[sage-devel] Re: After doing hg_sage.ci()

2009-01-25 Thread David Møller Hansen
> If you are exporting the most recent commit (the usual case), then you > can skip the hg_sage.log() and use: > hg_sage.export('tip', patch name) Succes! Thanks guys! > Also, if you're going to be doing much Sage development (or > development with any other mercurial project) I highly recomme

[sage-devel] After doing hg_sage.ci()

2009-01-25 Thread David Møller Hansen
I have just done hg_sage.ci() in my modified branch. Is my patch then sent to the sagemath.org? At first I thought so since the modification showed up when i wrote hg_sage.serve(), but when I tried to pull in my main branch I did'nt get my patch. Was my commit only local? /David --~--~-~-

[sage-devel] Re: sage -br question

2009-01-22 Thread David Møller Hansen
button. Cheers, David On Jan 21, 5:27 pm, David Møller Hansen wrote: > > Could you be more specific about the function you wrote and how you > > tried to access it? > > Oh yes, I define the function weil_pairing in the class > EllipticCurvePoint_finite_fiel

[sage-devel] Re: sage -br question

2009-01-21 Thread David Møller Hansen
ot;Mike Hansen" wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:17 PM, David Møller Hansen > > wrote: > > I ran sage -br and it seemed to discover the changed file and build > > a .pyc from it (I guess) but when I tried to run the function from > > sage it wasn

[sage-devel] sage -br question

2009-01-20 Thread David Møller Hansen
So I tried to make my own branch and modified a file in the branch by adding a function to a class. I ran sage -br and it seemed to discover the changed file and build a .pyc from it (I guess) but when I tried to run the function from sage it wasn't there. I tried writing hg_sage.status() and go

[sage-devel] Re: EC pairing framework

2009-01-11 Thread David Møller Hansen
see http://groups.google.com/group/sage-nt/browse_thread/thread/f4354f1624eff3bc On Jan 11, 7:24 pm, David Møller Hansen wrote: > I will restart this thread in sage-nt. > > /David > > On Jan 11, 7:13 pm, "John Cremona" wrote: > > > I am interested in this.  

[sage-devel] Re: EC pairing framework

2009-01-11 Thread David Møller Hansen
spoke at the Sage Days in Nancy.  I'm not sure if > she posted that on sage-* but I think it is on trac.  Must run, > > John Cremona > > 2009/1/11 David Møller Hansen : > > > > > This is a call out to the people who is interested in getting pairings > > on

[sage-devel] Re: EC pairing framework

2009-01-11 Thread David Møller Hansen
is divided into field, number field and finite field class instances. If you place it on the class field, will it then be inherited by the number field and finite field classes? Or would you place it in each class? Thanks. /David On Jan 11, 6:51 pm, David Møller Hansen wrote: > This is a c

[sage-devel] EC pairing framework

2009-01-11 Thread David Møller Hansen
This is a call out to the people who is interested in getting pairings on elliptic curves into Sage. I have started a Ticket #4964 on getting a pairing framework into Sage. Currently I am trying to get an overview of what activity there is on this in Sage. I've browsed the TRAC server and this

[sage-devel] Re: Best way to package code written in SAGE

2008-11-17 Thread David Møller Hansen
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/11/15 Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > On Saturday 15 November 2008, David Møller Hansen wrote: > >> The pairing is 'just' a bilinear mapping of two point in a curve group > >> into

[sage-devel] Re: Best way to package code written in SAGE

2008-11-15 Thread David Møller Hansen
te: > On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:10:07 + > > > > Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Friday 14 November 2008, Burcin Erocal wrote: > > > On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 05:38:03 -0800 (PST) > > > > David Møller Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

[sage-devel] Re: Best way to package code written in SAGE

2008-11-14 Thread David Møller Hansen
artin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 14 November 2008, David Møller Hansen wrote: > > > I would really like to start such a project. > > Great! > > > But I wouldn't know the first thing on how to do so.. > > I suppose the first thing t

[sage-devel] Re: Best way to package code written in SAGE

2008-11-14 Thread David Møller Hansen
ote: > On Friday 14 November 2008, David Møller Hansen wrote: > > > I agree with the teaching and research justifying a slow > > implementation. > > > But in the not so distant future when every one is making Cython > > wrappers of their c code and placing their

[sage-devel] Re: Best way to package code written in SAGE

2008-11-14 Thread David Møller Hansen
functions "water down" the whole quality of SAGE? Is there a defined group of people to join on getting the pbc library into SAGE? /David On 13 Nov., 17:12, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:02 AM, David Møller Hansen > > <[

[sage-devel] Re: Best way to package code written in SAGE

2008-11-14 Thread David Møller Hansen
functions "water down" the whole quality of SAGE? Is there a defined group of people to join on getting the pbc library into SAGE? /David On 13 Nov., 17:12, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:02 AM, David Møller Hansen > > <[

[sage-devel] Re: Best way to package code written in SAGE

2008-11-13 Thread David Møller Hansen
just have to be fast then :-) Thank you for your advice. /David On 13 Nov., 15:28, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:03 AM, David Møller Hansen > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi > > > So

[sage-devel] Best way to package code written in SAGE

2008-11-13 Thread David Møller Hansen
Hi So I'm getting to the point in my masters thesis where I have coded some different .sage files and now I have to package it in some way making it easy to use with SAGE for my professor and the censor. I just want to explain the content of my implementation in short: It is basically a slow pai