On Thursday, November 30, 2023 at 3:14:57 PM UTC-8 kcrisman wrote:
This is a good place to thank embray and darthandrus (among many others)
for work on previous Windows and Mac "one-click" download options, and
especially the 3-manifolds project for the current one for Mac.
+1
--
You receive
To the extent that this specific PR is emblematic of a particular approach
to Sage development (a flawed approach in Dima's view, if I understand
right), then the whole approach should be discussed here. Probably many of
these issues in Sage development have been discussed already, but it's
If we do not want to invent a new label, we may add "s: needs review", "s:
needs work", "s:needs info" altogether to get attention.
The pending script (https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36292) that
automatically manages the github labels won't be happy with this (several
status labels).
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 10:12 AM tobia...@gmx.de wrote:
> At first I was very enthusiastic about this proposed policy, but after
> thinking about this for a bit I'm no longer convinced this is a good idea.
>
> First of all, the policy sets out to solve the case "where there is a
> general consens
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 12:37 PM John H Palmieri
wrote:
> To the extent that this specific PR is emblematic of a particular approach
> to Sage development (a flawed approach in Dima's view, if I understand
> right), then the whole approach should be discussed here. Probably many of
> these issues
The original proposal allows for anyone to post to sage-devel to try to
raise awareness ("Also note that an objector is welcome to attempt to bring
others into the discussion on their side if they remain firmly opposed"). I
prefer allowing the various participants the freedom to decide whether t
