On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 5:41 PM Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
> On 2025-04-10 12:10:07, Nathan Dunfield wrote:
> >
> > Interesting, where can I find a list of the non-python pre-reqs?
>
> "meson setup" should tell you. Some of the dependency checks it does
> are not as precise as the corresponding che
On Thursday, April 10, 2025 at 2:10:07 PM UTC-5 Nathan Dunfield wrote:
On Thursday, April 10, 2025 at 9:37:09 AM UTC-5 Dima wrote:
On 10 April 2025 07:45:09 GMT-05:00, I wrote:
>To me, a "proper Python package" is something I can install with
>"random-python -m pip install blah" that pulls a
With all non-python pre-reqs in place,
just run./bootstrap and pip to build sagelib, that's all.
No need to worry about a dodgy custom venv,
unhappy ./configure, etc.
> Interesting, where can I find a list of the non-python pre-reqs?
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/blob/871ba9daed15374
On 2025-04-10 12:10:07, Nathan Dunfield wrote:
>
> Interesting, where can I find a list of the non-python pre-reqs?
"meson setup" should tell you. Some of the dependency checks it does
are not as precise as the corresponding check from spkg-configure.m4
(it doesn't run "maxima" and parse the ve
On Wednesday, 9 April 2025 at 16:44:31 UTC-7 dim...@gmail.com wrote:
As I already explained, it's quite a stretch by Sage's standards to call
python3 package standard. Because it is not tested enough;
because few months into release, the supposedly stable Sage release is
often not installable,
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 9:55 AM Léon Vaia wrote:
>
> Thank you very much Dima.
>
> Trying to run
> sudo apt-get libffi-dev xz-utils liblzma-dev
> I get
> E: Invalid operation libffi-dev
oops, sorry, it should have been
sudo apt-get install libffi-dev xz-utils liblzma-dev
>
> Installing the d
On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 3:25 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> It's not standard - no-one nowadays builds Sage's Python, not even CI is
> doing this.
>
> This is the point I already made.
> You are the sole users of this semi-broken feature.
>
Well, it is a feature that is available by just setting one
Hi Leon,
sorry for overlooking your previous post.
In your config.log you see
real_configure:40317: checking whether any of bzip2 liblzma libffi zlib is
installed as or will be installed as SPKG
real_configure:40322: result: yes; install python3 as well
That is, one of system packages providing
On Monday, April 7, 2025 at 10:59:40 AM UTC-5 marc@gmail.com wrote:
As this discussion tries to wander off into a new discussion about the uv
project, I will attempt to bring it back on topic.
The point is this: Currently, to build the macOS binary, we first build
sage in a completely st
On Thursday, April 10, 2025 at 9:37:09 AM UTC-5 Dima wrote:
On 10 April 2025 07:45:09 GMT-05:00, I wrote:
>To me, a "proper Python package" is something I can install with
>"random-python -m pip install blah" that pulls a binary wheel off PyPI
that
>just works. If we're getting close to being
Everything works fine now, thank you very much
Il giorno martedì 8 aprile 2025 alle 17:57:09 UTC+2 dim...@gmail.com ha
scritto:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 9:55 AM Léon Vaia wrote:
> >
> > Thank you very much Dima.
> >
> > Trying to run
> > sudo apt-get libffi-dev xz-utils liblzma-dev
> > I get
>
On 10 April 2025 07:45:09 GMT-05:00, Nathan Dunfield
wrote:
>On Thursday, April 10, 2025 at 12:07:03 AM UTC-5 Dima wrote:
>
>> Probably not on the build system. But the app needs to work on *any*
>system.
>>
>>> Are you worried that sage would have trouble recognizing the python
>build as
Hello;
Has anyone considered making sage as container? This will eliminate all
these issues being discussed here, I would think.
Google AI says this:
"Container-based software delivery packages applications and their
dependencies
into lightweight, isolated environments called containers, enab
On Wednesday, April 9, 2025 at 2:58:51 PM UTC-5 Trevor Karn wrote:
At the same time, the concession that python3.spkg *can* still provide
python if really wanted helps Marc see that the MacOS app build is taken
seriously. I would expect it's a major delivery platform of sagemath
functionality t
On Thursday, April 10, 2025 at 12:07:03 AM UTC-5 Dima wrote:
> Probably not on the build system. But the app needs to work on *any*
system.
>
>> Are you worried that sage would have trouble recognizing the python
build as valid for its purposes?
>
No. Because sagelib (with meson build) is al
15 matches
Mail list logo
