Re: [sage-devel] Procedure to be a member of sage github organization

2023-02-25 Thread Matthias Koeppe
See https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/35172 – a GH Actions workflow by Sebastian Oehms On Saturday, February 25, 2023 at 1:06:04 PM UTC-8 Trevor Karn wrote: > Ok so my takeaway is that for now at least we treat all PRs that are > untagged as needs review. Is there a way to set as a default

Re: [sage-devel] Procedure to be a member of sage github organization

2023-02-25 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 9:06 PM Trevor Karn wrote: > > Ok so my takeaway is that for now at least we treat all PRs that are untagged > as needs review. Is there a way to set as a default or get a bot to > automatically apply just the needs review label to any new PR? Any - that is not marked a

Re: [sage-devel] Procedure to be a member of sage github organization

2023-02-25 Thread Trevor Karn
Ok so my takeaway is that for now at least we treat all PRs that are untagged as needs review. Is there a way to set as a default or get a bot to automatically apply just the needs review label to any new PR? On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 2:20 PM Matthias Koeppe wrote: > Re the "needs review" tag, see

Re: [sage-devel] Procedure to be a member of sage github organization

2023-02-25 Thread Matthias Koeppe
Re the "needs review" tag, see earlier discussion in https://github.com/sagemath/trac-to-github/issues/8#issuecomment-1367744734 On Saturday, February 25, 2023 at 11:48:08 AM UTC-8 Vincent Delecroix wrote: > I think that the needs_review positive_review tags do not fit well in > the github work

Re: [sage-devel] Procedure to be a member of sage github organization

2023-02-25 Thread Vincent Delecroix
I think that the needs_review positive_review tags do not fit well in the github workflow. These have been kept to mimic the trac workflow but are annoying. I support Edgar suggestion that the "needs review tag" should be replaced by "not a draft" status. Similarly, the "positive review tag" would

Re: [sage-devel] Procedure to be a member of sage github organization

2023-02-25 Thread Edgar Costa
Most likely not the status quo at the moment, but if a PR is not ready to be reviewed should be marked as a draft, which the author can do without any special permissions. Otherwise, I would assume the PR is ready to be reviewed. On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 9:43 PM Trevor Karn wrote: > How do new de

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Follow NEP 29: Recommended Python version

2023-02-25 Thread Dima Pasechnik
I think it is a great idea. Even if the system python is older than one needed, one can still use e.g. pyenv to get an up to date python, without the need to build your own. And pyenv does allow us to drop python3 spkg, something we should do, too. Dima On Sat, 25 Feb 2023, 07:16 Matthias Koeppe