Re: [sage-devel] Re: New contributor experience

2019-07-09 Thread Jerry James
on for other languages can be installed with "sudo dnf install sagemath-doc-XX" for suitable values of XX (ca, de, fr, hu, it, pt, ru, and tr). Regards, Jerry James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe

[sage-devel] Re: New contributor experience

2019-07-06 Thread Jerry James
oint, I am already set up to use git trac, so I will continue down that path. Thank you for the reply! Regards, -- Jerry James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving ema

[sage-devel] New contributor experience

2019-07-05 Thread Jerry James
t pull requests and worked my way through the rest of the guide. I filed trivial ticket 28124 just to make sure I understand the workflow before moving on. It would be great if the bit about pull requests could be clarified, though. If that really works, that would make submitting patches

Re: [sage-devel] Re: FriCAS and Sage Math v8.1 Ubuntu package

2018-11-14 Thread James Womack
lable via the distribution package manager? I think this is how TeX Live works on Debian/Ubuntu. There are a number of packages which group together optional TeX Live components, such as fonts. On Tuesday, 13 November 2018 16:54:07 UTC, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Tue, 13 Nov 201

[sage-devel] Re: FriCAS and Sage Math v8.1 Ubuntu package

2018-11-13 Thread James Womack
Thank you. I suspect you are right. I am right to think that installing packages in this way requires that I have compiled Sage Math from source? In that case, I may need to switch from the binary version in the Ubuntu repositories back to compiling from source. James On Tuesday, 13

[sage-devel] FriCAS and Sage Math v8.1 Ubuntu package

2018-11-13 Thread James Womack
I am using Sage Math installed from the Ubuntu 18.04 LTS repositories (https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=sagemath). I was previously using Sage Math v8.1 installed from source, but when I upgraded to 18.04 LTS opted for the easier to install and update package. I'm a bit puzzled becau

[sage-devel] Re: Error installing sage, with R 3.4.3

2018-05-16 Thread James Barry
:57 PM UTC+1, James Barry wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> today I tried installing sage, I am running Ubuntu 17.10 and already have >> anaconda installed, though I have not installed R before. >> >> It might be anaconda that breaks the installation somehow. Namely,

[sage-devel] Re: Error installing sage, with R 3.4.3

2018-05-16 Thread James Barry
That could work. Dumb question, but should I be able to launch sage from anywhere, ie on the command line? It seems like I have to navigate to the sage folder first... On Wednesday, 16 May 2018 16:29:44 UTC+2, Samuel Lelievre wrote: > > If you don't specifically need R functionality, > just use

[sage-devel] Error installing sage, with R 3.4.3

2018-05-16 Thread James Barry
Hello, today I tried installing sage, I am running Ubuntu 17.10 and already have anaconda installed, though I have not installed R before. The sage installation worked well except for the R part, see attached log file. I have tried opening sage and it works. What to do? Best regards, James

[sage-devel] Re: Possible bug in gen_legendre_P (associated Legendre polynomials)

2018-03-27 Thread James Womack
ed Legendre functions, they don't always end up > being polynomials, as you can see from the formulas which I showed earlier > in this thread. > > On Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 8:49:16 AM UTC-7, James Womack wrote: >> >> Thanks. If that is the case, th

[sage-devel] Re: Possible bug in gen_legendre_P (associated Legendre polynomials)

2018-03-22 Thread James Womack
Thanks. If that is the case, then presumably this *is* a bug in Sage Math and Func_assoc_legendre_P should distinguish the special cases for n == m when x > 1 or x < 1 when evaluating associated Legendre polynomials. Would you be able to clarify the distinction between Ferrers functions of the

[sage-devel] Re: Possible bug in gen_legendre_P (associated Legendre polynomials)

2018-03-22 Thread James Womack
Thanks. I am waiting for an account on Sage trac, then I will submit a bug report. On Thursday, 22 March 2018 10:25:06 UTC, Samuel Lelievre wrote: > > Ralf wrote: > > Thanks, > > P.S. Still someone should contact DLMF with the right arguments. > > I just emailed them with cc to sage-devel. > --

[sage-devel] Possible bug in gen_legendre_P (associated Legendre polynomials)

2018-03-21 Thread James Womack
I would appreciate some help with determining whether I have found a bug, or am simply misusing or misunderstanding some code. I am using the gen_legendre_P function (an instance of Func_assoc_legendre_P from sage/functions/orthogonal_polys.py) to evaluate associated Legendre polynomials in Sag

[sage-devel] Re: Error while making sage 8.1 from source (Windows 10/Cygwin64)

2017-12-28 Thread James Lee
Thanks, Emmanuel, for your reply. I posted a similar question on sage-devel, mentioning that I use an Anaconda Python distribution, to increase my chances of getting help. -James On Thursday, 28 December 2017 07:49:38 UTC-8, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > > You seem to have used a

[sage-devel] Error while making sage 8.1 from source (Windows 10/Cygwin64)

