Vincent,
I'm not expecting perfection :) It seems like a problem I might be able
to fix with a little direction. I did look though the code,but didn't
make much progress.
I know I have run under the debugger before, but for the life of me I
can remember how I did it. If I could figure out how to
Dear Andy,
Thanks for your report.
Note that this result is not wrong with the extra parenthesis. Perhaps
a bit annoying.
SageMath is developed by volunteers and not perfect. You are very
welcome to contribute to its enhancement
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/
Best
Vincent
Le 0
Hello,
I'm not sure if this is a bug or not. I'm just starting to learn
differential equations. The latex returned for 'h' below has superfluous
() around the '-x' exponent.
y = var('y')
Plot1=plot_slope_field(2-y,(x,0,3),(y,0,20))
y = function('y')(x) # declare y to be a function of x
h = desol
I wanted to also add that I am installing using 'screen' command in linux
and am not sure if that would be causing the problem. Should I be avoiding
that?
On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 3:19 PM Nagesh Adluru
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks for sharing that insight. I did install the anaconda in between fo
Hi Volker,
On 2018-09-02, Simon King wrote:
> The non-similarities:
> ...
> - Your code is recursive. I replace the recursion by a loop, as at some
> point the recursion went over the permitted limit.
I just tested: Your code also gives an error because of recursion. So,
here are some changes
Hi Dima,
On 2018-09-02, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Sep 2018, 17:53 Simon King, wrote:
>> On 2018-09-02, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> > It would be good to submit a Singular bug report with an example at
>> > https://github.com/Singular/Sources
>>
>> I guess I should rather file it in the Sin
On Sun, 2 Sep 2018, 17:53 Simon King, wrote:
> Hi Dima,
>
> On 2018-09-02, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > It would be good to submit a Singular bug report with an example at
> > https://github.com/Singular/Sources
>
> I guess I should rather file it in the Singular trac. Well, I'll wait to
> see
> if
I don't know about centos, but on OSX this situation occurs when anaconda
is installed, and the anaconda directories occur earlier in the path than
the system directories. Removing anaconda from the path before building
sage fixes the problem.
On Sunday, September 2, 2018 at 8:15:33 AM UTC-4,
Hi Dima,
On 2018-09-02, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> It would be good to submit a Singular bug report with an example at
> https://github.com/Singular/Sources
I guess I should rather file it in the Singular trac. Well, I'll wait to see
if a post in the Singular forum helps :-)
> It's silly to see an
Hi Volker,
On 2018-09-02, Volker Braun wrote:
> FWIW I once wrote a monomial ideal implementation in Sage/Cython, probably
> for some related reason though I forget exactly why I couldn't use
> Singular. Its presumably similar to the code you wrote already. It doesn't
> do weights but does imp
On Sun, 2 Sep 2018, 15:15 Simon King, wrote:
>
> Since this post summarises replies to various posts in this thread and to
> an off-list message, I am making this a reply to the top of the thread.
>
It probably should get subject line "sorry state of basic open-source
commutative altebra" :-)
FWIW I once wrote a monomial ideal implementation in Sage/Cython, probably
for some related reason though I forget exactly why I couldn't use
Singular. Its presumably similar to the code you wrote already. It doesn't
do weights but does implement the refined HS. A reasonably fast
implementation
That is exactly the case: the cocoalib package is just that for the moment:
a way to install cocoalib from sage.
The plan when that was done was to write a cython interface , but that
hasn't been done yet. Since cocoalib is a very big library, I think it
would be a good idea to do so incrementa
Hi Dima,
On 2018-09-02, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> I wonder what kind of overflow you get in Singular - is it related to
> exponents being too small to incorporate your weights?
No. Quite simply the elements of an intvec in Singular have to be at
most 2147483647, but the coefficients of the first
Hi!
Since this post summarises replies to various posts in this thread and to
an off-list message, I am making this a reply to the top of the thread.
Objective: As a *small* part of some group cohomology computations, I need
to compute the first Hilbert series of certain homogeneous ideals in
gra
I had actually thought of that but the sys admin thought we had the devel
installed. I will pursue this line with more pressure now that I have your
suggestion as well.
Thanks again so much for the prompt help!
Best,
Nagesh
On Sun, Sep 2, 2018, 2:12 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
> On Sunday, Sep
I wonder what kind of overflow you get in Singular - is it related to exponents
being too small to incorporate your weights?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
I agree that frobby interface appatently has a bug, as there should be no
coefficients different from 1 in the expansion of the series.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
Hi Dima,
On 2018-09-02, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Frobby gives you the Hilbert function with N^n-grading, with all weights of
> the variables x_j being 1.
> I may be saying something silly, but isn't substituting x_j |-> x_j^{w_j}
> for weights w_j of x_j gives you the function you need (making
On Sunday, September 2, 2018 at 1:27:46 AM UTC+3, Nagesh Adluru wrote:
>
> Hi Dima,
>
> Between the delays from our IT admin and me trying to resolve the issue by
> myself since in the original log there was no issue of libcurl, I got
> delayed in getting back.
>
The log says:
configure: erro
Hi Simon,
Le samedi 1 septembre 2018 22:59:12 UTC+2, Simon King a écrit :
>
>
>
> The question in all cases (frobby, Normaliz, LattE, CoCoA) is whether the
> conversion
> from Singular is efficient.
>
>
Normaliz can compute the Hilbert series of monomial ideals given different
gradings.
With
On Sunday, September 2, 2018 at 12:28:56 AM UTC+3, Simon King wrote:
>
> Hi Dima,
>
> On 2018-09-01, Dima Pasechnik > wrote:
> > Did you check that
> >
> http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/interfaces/sage/interfaces/frobby.html#sage.interfaces.frobby.Frobby.hilbert
>
> > doesn't do w
22 matches
Mail list logo
