Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.0.rc0 released

Dima, The word "G..v..d...e" is the worst curse in the Dutch language. The first three letters needs no translation. The rest translates to 'damn'. You shouldn't use it lightly. Jaap Op wo 26 apr. 2023 21:20 schreef Dima Pasechnik : > On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 8:18 PM Matthias Koeppe > wrote: >

Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: move Sage development to Github

+1 for Github Op wo 21 sep. 2022 19:23 schreef David Roe : > Dear Sage developers, > Following extensive discussion, both recently > > (prompted > by issues upgrading the trac server) and over >

[sage-devel] Re: Reviving the Annual SageMath Development Prize

Excellent idea! For me it was good in the early years of sage to contribute some code and give some financial support in the form of the Spies Prize. I'm not in the position now to lineup as a donor, but I probably will for the 2022 version. Best regards, Jaap Spies On Wednesday, Apr

[sage-devel] **WARNING** /var/cache/sympow/datafiles/le64 yields insufficient permissions

t --long --warn-long 129.3 --random-seed=0 src/sage/modular/abvar/abvar.py # 1 doctest failed Cheers, Jaap Spies -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

Re: [sage-devel] Making Sagemath available to Raspberry Pi

On Sunday, July 12, 2020 at 11:21:15 PM UTC+2, Jaap Spies wrote: > > Instructions: Go to https://www.raspberrypi.org/downloads/ > Download your Pi Imager if you want. > I use BalenaEtcher on an old windows loaptop with card reader. > I could also use another Raspbery Pi with USB

Re: [sage-devel] Making Sagemath available to Raspberry Pi

━━━┛ sage: It would be great to get it in debian and raspbian! > Dima > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 12:01 PM Jaap Spies > wrote: > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G

Re: [sage-devel] Making Sagemath available to Raspberry Pi

Instructions: Go to https://www.raspberrypi.org/downloads/ Download your Pi Imager if you want. I use BalenaEtcher on an old windows loaptop with card reader. I could also use another Raspbery Pi with USB card reader to dd the image to the SD card. My main machine has no card reader at all. So yo

Re: [sage-devel] Making Sagemath available to Raspberry Pi

have it up and running you can use an USB cardreader. Best > Dima > > >> Regards, >> >> Sverre Lunøe-Nielsen >> >> On Sunday, July 12, 2020 at 1:52:52 PM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, 10 Jul 2020,

[sage-devel] Re: Making Sagemath available to Raspberry Pi

t space in the official distro, but I plea to make >> Sagemath >> more available and known on the Raspberry Pi platform. >> >> >> >> The only thing we can do is to try getting Sagemath more visible. >> In documentation, on the website and make a binary avai

[sage-devel] Making Sagemath available to Raspberry Pi

a page of my website. The only thing we can do is to try getting Sagemath more visible. In documentation, on the website and make a binary available. (William are you here?) Jaap Spies -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To u

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Porting sagemath to Raspberry Pi OS

gt; > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 9:08 AM Jaap Spies > wrote: > > > > > > After this technicalities I reclaim my points: We need a port of > sagemath to Raspbery Pi OS. > > As far as I see, it is > https://www.raspberrypi.org/downloads/raspberry-pi-desktop/

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Porting sagemath to Raspberry Pi OS

No On Friday, July 10, 2020 at 11:22:30 AM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 10:11 AM Dima Pasechnik > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 9:08 AM Jaap Spies > wrote: > > > > > > After this technicalities I reclaim m

[sage-devel] Re: Porting sagemath to Raspberry Pi OS

After this technicalities I reclaim my points: We need a port of sagemath to Raspbery Pi OS. At least we need a binary of sagemath for Raspberry Pi OS. Jaap Spies On Thursday, July 9, 2020 at 2:31:52 PM UTC+2, Jaap Spies wrote: > > Saying Raspberry Pi is saying education. There are z

[sage-devel] Re: Porting sagemath to Raspberry Pi OS

Done. On Thursday, July 9, 2020 at 3:58:20 PM UTC+2, Matthias Koeppe wrote: > > On Thursday, July 9, 2020 at 5:31:52 AM UTC-7, Jaap Spies wrote: >> >> ... Raspberry Pi ... >> > > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29091, which adds test infrastructure > for ra

