Re: [sage-devel] (Re-)building an inclusive SageMath community. IV: The role of focus in discussions for inclusiveness

2024-08-25 Thread Grégory Vanuxem
Hello, Le dim. 25 août 2024 à 18:42, Georgi Guninski a écrit : > I think it it clear that sage doesn't have community. > Unfortunately this scales to the real world community. >From my point of view, community can be read as « virtual » community. Like any other open source projects opened to

Re: [sage-devel] (Re-)building an inclusive SageMath community. IV: The role of focus in discussions for inclusiveness

2024-08-25 Thread Georgi Guninski
I think it it clear that sage doesn't have community. Unfortunately this scales to the real world community. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-d

Re: [sage-devel] Re: (I’m failing to build a working binary) Please provide a snapcraft package/container as now all but one Linux distributions no longer package Sagemath.

2024-08-25 Thread Marc Culler
Dear Laël, On Sunday, August 25, 2024 at 2:29:44 AM UTC-5 "Dima" wrote: CertIainly Sage does build and run on all sorts of Linux systems. But it's getting more and more bloated to support macOS, and this gets in the way of Linux. It is true that Sage builds on linux, of course. It is false t

Re: [sage-devel] Re: message marked as off topic

2024-08-25 Thread Dima Pasechnik
I don't see how a comment related to the review procedure can be off-topic. On Friday, August 23, 2024 at 4:52:42 PM UTC+1 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > On Friday, August 23, 2024 at 7:26:38 AM UTC-7 axio...@yahoo.de wrote: > > I find it quite hard to digest that work continues on these tickets as if

[sage-devel] Re: Package upgrade PRs waiting for review

2024-08-25 Thread Dima Pasechnik
No, it is Sage the distro getting in the way of sagelib. On Sunday, August 25, 2024 at 6:52:40 AM UTC+1 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > On Friday, August 23, 2024 at 1:21:47 PM UTC-7 tobia...@gmx.de wrote: > > Why would one want to specify a more narrow version range? > > > It's not a goal, it's a tradeo

Re: [sage-devel] (Re-)building an inclusive SageMath community. IV: The role of focus in discussions for inclusiveness

2024-08-25 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Neurodivergent or not, people have trouble with contributing to SageMath due to lack of clearly set and followed goals (we cannot even agree on a new motto). It doesn't help to stay on focus in particular PR if the general focus of the project is not sharp, in the sense of lack of consensus on t

Re: [sage-devel] Re: (I’m failing to build a working binary) Please provide a snapcraft package/container as now all but one Linux distributions no longer package Sagemath.

2024-08-25 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Please post your config.log CertIainly Sage does build and run on all sorts of Linux systems. But it's getting more and more bloated to support macOS, and this gets in the way of Linux. Dima On 24 August 2024 09:54:53 BST, "Laël Cellier" wrote: >Except the latest conda binary version is sage