Re: [sage-devel] Re: Installing Sage as a daemon to run under mediawiki

2013-12-04 Thread John W. Foster
I am & have been reading & tryinfg the instructions on both of those sites. So far I have been unsuccessful; There are 2 main issues. 1. the scripts that are in use on the alpha & other sites are not available. 2. The server site I have set up is a VPS server on a remotely hosted hardware system. I

Re: [sage-devel] Installing Sage as a daemon to run under mediawiki

2013-12-04 Thread John W. Foster
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 10:59 -0800, William Stein wrote: > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:22 AM, John W. Foster wrote: > > I am aware that this is a reach and as I've stated here before: I am not > > a mathematician. I am developing a website that runs Mediawiki. I have > >

[sage-devel] Installing Sage as a daemon to run under mediawiki

2013-12-04 Thread John W. Foster
I am aware that this is a reach and as I've stated here before: I am not a mathematician. I am developing a website that runs Mediawiki. I have Sage installed & running. I'm have a real issue getting the proper settings for it to work with a web call from the mediawiki system. I need to be able to

[sage-devel] Web site installation question

2013-11-25 Thread John W. Foster
Been a few years since I looked at Sage & it has progressed well. I have compiled a sage system on a remote server running Debian OldStable. All "seems" to be OK. but since I have no other way to test it than by activating it in a web browser...I'm a bit lost. The site is a fully functioning Media

Re: [sage-devel] Test compile of sage-5.1.rc1 successful

2012-07-09 Thread John W. Foster
Jan: I did as you suggested & restarted the compiling process on my system. I did have to restart it 2 times to get it to finish, but I do have it running now and it appears fine. I will be testing it out and look forward to the final release. Thanks for the tip on restarting the compile. I now ne

Re: [sage-devel] Bug in DiGraph.is_isomorphic?

2012-07-09 Thread John W. Foster
On Sun, 2012-07-08 at 06:49 -0700, Timo wrote: > G.is_isomorphic(H) I'm not a mathematician but I was able to reproduce your sage results with the new sage-5.1.rc1 that I just built. I was looikng for some input to test the build so thought I might try this. Thanks frosty -- -- To post to this g

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Please test sage-5.1.rc1

2012-07-07 Thread John W. Foster
On Sat, 2012-07-07 at 10:50 +0200, Jan Groenewald wrote: > Hi, > > On 6 July 2012 23:03, John Foster wrote: > > So, please build sage-5.1.rc1 and report unexpected > problems, especially > if you have an unusual system. Downloads at: >

Re: [sage-devel] Sage (tm)

2012-06-01 Thread John W. Foster
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 09:05 +0300, Martin Albrecht wrote: > Hi, > > I am usually quite hesitant to add more layers of law (or lawyers) to how we > interact, but I have to admit that I cannot predict the fallout from doing > something like this. > > Perhaps to understand things better, let's sa

Re: [sage-devel] Sage (tm)

2012-06-01 Thread John W. Foster
Some thoughts from a 'User': These type of decisions result is 'situations' that affect anyone who wants to be able to use Sage as well as the developers. I am voicing my opinion as a 'USER' not as a developer and therefore have a vested interest from that perspective. I have & intend to maintain a

Re: [sage-devel] Re: please complain

2012-05-31 Thread John W. Foster
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 20:01 -0700, William Stein wrote: > On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On 2012-05-28, Alex Ghitza wrote: > >>> On Sun, 27 May 2012 at 10:48AM -0700, William Stein wrote: > If you think this abuse of sagetrac.org sucks, please consider filing >

Re: [sage-devel] please complain

2012-05-29 Thread John W. Foster
On Sun, 2012-05-27 at 10:48 -0700, William Stein wrote: > Hi, > > Here's what happens when you don't renew a domain name. Somebody gets > the domain, copies your site, but then makes the page slowly > degenerate into spam! http://www.sagetrac.org/ > > The company that rents this domain name is: