[sage-devel] Re: message marked as off topic

In my opinion, the decision to hide a comment should not be made by a single person. I might even suggest that the authority to make such a decision should lie solely with the Sage Code of Conduct Committee. (I am a member of that committee, but I am expressing my own views here, not those of t

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: Policy for standard packages from binary wheelsall

> Does this [platform-dependent standard package] mean that there will be different sage tarballs for supported platforms? I want to here an answer for this question. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group

[sage-devel] Re: message marked as off topic

I cannot quit, because I have duties, but I am really pissed off. You are not alone. Everyone here was offended in his own way. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, s

[sage-devel] Re: message marked as off topic

I must say that I find this response intolerable. I cannot quit, because I have duties, but I am really pissed off. Martin On Tuesday 13 August 2024 at 21:41:54 UTC+2 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > I marked Martin's message as off-topic because PR discussions are not a > place for discussions about p

[sage-devel] Re: message marked as off topic

I marked Martin's message as off-topic because PR discussions are not a place for discussions about procedure. On Tuesday, August 13, 2024 at 2:04:13 AM UTC-7 Martin R wrote: > I asked a question at https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/38219 which > was promptly labelled off topic, so I suppos

Re: [sage-devel] message marked as off topic

I marked #38219 as disputed as it has cannibalised my earlier proposal without any reference. Dima On 13 August 2024 10:04:12 BST, 'Martin R' via sage-devel wrote: >I asked a question at https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/38219 which was >promptly labelled off topic, so I suppose I should

[sage-devel] Re: hyperbolic_polygon bug

This was previously reported as issue #32362 on github , so any further discussion should take place there. The solution suggested there is to have sagemath calculate endpoints in the Poincare disk model, instead of in the upper half plane model.

[sage-devel] Re: message marked as off topic

Sorry, I don't understand. I was asking on the PR why the disputed label was *removed*, not added. And I do not understand, why my question was marked as "off topic". Martin On Tuesday 13 August 2024 at 13:55:32 UTC+2 Kwankyu Lee wrote: > According to the preliminary discussion on "disputed

[sage-devel] Re: message marked as off topic

According to the preliminary discussion on "disputed PRs" (https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/XDvKkMRoDk4): a. *When there is disagreement about whether a PR should be merged, anyone may mark a PR as disputed.* Now I guess that you may answer to your own questions. -- You received this

[sage-devel] message marked as off topic

I asked a question at https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/38219 which was promptly labelled off topic, so I suppose I should ask it here: The preceding message on the pull request was: I have removed the improper use of the "disputed" label. My question (and comment) was: Why is the