IMHO its a code smell if your code doesn't work on 32-bit platforms.
Remember, almost all 32 bit platforms are perfectly capable of working with
64-bit integers (just not as fast). But your code must be *correct* (e.g.
use uint64_t), and not just coincidentally work on some compiler/platform
bu
Hi
On 19 September 2017 at 19:25, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
Probably your gmp or mpir was not built correctly:
> Indeed:
>
> /usr/bin/ld: /srv/sage-8.0/local/lib/libgmp.a(fat_entry.o): relocation
> R_X86_64_32S against symbol `__gmpn_cpuvec' can not be used when making a
> shared object; recompile
OK, I tried - I got this from two sources, so I took a chance, yes it did -
relief - thank you!
Martin
Am Mittwoch, 20. September 2017 07:31:54 UTC+2 schrieb Thierry
(sage-googlesucks@xxx):
>
> Hi,
>
> does 'git trac push --force' work ?
>
> Ciao,
> Thierry
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 10
Hi,
does 'git trac push --force' work ?
Ciao,
Thierry
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 10:19:09PM -0700, 'Martin R' via sage-devel wrote:
> Dear git gurus,
>
> I accidentally pushed a merge to https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22921.
> Locally, I can "undo" this with
>
> git reset --hard 84093c4bc19
Dear git gurus,
I accidentally pushed a merge to https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22921.
Locally, I can "undo" this with
git reset --hard 84093c4bc19d2aa7e353dfa2b2436a5bf56b96b8
but I do now know how to do this on the ticket, and I am afraid of
following advice of some random git blog page.
Currently, some code is unable to be included in Sage (except as an
optional package) because it is not 32-bit safe. One example close to my
heart is Drew Sutherland's smalljac package for computing L-series of
hyperelliptic curves; Drew's position is that "life is too short to worry
about over
I just upgraded an OS X box to Xcode 9.0, and now Sage doesn't build:
- with a fresh Sage 8.1.beta5 tarball, gcc doesn't build:
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/include/c++/v1/functional:1398:2:
error: no member named 'fancy_abort' in namespace
sage -gdb
On Tuesday, September 19, 2017 at 3:47:18 PM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> Dear all,
> For #22679 I need to run Sage from a debugger (lldb or gdb); I know how to
> start the debugger with the right executable:
>
> $ . src/bin/sage-env
> $ lldb local/bin/python2.7
>
> and then issu
Hi
On 19 September 2017 at 21:18, Jan Groenewald wrote:
> Thanks
>
> On 19 September 2017 at 21:08, Ximin Luo wrote:
>
>> Samuel Lelièvre:
>> > Dear debian-science-sagemath,
>> >
>> > There is a question on sage-devel about SageMath
>> > on Debian and MathJax:
>> >
>> > https://groups.google.co
Thanks
On 19 September 2017 at 21:08, Ximin Luo wrote:
> Samuel Lelièvre:
> > Dear debian-science-sagemath,
> >
> > There is a question on sage-devel about SageMath
> > on Debian and MathJax:
> >
> > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-devel/sL_iYHfFB2M/discussion
> >
> > Could anyone on this
Samuel Lelièvre:
> Dear debian-science-sagemath,
>
> There is a question on sage-devel about SageMath
> on Debian and MathJax:
>
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-devel/sL_iYHfFB2M/discussion
>
> Could anyone on this list answer it?
>
Hi, (I think) the default is actually controlled by
Since the people in the thread "proposal: downgrade libtheora to
experimental package"
at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-devel/olOxh1f6-cc were
quite in favour of going even further then just downgrading it here a
concrete proposal:
remove the optional libogg and libtheora packag
Hey John,
I'm not quite sure. There are two approaches that come to mind. The
first is to implement an analog of CombinatorialFreeModule_Tensor for this
setting. Then it is a matter of overriding the Tensor attribute on the
classes you want to use for your special tensor multiplication. Howev
Hi,
+1 from me for removing Sage packages that don’t have good maintenance.
I’m perhaps viewed as ultimately responsible in some way for these (at
least the infrastructure where they sit), and definitely be happier if we
don’t distribute anything that we don’t really, really have to.
And for Pyt
In fact, libogg and libtheora are sort of frozen; this
https://git.xiph.org/?p=theora.git
looks quite low-activity, too.
On Tuesday, September 19, 2017 at 4:54:20 PM UTC+1, Thierry
(sage-googlesucks@xxx) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> if we are sure that libtheora is of no use, why not just removing it ? Th
Probably your gmp or mpir was not built correctly:
Indeed:
/usr/bin/ld: /srv/sage-8.0/local/lib/libgmp.a(fat_entry.o): relocation
R_X86_64_32S against symbol `__gmpn_cpuvec' can not be used when making a
shared object; recompile with -fPIC
Of er is een kat op de muizenberg... :-)
On Tuesday,
Hi,
if we are sure that libtheora is of no use, why not just removing it ? The
goal of Sage, even Sage-the-distribution, is not to distribute as much as
possible (note that there are currently 265 packages).
Same question for libogg.
See also the thread about "useless" packages with 'pip' type,
fails on semi-current gentoo:
[libtheora-1.1.1] libtool: link: gcc -Wall -Wno-parentheses -O3
-fforce-addr -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops
-Wl,-rpath -Wl,/home/dima/Sage/sage-dev/local/lib -o .libs/png2theora
png2theora-png2theora.o -L/home/dima/Sage/sage-dev/local/lib
Dear all,
For #22679 I need to run Sage from a debugger (lldb or gdb); I know how to
start the debugger with the right executable:
$ . src/bin/sage-env
$ lldb local/bin/python2.7
and then issue "run" debugger command to start Python, import Sage, etc.
But I don't understand how to load iPyth
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 15:07:23 UTC+2, vdelecroix wrote:
>
> On 19/09/2017 14:22, Maarten Derickx wrote:
>
> > Currently the optional package libtheora fails to install: see
> > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23732 for details.
>
> Actually, I also had troubles on Ubuntu 64 bits (base
On 19/09/2017 14:22, Maarten Derickx wrote:
Hi Fellow sage devs cc Wilfied Huss,
Currently the optional package libtheora fails to install: see
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23732 for details.
Actually, I also had troubles on Ubuntu 64 bits (based on debian).
I have looked a bit into this
Hi Fellow sage devs cc Wilfied Huss,
Currently the optional package libtheora fails to install: see
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23732 for details.
I have looked a bit into this, and I could not find a place where this
package actually enhances the sage library so this would just be a package
Hello,
on
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/polynomial_rings/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.html
is an examle, how to use Gröbner walk.
sage: R.=PolynomialRing(GF(32003),3,order='lex')
sage: I=Ideal([y^3+x*y*z+y^2*z+x*z^3,3+x*y+x^2*y+y^2*z])
sage: I.transformed_basis('gwal
On Thu, 7 Sep 2017, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
did you see
this:https://benjamin-hackl.at/2016/01/16/jupyterhub-with-sagemath-kernel/
It seems that all of the requirements you list are there...
Not sharing notebooks, but it seems that it has been done later:
https://github.com/jupyterhub/hubshare
Hi
I am running the debian 9 packaged sagemath-common and sagemath-jupyter.
This gives a jupyter notebook which can open sage-7.4 worksheets.
LaTeX is rendering horribly by default: short ugly integral signs shorter
than the expression that follows, and broken square root signs, amongst
other.
I
Hi Simon,
Simon King wrote:
> Is there a faster way to read and evaluate a large python code
> block than sage.repl.load.load?
I think %runfile is somewhat faster, though not exactly fast.
--
Marc
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group
26 matches
Mail list logo
