On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 1:25 PM John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> For what it's worth, on my macos M2 machine, giac builds but it fails its
> test suite:
Given that macOS is a supported platform, one has to have jolly good
reasons for keeping giac standard - while it fails self-tests.
If Volker would b
#39467 eliminates
"minimal" CI testing: test building sage from source on platforms with
minimal required system packages installed. See the relevant section on our
installation guide:
https://doc-release--sagemath.netlify.app/html/en/installation/source#software-prerequisites-and-recommended-p
I am for #39467 - it finally makes our CI somewhat useful and more orientated
to the needs of Sage users, instead of spending KWts of electricity and lots of
CPU hours on testing configurations no humans use.
On 20 February 2025 05:45:08 GMT-06:00, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
>I object to the PR #39467
For what it's worth, on my macos M2 machine, giac builds but it fails its
test suite:
[giac-1.9.0.15p0] [spkg-check] PASS: chk_partfrac
[giac-1.9.0.15p0] [spkg-check] PASS: chk_factor
[giac-1.9.0.15p0] [spkg-check] PASS: chk_integrate
[giac-1.9.0.15p0] [spkg-check] PASS: chk_geo
[giac-1.9.0.15p0]
I object to the PR #39467, and prepared an alternative PR
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/39009
to restore the CI infrastructure to good shape. The PR #39009 is now ready
for review.
Please join in the discussion.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Hello everyone,
Sage Days 128 occurred last week in Le Teich near Bordeaux gathering 27
participants.
https://wiki.sagemath.org/days128
A final status report is available here:
https://codimd.math.cnrs.fr/s/-dIAr1Z2O#
More than 30 pull requests (PRs) were made during the week, including many
b
