I am for #39467 - it finally makes our CI somewhat useful and more orientated to the needs of Sage users, instead of spending KWts of electricity and lots of CPU hours on testing configurations no humans use.
On 20 February 2025 05:45:08 GMT-06:00, Kwankyu Lee <ekwan...@gmail.com> wrote: >I object to the PR #39467, and prepared an alternative PR > >https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/39009 > >to restore the CI infrastructure to good shape. The PR #39009 is now ready >for review. > >Please join in the discussion. > > > >-- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >"sage-devel" group. >To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >To view this discussion visit >https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/81574c40-f12d-4715-bdc1-416ed7c97002n%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/FEF7C191-9699-4D42-967F-7F22A11F7A1E%40gmail.com.
