t; Check out the hg bundle attached to this ticket:
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1136
>
> Bobby Moretti was implementing code for doing this transformation, but
> never finished due to a subtle bug in the transformation maps (he gets the
> right cubic but not the
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 8:57 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ??? Either I've got a doppelganger, I've been fixing Sage bugs in my sleep,
> or this was misattributed...
You mean you haven't seen my long red braided hair? :)
--
; > for 2D plots (e.g. something like AspectRatio->Automatic in Mma). Does
> > this exist in Sage? I'm trying to set things up so that
> >
> > circle((0,0),2).show()
> >
> > shows a circle rather than an ellipse, regardless of the plot window
> >
from bsddb.dbutils import DeadlockWrap as _DeadlockWrap
> 53 except ImportError:
>
> : libdb-4.1.so: cannot open shared
> object file: No such file or directory
>
>
> The planetplanet software requires the bsddb module. Maybe someone
> with more knowledge can res
07 12:18 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 10, 2007 12:15 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Dec 10, 2007 8:07 PM, Bobby Moretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Very cool. Now I just need to fin
quot;, so for
> planet.sagemath.org I'd mark them with "sage" and that's it. Only
> those will be visible for the respective planet.
>
> Ondrej
>
>
> >
>
--
Bobby Moretti
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~
is include:
> > >>>
> > >>>* Planet GNOME (planet.gnome.org)
> > >>>* Planet Debian (planet.debian.org)
> > >>>* Planet Twisted (planet.twistedmatrix.org)
> > >>>
> > >>> etc..You can see a more
pany/rss/index.html
> >
> > Google has a blog that they post to about once every three weeks or so.
> >
> > Obviously making the software the best it can be is a bigger priority,
> > but a blog could be useful at some point for keeping in touch with
> > people (reporters,
/SAGE_Demo.sws
>
> . Feedback is very welcome :-)
>
> William
>
> --
> William Stein
> Associate Professor of Mathematics
> University of Washington
> http://wstein.org
>
> >
>
--
Bobby Moretti
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~
sage -upgrade seems to be depending the hardcoded
absolute path.
(This is while installing libfplll)
The temporary fix was to symlink ~/sage-2.8.7 to ~/sage.
-Bobby
On 10/28/07, Bobby Moretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --
> Bobby Moretti
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Bobby M
--
Bobby Moretti
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage
ng why the javascript for the
> >>> notebook was all placed in a string rather than just a javascript
> >>> file
> >>> or straight embedding into the web pages.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for any response.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >&
On 7/29/07, Alec Mihailovs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From: "Bobby Moretti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >> Well, I wouldn't call SAGE a single program.
> >
> > The issue is complicated, and I doubt a lawyer would agree.
> >
> >
to confusion).
However, anything that is licensed under the normal GPL cannot be
linked without "infecting" the main program, be it a library, program,
snippet of code, etc...
See
http://clisp.cvs.sourceforge.net/*checkout*/clisp/clisp/doc/Why-CLISP-is-under-GPL
for more details on this
r
> programs under separate licenses.
gmp is licensed under the GNU LGPL, which is GPL without the linking
requirements, so Maple can do what they want, as long as they don't
modify GMP. If they modify GMP, then they have to publish their
changes under the LGPL, but they can leave the maple
e (or if you would like to volunteer some writing).
> >
> > > > We could create a new manual, similar in format to the "SAGE
> > > > Tutorial", "SAGE Reference
> > > > manual", etc., but instead entitled "SAGE Overview". This
s to me
that if I'm multiplying something symbolic by something approximate, I
don't want to see anything symbolic in the result, since my result is
inherently limited by the approximation. It's less clear in the case
of addition.
I think ultimately we will need to get feedback from
On 6/1/07, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday 31 May 2007 20:24, Bobby Moretti wrote:
> > This is an example of trying to err on the side of being overly correct
> for
> > our output. For example, if you input
> >
> > sage: sqr
arsing data that is output by Maxima,
> > > or with how maxima is interpreting something we give it.
> > > The only way to fix this is for you to post an example.
> >
> > Right, I'll try and capture the bug on a more manageable chunk of data.
> >
> > --
> &
# HG changeset patch
# User Bobby Moretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
# Date 1179852649 25200
# Node ID 5d423d8161906a30efe1b6837524724737303db2
# Parent 82e2148257968030ef5a6d2a5ee415aaf0927f28
implemented SR.numerical_approximation()
diff -r 82e214825796 -r 5d423d816190 sage/calculus/calculus.py
t = ... in feet or meters? (I say meters)
that's what google's calculator does.
This is going on quite a tangent, but I think it would be interesting to
try:
sage: a = 1*meters + 2*feet; a
2*meters + 2*feet
sage: meters(a)
1.6096 * meters
~Bobby
--
Bobby Moretti
[EMAIL PR
gt; >
> > Is that a bad idea?
>
> Global namespace pollution? Would the (implicit) target audience of
> degree-based trig know to look for sindeg, etc.? Would it work like
>
> sage: cosdeg(45)
> cos(pi/4)
>
> It's much be
ill not know this already. We could
give them a shortcut for things like symbolic expressions, but tell them how
it works, in general, via the docstring. Easing people in is could be a good
thing.
~Bobby
--
Bobby Moretti
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post
ocid=-288473283307306160&esrc=sr4&ev=v&q=alex+martelli&vidurl=http://video.google.com/videoplay%3Fdocid%3D-288473283307306160%26q%3Dalex%2Bmartelli&usg=AL29H20cMNMT79toLLPEBtQIbRNl7Z86-w
--
Bobby Moretti
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To
n't using
any processor cycles.
