On Monday, January 7, 2019 at 12:48:30 PM UTC-8, Simon King wrote:I did the
implementation a couple of years ago, so, it is possible that
> I misremember. However, if I recall correctly, having a reference
> directly from the wrapped method to the cache, rather than going from the
> wrapped me
Hi!
On 2019-01-07, E. Madison Bray wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 5:29 PM VulK wrote:
>> Unfortunately this is not the case; this method store its cache *both* in the
>> parent and in the element. Apparently this was done in #8611 for speed
>> reasons. I do not really understand the rationale
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 09:51, jplab wrote:
> Dear Thierry,
>
> I have to solve polynomial systems of equations on a regular basis and
> would be happy to see sage improve in this respect.
>
> My strategy is to use numerical algorithms.
>
another approach is via sum of squares (sos) relaxations (L
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 4:20 PM Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On 07/01/2019 18:07, E. Madison Bray wrote:
> > Sage 8.6 will also require an update of cysignals to 1.8.1. Is that
> > in the works? How would I ago about updating that package?
>
> I will take care of the packaging of cygsignal
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 5:29 PM VulK wrote:
>
> Dear All,
> I am working on some multivariate polynomial ring and I need to be able to
> repeatedly evaluate some elements numerically. Since the elements I am
> evaluating are few while the number of evaluations is high I thought to cache
> the resu
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 02:38:40PM +0100, E. Madison Bray wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 11:28 AM Tobias Hansen wrote:
> >
> > On 1/5/19 1:18 PM, Thierry wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > could Debian maintainers please explicitely tell us on the sage-devel
> > > mailing-list what should be done
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 2:38 PM E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 11:28 AM Tobias Hansen wrote:
> >
> > On 1/5/19 1:18 PM, Thierry wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > could Debian maintainers please explicitely tell us on the sage-devel
> > > mailing-list what should be done soon so that
On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 2:58 PM Timo Kaufmann wrote:
>
> I just encountered a bug when trying to generate a patch file using
> `https://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/rawdiff`. It generated a malformed patch.
> I wanted to report that upstream to cgit, but then I noticed that our cgit
> installation
On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 11:28 AM Tobias Hansen wrote:
>
> On 1/5/19 1:18 PM, Thierry wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > could Debian maintainers please explicitely tell us on the sage-devel
> > mailing-list what should be done soon so that 8.6 could enter forthcoming
> > buster release with recent dependencies
On 2019-01-07 12:34, Jean-Florent Raymond wrote:
> I think I know how to fix it. Should I open a trac ticket?
Yes, please. (And do a quick search on trac before so that noone else
has created a ticket for this, but I doubt it.)
Daniel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to t
Hello,
I am new on this mailing list, a casual sage user for several years who
would like to contribute to sage. My first message here is about a minor
issue.
I noticed that the neighbor_iterator method does not give a correct
error message when given a vertex that does not belong to the graph.
Dear Thierry,
I have to solve polynomial systems of equations on a regular basis and
would be happy to see sage improve in this respect.
My strategy is to use numerical algorithms.
There is Bertini (I glued together my own customized interface to it 4-5
years ago). They now migrated to C code
12 matches
Mail list logo