Re: [sage-devel] Porting sagemath to Raspberry Pi OS

9.2.beta4 > > Please report whether it works for you or not. > > > On Thu, 9 Jul 2020, 13:31 Jaap Spies, > > wrote: > >> Saying Raspberry Pi is saying education. There are zillion Raspberry Pi's >> out there. >> Almost all of them are running Raspbian,

[sage-devel] Porting sagemath to Raspberry Pi OS

Saying Raspberry Pi is saying education. There are zillion Raspberry Pi's out there. Almost all of them are running Raspbian, now called Raspberry Pi OS. On every raspbian system there is an implementation of Mathematica. Wolfram was clever when he decided to make Matematica available to the peopl

Re: [sage-devel] Apple on ARM

Yes. Sorry Martin. I mixed things up. Martin knows of the problem. He reacted in the thread. Jaap On Wednesday, June 24, 2020 at 11:58:14 AM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2020, 10:34 Jaap Spies, > > wrote: > >> This was me on sagerelease. S

Re: [sage-devel] Apple on ARM

See ticket: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29091 Jaap On Wednesday, June 24, 2020 at 11:34:40 AM UTC+2, Jaap Spies wrote: > > This was me on sagerelease. Starting with sage-9.1.beta1 fplll failed. > According to Bill Hart they never test on ARM. > > Jaap > > > On Wedne

Re: [sage-devel] Apple on ARM

This was me on sagerelease. Starting with sage-9.1.beta1 fplll failed. According to Bill Hart they never test on ARM. Jaap On Wednesday, June 24, 2020 at 8:21:48 AM UTC+2, tdumont wrote: > > Some weeks ago, there was a post on this list (or an other sage list) > where somebody said he succeede

Re: [sage-devel] Re: 10 years ago

Maybe you noticed that Dima did his first contribution to sage 10 years ago. Cheers, Jaap Op ma 24 feb. 2020 02:07 schreef Samuel Lelievre : > Ten years ago: > > Sage Days 20 > https://wiki.sagemath.org/daysmarseille > https://www.lirmm.fr/arith/wiki/MathInfo2010/SageDays > > was the

[sage-devel] 10 years ago

https://github.com/sagemath/website/blob/master/src/changelogs/sage-4.3.3.txt -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.c

[sage-devel] Re: Buiding sage on a Raspberry Pi 4B

seconds NOW: All test passed in 2.08 seconds ./sage -t --long src/sage/misc/weak_dict.pyx # 11 doctests failed ./sage -t --long src/sage/cpython/dict_del_by_value.pyx # 1 doctest failed On Tuesday, December 31, 2019 at 10:58:38 AM UTC+1, Jaap Spies wrote: > > > > On Monday, Decem

[sage-devel] Re: Buiding sage on a Raspberry Pi 4B

On Monday, December 30, 2019 at 11:21:34 PM UTC+1, Jaap Spies wrote: > > > > I'll make a bash script to do the tests stand alone. > > >> bash test_errors_rc1 >> err.log 2>&1 & Resume: ./sage -t --long src/sage/rings/tests.py # Killed due to s

[sage-devel] Re: Buiding sage on a Raspberry Pi 4B

Hi Dima, I don't understand what I see and I hate that. Seeing 4 CPU's producing heat, four instances of python 3 gathering CPU time. producing 0 test of 0.00s duration. There is something not OK in the Raspberry Pi system. I don't trust the memory management system at all. make ptestlong ended

[sage-devel] Buiding sage on a Raspberry Pi 4B

Why? Because it is possible. And the OS Raspbian is distributed with a version of Mathematica 12.0 First attempt was building sage-8.9. Just did a 'make' after downloading. The RPi 4 showed unstable. The little computer stalled a few times. Power off and power on. After 12 hours there was a run

[sage-devel] Re: Please test sage-5.1.rc1

Jeroen Demeyer wrote: Because many of the Sage testing machines (redhawk and all of Skynet) are down, version sage-5.1.rc1 has been tested much less than usual. So, please build sage-5.1.rc1 and report unexpected problems, especially if you have an unusual system. Downloads at: http://www.sagem

[sage-devel] Re: MathCad-like front end for Sage

David Roe wrote: On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 08:56, Dima Pasechnik wrote: On Monday, 28 November 2011 21:29:32 UTC+8, Emil Widmann wrote: On Nov 28, 11:33 am, Dima Pasechnik wrote: It's much more urgent to work on the Sage notebook, than to create yet another frontend. IMHO. Probably true.

