Thank you, Dima. This is now https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/38745.
On Sunday, September 29, 2024 at 12:14:44 AM UTC-7 dim...@gmail.com wrote:
> how about opening a github issue to deal with the cutoff pdf picture?
>
>
>
> On 29 September 2024 07:34:14 BST, Anne Schilling
> wrote:
>
>>
On Sunday, September 29, 2024 at 5:31:15 PM UTC+9 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
Please don't fragment this discussion. It seems productive to me currently.
According to the recent survey, visitors to sage-devel seem to get tired of
lengthy technical discussions with only a few people involved. This
Please don't fragment this discussion. It seems productive to me currently.
On Sunday 29 September 2024 at 09:09:42 UTC+2 Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> I welcome this discussion on the design of modularized distribution
> packages.
>
> Perhaps Matthias has his design fixed in his plan. But I believe th
> I could also imagine to have three layers:
>
> * a core distribution with absolutely minimal dependencies and only
dependencies which have proved stable on all supported platforms
>
> This is exactly sagemath-categories. It has absolutely minimal
dependencies.
Would it make sense to gi
On 29 September 2024 01:50:39 BST, Matthias Koeppe
wrote:
>On Saturday, September 28, 2024 at 5:21:56 PM UTC-7 oscar.j@gmail.com
>wrote:
>
>On Sun, 29 Sept 2024 at 00:22, Matthias Koeppe
>wrote:
>> On Saturday, September 28, 2024 at 12:28:30 PM UTC-7 axio...@yahoo.de
>wrote:
>>
>> I
how about opening a github issue to deal with the cutoff pdf picture?
On 29 September 2024 07:34:14 BST, Anne Schilling
wrote:
>Thank you, Michael and Emanuel, for your responses.
>
>My operating system is MacOS 15.0 with sage installed from source.
>
>I have already applied ticket 38339 since
I welcome this discussion on the design of modularized distribution
packages.
Perhaps Matthias has his design fixed in his plan. But I believe the
modularization project would succeed only when many sage developers
understand and accept the design.
Hence it is crucial that we have open discus
