,
>
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
>
>
>
> Kelvin Li wrote:
> > Is anybody working on implementing something similar to mathematica's
> > InverseFunction? Or is there already a trac ticket out
Currently, windows porting efforts are focusing on porting to Cygwin.
One of the targets for the Sage-5.0 release is a successful port to
Cygwin. Here is a page with some good info:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/wiki/CygwinPort
I am not involved in the project myself. Someone else with more
Hello Sage Devs!
Is anybody working on implementing something similar to mathematica's
InverseFunction? Or is there already a trac ticket out there? If there
is interest and it is not on trac, I can open a ticket.
Here is the link to mma's docs on InverseFunction:
http://reference.wolfram.com/ma
26 matches
Mail list logo