[sage-devel] Re: Valgrind package very old

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: On 03/29/11 04:36 PM, Volker Braun wrote: I also noticed that the valgrind package is old; In particular it doesn't even compile on Fedora 14. But then its such a commonly-used tool that its already on every machine that is used for software development. The fact that nob

[sage-devel] Re: vtk

Mag Gam wrote: Has anyone compiled VTK, http://www.vtk.org/, into sage? I would like to compile this but would need some assistance and/or tips. This is very old, but it used to work: http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/jsp/SPKGS/ETS/ Somehow I lost interest, so you are mostly on your own.

[sage-devel] Re: inconsistent results for characteristic polynomial?

John Cremona wrote: On 15 June 2010 17:17, Minh Nguyen wrote: Hi folks, I appreciate the feedbacks. I have documented the definition of characteristic polynomials for graphs at ticket #9246: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9246 The immortal words of Humpty Dumpty ring through the a

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.4.4.alpha0 released

Mike Hansen wrote: Hi folks, Sage 4.4.4.alpha0 has been released. With the exception of a few more patches, I think this should be pretty close to final. On Fedora 12, 64 bit on i7 860: Build ok: -- All tests passed! Timing

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.4.1 build failures with gcc 4.4.1 on SUSE 11.2

Paul Leopardi wrote: Thanks, Georg, I moved -lm to just before -o test in the makefile for symmetrica-2.0.p5, used tar zcf to creat a replacement spkg, and the make now continues past symmetrica-2.0.p5. The make is still running. I have the following environment variables defined: SAGE64=yes SA

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.4.2.alpha0 released

Minh Nguyen wrote: Hi folks, This release of Sage 4.4.2.alpha0 is earlier than I scheduled [1]. But I have found some doctest failures that could take a while to resolve. So getting this release out early should help with resolving them. On Fedora 12, 64 bit all troubles seem far away! -

[sage-devel] Re: is the latest valgrind optional spkg at version valgrind-3.5.0.p0?

Minh Nguyen wrote: Hi folks, At ticket #7440 [1], I see that the valgrind optional spkg was upgraded to version valgrind-3.5.0.p0. However, on the Sage website page [2] for downloading optional packages, I see that the latest version available for download is valgrind-3.3.1. Is there any reasons

[sage-devel] Re: MPIR and GMP: an announcement

John Cremona wrote: On 1 April 2010 17:21, Jaap Spies wrote: Tom Boothby wrote: On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Francesco Biscani wrote: Erm, April 1st? An Australian, playing a prank? I shouldn't think they'd know how. They're such a serious bunch. I've hardly ev

[sage-devel] Re: MPIR and GMP: an announcement

Tom Boothby wrote: On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Francesco Biscani wrote: Erm, April 1st? An Australian, playing a prank? I shouldn't think they'd know how. They're such a serious bunch. I've hardly even seen Bill crack a smile, let alone laugh! You clearly didn't met him at dinner wit

[sage-devel] Re: Can a 4.3.5 be created to fix the Fedora/Mandriva/OpenSUSE build problem?

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: William was keen that a new release was made quickly to fix the issues which prevent 4.3.4 building on several linux distros. A patch is here: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8567 If that is added, Sage should build ok on these linux distros, which otherwise d

[sage-devel] Re: Bug advertisement

Alec Mihailovs wrote: Jaap, But wait! A native Windows Sage is almost there. That would be excellent! I'm not sure that cygwin would work on my 64- bit system (never tried it though.) On my ugly 64 bit system I can run 32 bit software without a problem :) Jaap Alec -- To post to th

[sage-devel] Re: Bug advertisement

Alec Mihailovs wrote: On Mar 21, 11:38 am, Ronan Paixão wrote: Also, since I'm using that ugly OS, For me, Windows 7 is beautiful! You are joking! Unfortunately, I have to use that ugly Linux most of the time when I want to use Sage. You are joking once more. But wait! A native Window

[sage-devel] Re: Annual Spies Prize Winner Announced!