2017-12-28 Thread James Lee
un 'make' again, the build > directory will, by default, be deleted. Set the environment variable > SAGE_KEEP_BUILT_SPKGS to 'yes' to prevent this. > > make: *** [Makefile:18: all] Error 1 > Any suggestions to get past this problem would be greatly appreciated.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: error installing top com

2016-08-19 Thread James Khan
Hi! This is awesome! thanks so much! That seemed to be the problem! It's fixed now! Thanks!! J. On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:45 AM, leif wrote: > Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2016-08-19 04:16, James Khan wrote: > >> Hi! > >> > >> Many thanks for y

Re: [sage-devel] Re: error installing top com

2016-08-18 Thread James Khan
m" if that helps? thank you for your help, James On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:13 PM, leif wrote: > James Khan wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Thanks a lot for getting back promptly! Sorry it's an old post; I was > > just getting desperate and was googling. :) Would

Re: [sage-devel] Re: error installing top com

2016-08-18 Thread James Khan
18, 2016 at 12:58 PM, leif wrote: > James Khan wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Thanks for pointing this out. I am having the same problems! > > > > I have the most recent version of SAGE (7.2) > > FWIW, the most recent version is Sage 7.3, released a couple of da

[sage-devel] Re: error installing top com

2016-08-18 Thread James Khan
Hi! Thanks for pointing this out. I am having the same problems! I have the most recent version of SAGE (7.2) and I have tried all the combinations suggested in this thread: TOPCOM, topcom, download the bz2 and plaving in /upstream/ but still no luck. I wonder why this is the case. I get the

[sage-devel] Re: Sage, django and Apache

2015-11-20 Thread James Cruickshank
Hi, First time poster. I have run into the same problem as the OP, so I wonder if there is an update to this I pretty much came up against all the same problems, although I configured apache slightly differently to use the sage version python - I set it up so that Django is run in daemon mode,

[sage-devel] Profiling Advice

2015-06-16 Thread James Campbell
d, what would be the best way to compare them? (again, within the Sage source code) Thanks James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-deve

[sage-devel] Re: Hoping to develop Game Theoretical capabilities in to Sage

2014-06-02 Thread James Campbell
> > Just wanted to introduce myself as the student who will be working Vince > this summer to implement some Game Theory into Sage. I'm really looking forward to contributing to an open source project for the first time! James -- You received this message because you are sub

[sage-devel] Re: Maxima slashdotted, Sage in comments

2012-12-15 Thread James Cloos
nse in the ±π/2 rad range (aka ±100 %-grade). It remains common in civil eng and surveying. -JimC -- James Cloos OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sa

[sage-devel] Application specific module in Sage

2012-12-01 Thread James S. Kim
If it is implemented it seems to be very useful for engineers. Numerical tools have some limit for advanced computation. Hence if sage supports for those applications, it will be highly interesting to many scientific area researchers. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

[sage-devel] Re: Debugging personal code

2009-11-16 Thread James Youngquist
On November 15, 2009 10:54:16 pm William Stein wrote: > On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 10:23 PM, kstueve wrote: > > An alternative to adding/removing/commenting out/uncommenting print > > statements through your code may be to use decorators. A decorator is > > a a function that is passed your function

[sage-devel] Debugging personal code

2009-11-15 Thread James Youngquist
Hello, I'm new at the whole python/sage thing. Is there a better way to debug pieces of code we're working on other than to insert print statements? Something where we can step through the code a line at a time or generate profiling information regarding number of times a function was call

[sage-devel] Re: cache sizes

2009-10-27 Thread James Youngquist
Ubuntu 8.10 64bit Intel Q6600 (Core2Quad) ./cache 8 0.024 7.431 16 0.050 2.085 32 0.102 2.026 64 0.251 2.465 128 0.468 1.866 256 0.557 1.192 512 1.151 2.065 1024 3.055 2.654 2048 6.898 2.258 409615.7

[sage-devel] 64 bit Solaris (x86 and SPARC)

2008-05-07 Thread James
I am interested in working on making Sage work with OpenSolaris (http://opensolaris.org). This is 32 or 64 bit x86 architecture at this time with SPARC in the future. I would like to help anyone that is already going down this path (since I work in the Solaris organization). Please email me off th

[sage-devel] Re: Some work on Minimal Sage in Gentoo

2007-03-17 Thread James McCaw
above. I'll make people administrators so that the alioth webpage can be modified, files added, and progress made! Great work on the gentoo packaging effort Mark. I suspect that any future efforts from either gentoo or debian packaging efforts will be of mutual benefit to each other and sage u

[sage-devel] Re: Debian package.

2006-10-19 Thread James McCaw
inuses. I'm interested in utilising debian's resources as much as possible. Over the weekend I'm planning on opening a project on alioth.debian.org to start work on this goal. Some people from debian-science mailing list, along with some from this list, have expressed an in