Sounds like what “module”/lmod are supposed to do automatically
for you. Sourcing sage-env effectively give you a sage shell
as you would if you run “sage -sh”. Again there is not really
a deactivation. It starts a new shell and once you type exit
you are out.
But you could try to work out someth
Hi,
Conda packages can have a activate.sh and deactivate.sh bash files that are
run when an environment containing that package is activated or deactivated.
I was thinking about doing "source bin/sage-env" to activate the sage
environment. Problem is that there is no deactivate script that restor
Thank you for the suggestions! Much appreciated.
On Sunday, March 12, 2017 at 2:47:55 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sunday, March 12, 2017 at 6:01:29 PM UTC, lvas...@berkeley.edu wrote:
>>
>> Wow, it works! Yay!
>>
>
> to skip building sage's documentation, one can run 'make build' r
> In summary, I'll withdraw my vote for (1).
Interesting and funny situation!
If there's no more opposition, I may give positive review to #22470
tomorrow, after all. If you're wondering, #22470 keeps support for
_pari_, but deprecates it in favour of __pari__.
Luca
--
You received this messag
On 03/16/2017 12:26 AM, Ralf Stephan wrote:
> The author of 1234 has IMO the responsibility to monitor 987 and do
> timely updates of 1234 when 987 changes, including canceling the
> positive flag on 1234.
>
I don't want to beat this to death, but if the author of 1234 is so
vigilant, why can't h
I'm also willing to change my mind, since I don't feel that strongly, and a
number of people in favor of __pari__ seem to care a lot.
There is still a nonzero cost to deprecation, since people will have to
change their code to update to the new convention. But I don't think there
are that many us
Hi!
On 2017-03-15, kcrisman wrote:
>> Now that we are in the process of having a proper interface to polymake
>> (see [1] thanks to Simon) I would propose to move the package polymake
>> from experimental to optional. For those who don't know, polymake is a
>> CAS focused on polytopes (and tor
On 2017-03-16, Ralf Stephan wrote:
> The author of 1234 has IMO the responsibility to monitor 987 and do timely
> updates of 1234 when 987 changes, including canceling the positive flag on
> 1234.
+1
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" gr