Harald Schilly wrote: On Mar 21, 7:14 pm, William Stein wrote: Minh Van Nguyen is an integral part of the Sage development effort. Congratulations, and yes, that's so true !! H Thanks for updating: http://www.sagemath.org/development-prize.html Jaap -- To post to this group, send an em

[sage-devel] Re: Annual Spies Prize Winner Announced!

Florent Hivert wrote: Minh Van Nguyen is an integral part of the Sage development effort. He is awarded the 2010 Spies Development Prize in recognition of his code contributions, release management, support for new users and outstanding work on documentation. [...] To bad he went to sleep 1 ho

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.3.4 released

William Stein wrote: On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Jaap Spies wrote: Minh Nguyen wrote: Hi folks, Sage 4.3.4 was released on March 19, 2010. It is available at http://www.sagemath.org/download.html * About Sage (http://www.sagemath.org) Sage is developed by volunteers and

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.3.4 released

Minh Nguyen wrote: Hi folks, Sage 4.3.4 was released on March 19, 2010. It is available at http://www.sagemath.org/download.html * About Sage (http://www.sagemath.org) Sage is developed by volunteers and combines over 90 open source packages. It is available for download from www.

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-4.3.4 fails to build on openSuSE 11.1 x86_64.

Florent Hivert wrote: Hi, On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 02:22:20PM +, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Dima Pasechnik wrote: I suppose you can edit install-spkg in unpacked gd spkg, i.e. SAGE_ROOT/spkg/standard/gd-2.0.35.p4.spkg ans specify --with-libiconv-prefix=... in the ./configure call. Tha

[sage-devel] Re: sage-4.3.4 does not build on Mandriva 2010 64 bits

Jean-Yves Thibon wrote: Note: sage-4.3.3 did build correctly on the same machine. - [...@scriabine sage-4.3.4]$ uname -a Linux scriabine 2.6.31.12-server-1mnb #1 SMP Tue Jan 26 03:35:57 EST 2010 x86_64 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5540 @ 2.

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-4.3.4 fails to build on openSuSE 11.1 x86_64.

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Dr. David Kirkby wrote: I'm too busy to search for it, but there was a report the problem goes away if an option like ''without-freetype' was added to gd's configure script. You will need to search the recent posts to find the exact details - I don't have time to do it f

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.3.4.rc0 builds ok on Solaris 10 (SPARC)

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Robert Bradshaw wrote: [snipped] For spkgs, changes to shell scripts, etc. a it is much more important to test on a wide variety of platforms. Fortunately, most contributions are plain vanilla Python/Cython. Thanks for bringing this up, this is an example of what separa

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.3.4.rc0 released

Minh Nguyen wrote: Hi folks, This release candidate cleans up warnings resulting from building the Sage documentation. If there are no show stoppers, then this release is considered the final release candidate. Sorry, but once again the build failed: gcc -fPIC -g -I/home/jaap/downloads/sage-

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.3.4.alpha1 released!

Mike Hansen wrote: Hello all, This release should fix many of the outstanding issues on Solaris as well as some more of the combinatorics code from Sage Days 20. Source tarball: http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-4.3.4.alpha1/sage-4.3.4.alpha1.tar Binary for sage.math: http://

[sage-devel] Re: Is CMake OK for a standard spkg?