~Bobby
On 5/8/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On May 9, 5:40 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'm seeing a lot of lisp.run processes on sage.math -- Bobby Moretti
> seems to
> > own all them right n
modified
> > > >
> > > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/rc/web/
> > > >
> > > > based on many people's extensive (and greatly
> > > > appreciated!) feedback.More feedback would be
> > > > appreciated, though I think
> > which is y == -6/4*x + 3/2?
>
> I don't have a good plan yet. Thought out suggestions for an
> implementation
> strategy are welcome. Please email the list. This will be after
> sage-2.5 is released though.
>
> William
>
> >
>
--
Bobby Moretti
[
nice for when I need to
just test a couple simple lines. The attachment method I use occasionally,
since for me, writing long pieces of code in the notebook is annoying
(indentation is a pain).
~Bobby
--
Bobby Moretti
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
T
:Wed Jan 17 23:20:27 2007 -0800
summary: Reverted Bobby's font change patch since those fonts suck for
me (weird spacing issue
s, etc.)
--
Bobby Moretti
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@goog
n the program to standard output for some time to check it, before
piping it to a file. So I think it was behaving, but one can never
know.
Bill.
>
--
Bobby Moretti
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@goo
we
> >> make no assumptions other than a relatively modern browser. Is this too
> >> much of an obstacle?
> >>
> >
> > I don't know. I'd like to get feedback from more people. Already
> > requiring
> > JAVA is an obstacle, but
uch on tut yet
> but I put a copy in
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wdj/patches/tut.tex
> of what I did do. I have an early morning final tomorrow so won't have much
> time for it anyway.
>
> >
>
--
Bobby Moretti
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~
g it.
~Bobby
On 12/7/06, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Bobby: Here is a very rough draft - a starting point at least. - David
>
>
> SEP
> Authors - Bobby Moretti, David Joyner
>
> Preamble -- Functions for calculus
>
> Abstract -- A Python class
On 12/7/06, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 04:30:28 -0800, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On 12/7/06, Bobby Moretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On 12/7/06, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
On 12/7/06, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Could somebody volunteer to write up a "SAGE Enhancement Proposal"
> for Calculus functions based on all the discussion on this list
> during the last 48 hours? Alex? Bobby? David? Joel?
>
ap the external object formally).
> >
> > Basic functions: all functions like sin, cos, exp, special funcs,
> > etc, will be defined as formal functions - a lot of this is already
> > done.
> >
--
Bobby Moretti
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~
this subtlety will likely be lost on most SAGE users.
Extensive knowledge of computer programming is not required in order
to use SAGE. I hope we can come up with a solution that is acceptable
in both paradigms. Perhaps the solution that Math/Maple/etc. use is
the best, but I hope we can find a m
r SAGE's calculus interface to be immediately
available to Mathematica and Maple users with no learning curve, it is
just as important that we minimize the learning curve for someone who
knows calculus, but may not know any computer algebra language.
It's been a while since I've use
Wolfram Research, Inc.
> -- Terminal graphics initialized --
>
> In[1]:= f := Sin[x];
>
> In[2]:= f[2];
>
> In[3]:= f[2]
>
> Out[3]= Sin[x][2]
>
> In[4]:= Integrate[f, x];
>
> In[5]:= Integrate[f,x]
>
> Out[5]= -Cos[x]
>
orming. If any of it seems useful, I'm hapy to
> put it on the wiki (or others
> can feel free to). I'm glad this discussion is going on though!
Yes, please put any ideas that you have on the wiki. Again, the page
is http://sage.math.washington.edu:9001/BasicCalculus
--
Bobby More
bove are very good, and will help inform the design
> that we come up with. Thanks! Keep 'em coming! (Could somebody please
> post something based on all this into the wiki -- I suddenly only have
> limited net access for the next few days).
Done.
--
Bobby Moretti
[EMAIL PROTECTED
like to get at the very
least a comprehensive list of guidelines and constraints to work with.
Bobby Moretti
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL
On 12/2/06, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 02 Dec 2006 11:56:33 -0800, Bobby Moretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On 12/2/06, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> We might want to pre-defi
e. Is there any way for SAGE to guess that someone is using
a given variable as an indeterminate? Possibly using the preprocessor?
That way we could define the indeterminates naturally, on the fly,
emulating how my favorite little CAS (the one that comes on the TI-89
calculators) handles it.
--
Bo
0 (PST)
> > From: David Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Sage
> >
> > This is my email. I am interested in helping the Sage Project in any way
> > possible. I was thinking documentation.
> > Dave K.
> > Im wor
the traceback.
>
> To help me debug this, could you show me an example of code
> that generates such a horendous traceback?
>
> william
>
>
This is contrived, but it generates a pretty large traceback...
def foo():
return foo()
foo()
--
Bobby Moretti
[EMAIL PROTECTED
It looks like every currently running lisp.run process has been reniced to
19. It sounds like this problem should go away after Thanksgiving and SAGE
1.5...
--
Bobby Moretti
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel
pyrecs? pyreks?psyrex?(where the s is for SAGE).Of course this would mean that we would call pyrexc pyrecsc or pyreksc which is sort of incomprehensible. This also has the disadvantage of being a homonym with pyrex. I'm trying to think of a glassware-related pun that would be appropriate...
On 11/3
David (H.):
Sorry about that... I usually monitor via top and kill things before I'm done, but I forgot that time.
I strongly agree, though. This is an extreme annoyance. There has to be
a way to minimize this problem. Having SAGE clean up after a previous
run when it starts up again would be a g
49 matches
Mail list logo