Bjarke Hammersholt Roune wrote: If Singular moves to CMake that could seriously be a pain for us, since we'll likely have to add cmake as a standard package to Sage, which will of course involves headaches. OK - thanks for the information. There would be advantages to CMake, too, e.g. it works

[sage-devel] Re: Bipartite graphs in Sage

David Joyner wrote: There was some discussion several years ago about what this should be called. I believe this term came from Richard Brualdi's combinatorial matrix theory book (I remember running down the hall to my advisor's office to look it up! :), but my memory may be inaccurate. You

[sage-devel] Re: Bipartite graphs in Sage

David Joyner wrote: There was some discussion several years ago about what this should be called. I believe this term came from Richard Brualdi's combinatorial matrix theory book (I remember running down the hall to my advisor's office to look it up! :), but my memory may be inaccurate. You

[sage-devel] Re: Bipartite graphs in Sage

Jason Grout wrote: On 02/27/2010 01:41 PM, Rob Beezer wrote: This is in the BipartiteGraph class as "reduced_adjacency_matrix()." I can't recall ever seeing this matrix given a name, so I don't know if this is how one would expect to find it. In the research for your graph theory book have yo

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.3.3 (with patches) builds on Solaris 10 (SPARC) !!!

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Jaap Spies wrote: Dr. David Kirkby wrote: I believe I have *finally* got the latest Sage (with some patches) to build on Solaris 10 (SPARC). Feel free to see at http://redstart.drkirkby.co.uk:8000/ I'd be interested if it works for others. 1+1 gives: Trac

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.3.3 (with patches) builds on Solaris 10 (SPARC) !!!

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: I believe I have *finally* got the latest Sage (with some patches) to build on Solaris 10 (SPARC). Feel free to see at http://redstart.drkirkby.co.uk:8000/ I'd be interested if it works for others. 1+1 gives: Traceback (click to the left of this block

[sage-devel] Re: Vpython?

William Stein wrote: On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Arthur Gaer wrote: William, Curt was just asking me about Vpython cause I gather some of his undergrads showed him some cool mathematical graphics utilizing it. He thinks they might use it in a CS course or two here. What's the deal with

[sage-devel] Re: Solaris port / Implement 2-isogeny descent / or Fix ???

Mike Hansen wrote: On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Jaap Spies wrote: There seems to be a lot of issues with _XOPEN_SOURCE and Solaris, see: http://bugs.python.org/issue1759169 From this discussion, it seems that we should strip out _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED _XOPEN_SOURCE _POSIX_C_SOURCE

[sage-devel] Re: Solaris port / Implement 2-isogeny descent / or Fix ???

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Robert Miller wrote: David, I don't know how important #6583 it so Sage, or how important William sees a Solaris port as important, but at the minute, these two appear to be mutually exclusive. I don't know if I agree with that. Have you tried tinkering with the build

[sage-devel] Re: c++ question related to porting sage to Open Solaris

Dima Pasechnik wrote: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6395191 It's a bug, known for 4 years, and nobody is fixing it, it seems... See: http://bugs.python.org/issue1759169 for some further reading. Jaap -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googleg

[sage-devel] Re: c++ question related to porting sage to Open Solaris

David Kirkby wrote: On 1 February 2010 19:29, Jaap Spies wrote: Jaap Spies wrote: Hi c++ experts, My C++ is a little bit rusty, so I'll ask here. Building matplotlib, pynac, scipy and scipysandbox fail in the end with A build log can be found here: http://boxen.math.washingto

[sage-devel] Re: Can one run all doctests from the GUI ?

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Dr. David Kirkby wrote: [...] However, on OpenSolaris, the issue is more severe. Both Jaap and William will confirm that the test in python for hashlib has failed. To a certain extend. I had opensll installed on Open Solaris, but more than once on different places.

[sage-devel] Re: Error building v4.3.1 on Fedora 12 (32-bit)

Gokhan Sever wrote: On Jan 24, 10:59 am, gsever wrote: Hello, Am I getting the similar error of FC12 (i686) binaries not pushed in the download section? [gse...@ccn sage-4.3.1]$ uname -a Linux ccn 2.6.31.9-174.fc12.i686.PAE #1 SMP Mon Dec 21 06:04:56 UTC 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [gse.

[sage-devel] Re: Where is the log file for the tests kept?

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: If I run ./sage -t devel where is the log file kept? In particular, where is it kept if you use a global install of Sage, and so don't have write access to any directories under $SAGE_ROOT? just do ./sage -t devel 2>&1 | tee /tmp/testdevel.log or so. Jaap I seem

[sage-devel] Re: Rips complex in Sage?

Harald Schilly wrote: On Feb 5, 6:59 pm, kcrisman wrote: This should be put on the experimental page (Harald?) because it installed fine. Ok, together with a short description text, ... but ... On Feb 5, 7:51 pm, Jaap Spies wrote: Last year I made a lot of experimental packages. They

[sage-devel] Re: Rips complex in Sage?

kcrisman wrote: On Feb 5, 5:47 am, Jaap Spies wrote: kcrisman wrote: It also says it needs Cmake Cmake 2.4.8 is actually a current experimental spkg, but Dionysos says it needs 2.6 or above. You can find one here:http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jsp/cmake-2.6.2.spkg This should

[sage-devel] Re: Rips complex in Sage?

kcrisman wrote: It also says it needs Cmake Cmake 2.4.8 is actually a current experimental spkg, but Dionysos says it needs 2.6 or above. You can find one here: http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jsp/cmake-2.6.2.spkg Jaap -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googleg

[sage-devel] Re: Supported Platforms web page is *very* out of date

Martin Albrecht wrote: On Monday 01 February 2010, Nick Alexander wrote: I think I've done a LOT for Sage - I would request you do not purposely break the PA-RISC support in MPIR, when it clearly passes all your self tests on HP-UX. I do not believe thiat is an unreasonable request. I take is

[sage-devel] Re: c++ question related to porting sage to Open Solaris

Jaap Spies wrote: Hi c++ experts, My C++ is a little bit rusty, so I'll ask here. Building matplotlib, pynac, scipy and scipysandbox fail in the end with A build log can be found here: http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jsp/tests/matplotlib_build.log I'm coming closer b

[sage-devel] Re: c++ question related to porting sage to Open Solaris

Minh Nguyen wrote: Hi Jaap, On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Jaap Spies wrote: Ok, I seem to be on the ban list of everybody? Certainly not. Not on mine. Thanks! Please help. I'm very new with OpenSolaris. But is there an OpenSolaris machine somewhere I could use to help?

[sage-devel] Re: c++ question related to porting sage to Open Solaris

Jaap Spies wrote: Hi c++ experts, My C++ is a little bit rusty, so I'll ask here. Building matplotlib, pynac, scipy and scipysandbox fail in the end with /usr/local/gcc-4.4.2/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.11/4.4.2/../../../../include/c++/4.4.2/bits/char_traits.h: In static member function ‘s

[sage-devel] Re: Should updates only be permitted with same gcc version?

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: [snipped] Fair enough. I mis understood this. But I still think we should not let someone upgrade Sage with a version different to what they used to build it. -1 I've a system wide install of sage upgraded 86 times: [r...@paix installed]# ls sage-* sage-1.5.1.2 sage-

[sage-devel] c++ question related to porting sage to Open Solaris

Hi c++ experts, My C++ is a little bit rusty, so I'll ask here. Building matplotlib, pynac, scipy and scipysandbox fail in the end with /usr/local/gcc-4.4.2/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.11/4.4.2/../../../../include/c++/4.4.2/bits/char_traits.h: In static member function ‘static int std::char_trai

[sage-devel] Re: Trac #7761 - was not integrated, despite trac says it is.

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7761 "Python 2.6.2.p4 faills to build on OpenSolaris" is a fix of mine for python. But despite being shown as merged in sage-4.3.1.alpha2, it is not in sage 4.3.1 Dave I hope someone will step forward to resolve this mess!

[sage-devel] Re: Should sage-env exit if CFLAGS is set ?

Robert Bradshaw wrote: On Jan 29, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Jaap Spies wrote: Robert Bradshaw wrote: On Jan 29, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Jaap Spies wrote: Quite a few spkg-install are a simply: python setup.py install. They fail on Open Solaris x64 if CFLAGS does not include -m64. There's no

[sage-devel] Re: Should sage-env exit if CFLAGS is set ?

Robert Bradshaw wrote: On Jan 29, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Jaap Spies wrote: Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Jaap Spies wrote: Dr. David Kirkby wrote: We know from recent discussions over sage-env and the hassles that http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7818 caused, that setting CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS

[sage-devel] Re: Should sage-env exit if CFLAGS is set ?

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Jaap Spies wrote: Dr. David Kirkby wrote: We know from recent discussions over sage-env and the hassles that http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7818 caused, that setting CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS etc globally will cause a build failure in Sage. It would therefore seem

[sage-devel] Re: Should sage-env exit if CFLAGS is set ?

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: We know from recent discussions over sage-env and the hassles that http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7818 caused, that setting CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS etc globally will cause a build failure in Sage. It would therefore seem sensible that we exit with an error message if

[sage-devel] Re: Trac #7761 - was not integrated, despite trac says it is.

Robert Miller wrote: I remember merging both of those. :) Sorry guys, my bad. Looks like once again I've spoken too soon. I guess I only merged the first fix.. At one time there were two release managers :) Jaap -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com

[sage-devel] Re: Trac #7761 - was not integrated, despite trac says it is.

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7761 "Python 2.6.2.p4 faills to build on OpenSolaris" is a fix of mine for python. But despite being shown as merged in sage-4.3.1.alpha2, it is not in sage 4.3.1 Your python-2.6.2.p5.spkg was replaced by a p5 package from Wil

[sage-devel] Re: Trac #7761 - was not integrated, despite trac says it is.

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7761 "Python 2.6.2.p4 faills to build on OpenSolaris" is a fix of mine for python. But despite being shown as merged in sage-4.3.1.alpha2, it is not in sage 4.3.1 Without setting CFLAGS=-64 and CXXFLAGS=-m64 globally Python fa

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.3.2.alpha0 test failures on Fedora 12

Gokhan Sever wrote: Hello, uname -a Linux ccn 2.6.31.9-174.fc12.i686.PAE #1 SMP Mon Dec 21 06:04:56 UTC 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux Getting many errors after ./sage -testall -- The following tests failed: sage -t "

[sage-devel] Re: Exhibit booth for 2011 joint meetings

William Stein wrote: On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 7:24 AM, kcrisman wrote: I think it would be very useful in following up to the PREP workshop as well. I think I can commit to staffing it for a significant period of time, though I do not have a funding source. If 50 people each committed $10 to t

[sage-devel] numpy and Open Solaris 64 bit

Hi, I have a patch. Numpy builds ok on Open Solaris, but ... There are a few problems in trac. There are patches on p2 and there is even a numpyp3.spkg waiting for review and inclusion. Maintainers, please solve this issues, so I can go on. I'll wait until this is sorted out. Jaap --

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE_FORTRNA on OS X.

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Jaap Spies wrote: Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Jaap Spies wrote: There is a hiatus in the spkg-install. If you only export SAGE_FORTRAN on Open Solaris with SAGE64="yes" the script picks up the wrong lib. ../lib/amd64/libgfortran is needed. That is not going

[sage-devel] Re: sage-4.3.1.rc0 released!

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Jaap Spies wrote: William Stein wrote: On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: Robert, the advantage is that it will simplify the *development* of Sage. Right now lots of stoppers seem to come from upstream packages. I also do not see a real problem

[sage-devel] Re: sage-4.3.1.rc0 released!

William Stein wrote: On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: Robert, the advantage is that it will simplify the *development* of Sage. Right now lots of stoppers seem to come from upstream packages. I also do not see a real problem with "specific versions" of packages. Somehow

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] sage -upgrade

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:21 PM, William Stein wrote: > Hi, > > WARNING: On Linux, if you do "sage -upgrade" right now, you may need to do > >  ./sage -f numpy-1.3.0.p2.spkg scipy_sandbox-20071020.p4.spkg > scipy-0.7.p3.spkg > > (or something very similar) to force rebuild of some code that depen

[sage-devel] Re: Not the best week for the Solaris port.

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Jaap Spies wrote: Dr David Kirkby wrote: From what I have read of the GNU linker documentation on the linker 'ld' http://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.20/ld/Options.html#Options there is no such flag as -m64. So I can't understand how it works. (Th

[sage-devel] Re: Not the best week for the Solaris port.

Dr David Kirkby wrote: From what I have read of the GNU linker documentation on the linker 'ld' http://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.20/ld/Options.html#Options there is no such flag as -m64. So I can't understand how it works. (There is an opton -64 on the Sun linker, but it rarely needed).

[sage-devel] Re: numpy on Open Solaris 64 bit

Jaap Spies wrote: Hi, A patched version of numpy-1.3.0 seems to build and install On Open Solaris 06/09 real 0m46.014s user 0m41.791s sys 0m2.656s Successfully installed numpy-1.3.0.p3 [...] from numpy.linalg import lapack_lite ImportError: ld.so.1: python: fatal: relocation error: file

[sage-devel] numpy on Open Solaris 64 bit

Hi, A patched version of numpy-1.3.0 seems to build and install On Open Solaris 06/09 real0m46.014s user0m41.791s sys 0m2.656s Successfully installed numpy-1.3.0.p3 You can safely delete the temporary build directory /export/home/jaap/sage_port/sage-4.3.1.rc0/spkg/build/numpy-1.3.0.

[sage-devel] Re: sage-4.3.1.rc0 released!

Robert Miller wrote: Greetings! sage-4.3.1.rc0 is finally here. This should be a good base version for Bug Days, and closes a good deal of tickets. I thought it would be good to plan on an rc1 with just the ticket to fix building on OS X 10.6 (thoughts?). Also, reverting #7818 fixed a good deal

[sage-devel] Re: mpir-1.2.2.p0 fails on centos32, debian32, and opensuse32

Robert Miller wrote: I'm not sure whether you are trying to build a 32-bit or 64-bit sage (there's nothing in prereq which clearly states one way or the other) but it looks like mpir is building all the assembler code in 64-bit mode and all the C code in 32-bit mode. That definitely isn't going

[sage-devel] Re: Sage build hangs on fplll

Robert Miller wrote: One of the patches recently merged into rc0 is causing fplll to take forever to compile on {sage, boxen...}.math: building 'sage.libs.fplll.fplll' extension gcc -DNDEBUG -g -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wall -g -Wall -g -fPIC - I/mnt/usb1/scratch/rlm/sage-4.3.1.alpha3/local

[sage-devel] Re: Error in building/installing linbox on Open Solaris 64 bit

Clement Pernet wrote: Hi, This part of the interface is actually terrible. In particular, I don't see the rationale for the use of static's here. Hopefully this will be all gone when we'll switch to have LinBox and matrix_modn_dense support use natively the same matrix type (#4258). But given y

[sage-devel] Error in building/installing linbox on Open Solaris 64 bit

There seems to be a problem with linbox-sage.C linbox-sage.C:438: instantiated from here linbox-sage.C:312: warning: unused variable ‘k’ linbox-sage.C: At global scope: linbox-sage.C:72: warning: ‘void linbox_set_modn_matrix(mod_int**, LinBox::DenseMatrix >&, size_t, size_t)’ declared ‘static’

[sage-devel] Re: mpir-1.2.2.p0 fails on centos32, debian32, and opensuse32

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Robert Miller wrote: These seem related to #7910... Any thoughts? When you say they seem to be related to #7910, what makes you think that? I realise there is a mix of 32 and 64-bit objects in those list of error messages, but I think the reasons for #7910 are pretty w

[sage-devel] Re: Linbox complains GMP is not installed on Solaris 10 (64-bit mode)

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Bill Hart wrote: There are two problems I see. 1) The invalid option -64 is passed to the compiler (I think this is being ignored anyway). 2) It links against libgmpxx, which it fails to find. It is not clear to me why. It should be in sage/loca

[sage-devel] Re: Building ATLAS libraries failed on Open Solaris

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Jaap Spies wrote: I'm almost there: Finished building ATLAS core The Makefile generated in ATLAS for building shared libraries assumes the linker is the GNU linker, which it not true in your setup. (It is generally considered better to use the Sun linker in /usr/cc

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] Re: 4.3.1.alpha2

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Jaap Spies wrote: Minh Nguyen wrote: Hi folks, On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Robert Miller wrote: I've finished merging for sage-4.3.1.alpha2, but due to... technical difficulties, the best place I can put it right now is in /scratch/r

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >