On 2016-11-23 22:46, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
I have been using Jupyter locally for my teaching since two years, and
am very happy with it. The only missing features have been migration
tool from sagenb and interacts; both are on their way.
For interacts, see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21
Thanks I will! enough there to think about already !
J
PS nteract looks cool
On 24 November 2016 at 00:07, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Jack Dyson wrote:
>> Right cheers for that William! will give it a go, hopefully we'll have it as
>> standard at some point soon.
>
>
Hi Nicolas,
Le mercredi 23 novembre 2016 22:46:34 UTC+1, Nicolas M. Thiéry a écrit :
>
>
> I have been using Jupyter locally for my teaching since two years, and
> am very happy with it. The only missing features have been migration
> tool from sagenb and interacts; both are on their way.
>
>
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Jack Dyson wrote:
> Right cheers for that William! will give it a go, hopefully we'll have it as
> standard at some point soon.
If you do want to work on that, some thoughts:
- There is a "painful" dependency on RethinkDB, which is a C++
program that takes a wh
Right cheers for that William! will give it a go, hopefully we'll have it
as standard at some point soon.
Best from here,
J
On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 10:00:05 PM UTC+1, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Jan Groenewald > wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > On 23 Novembe
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Jack Dyson wrote:
> Hi Dima,
>
> Thankyou for your quick reply - I appreciate what you said about development
> of sagenb as a whole, and actually I do see the point.
>
> Logically therefore, as you indicate, iPython is a good alternative.
> Unfortunately, it is no
Hi Dima,
Thankyou for your quick reply - I appreciate what you said about
development of sagenb as a whole, and actually I do see the point.
Logically therefore, as you indicate, iPython is a good alternative.
Unfortunately, it is not fully compatible with sagemath, for example R
doesn't acces
On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 9:29:44 PM UTC, Jan Groenewald wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On 23 November 2016 at 22:59, William Stein > wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Jan Groenewald > > wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > On 23 November 2016 at 22:05, Dima Pasechnik > > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>>
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:11:02PM +0200, Jan Groenewald wrote:
>Would jupyter be a possible replacement for sagenb if sagenb is
>discontinued from active development? Is it already on a stand-alone
>sagemath install?
I have been using Jupyter locally for my teaching since two years,
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Jan Groenewald wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 23 November 2016 at 22:59, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Jan Groenewald wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > On 23 November 2016 at 22:05, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I understand that opinion
Hi
On 23 November 2016 at 22:59, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Jan Groenewald wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > On 23 November 2016 at 22:05, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> I understand that opinions on usability of https://github.com/sagemath/
> sagenb/tree/newui
> >>
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Jan Groenewald wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On 23 November 2016 at 22:05, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>>
>> I understand that opinions on usability of
>> https://github.com/sagemath/sagenb/tree/newui
>> diverge. (and with the breakneck speed javascript
>> frameworks are deve
On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 8:11:27 PM UTC, Jan Groenewald wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On 23 November 2016 at 22:05, Dima Pasechnik > wrote:
>
>>
>> I understand that opinions on usability of
>> https://github.com/sagemath/sagenb/tree/newui
>> diverge. (and with the breakneck speed javascript
>>
Dear Hezi,
> On Nov 23, 2016, at 03:39 , Hezi Halawi wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I am writing a code in sage about automorphic representations and Eisenstein
> series, and I would like to publish it as a package in sage. Does anybody
> know the requirements for publishing?
>
> On the level of
Hi
On 23 November 2016 at 22:05, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> I understand that opinions on usability of https://github.com/
> sagemath/sagenb/tree/newui
> diverge. (and with the breakneck speed javascript
> frameworks are developed, one may ask whether something written in 2012 is
> still a great
On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 6:42:40 PM UTC, Jack Dyson wrote:
>
> On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 10:44:21 AM UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I propose to make SageNB no longer a separate package but to move it
> > back into the Sage git tree. For purposes of installat
On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 10:44:21 AM UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I propose to make SageNB no longer a separate package but to move it
> back into the Sage git tree. For purposes of installation and use of
> SageNB, it will still be a separate Python package, but the sources
PS:
On 2016-11-23, Simon King wrote:
> Hence, if you want a polynomial ring over QQ that has the same algebraic
> relations as a boolean polynomial ring, you could do
>
> sage: B. = BooleanPolynomialRing()
> sage: B.defining_ideal().ring().change_ring(QQ).quo(B.defining_ideal())
>
Hi,
On 2016-11-22, Rusydi H. Makarim wrote:
>> Shouldn't it raise an error as soon as the "new" base ring is different
>> from GF(2)?
>>
>
> I don't see any reason why this should not be allowed in the case of
> BooleanPolynomialRing.
Because a BooleanPolynomialRing is defined to be a ring over
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> AFAIK (20+ years experience with (lib)CDD ;-)) autotools support was donated
> to cdd many years ago, at 2001,
> and it predates Sage.
> I'm sure updates would be welcome.
Alright, thanks for the history. I knew there were some pages that
AFAIK (20+ years experience with (lib)CDD ;-)) autotools support was
donated to cdd many years ago, at 2001,
and it predates Sage.
I'm sure updates would be welcome.
On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 11:40:07 AM UTC, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 12:24:43 P
Dear all,
I am writing a code in sage about automorphic representations and
Eisenstein series, and I would like to publish it as a package in sage.
Does anybody know the requirements for publishing ?
On the level of the documentation what is expected? Any tutorial will be
helpful.
Is there
On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 12:24:43 PM UTC+1, Erik Bray wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Jean-Pierre Flori > wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 12:17:08 PM UTC+1, Jean-Pierre Flori
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> We should definitely contact upstream if updating
Hi Volker, Dima,
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 02:33:12PM -0800, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>Volker says that one most probably only
>needs https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19915
>(which needs some love...)
>and then it would work.
Ah right! Thanks to both of you for the quick answer
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 12:17:08 PM UTC+1, Jean-Pierre Flori
> wrote:
>>
>> We should definitely contact upstream if updating the autotools stuff
>> there is needed.
>
> But do they ship autotools stuff or does it come fro
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Francois Bissey
wrote:
> configure.in are certainly a bad indicator. Anything with one
> of these instead of configure.ac triggers a warning in gentoo
> that support for it will be dropped sooner than later.
Yes, I get that warning as well. It's mostly superfici
On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 12:17:08 PM UTC+1, Jean-Pierre Flori
wrote:
>
> We should definitely contact upstream if updating the autotools stuff
> there is needed.
>
But do they ship autotools stuff or does it come from Sage?
Old tickets:
* https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/13026
* htt
We should definitely contact upstream if updating the autotools stuff there
is needed.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@goog
configure.in are certainly a bad indicator. Anything with one
of these instead of configure.ac triggers a warning in gentoo
that support for it will be dropped sooner than later.
In any case what kind of changes do you want to apply, I
may have better luck with my packaging machinery.
François
>
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 11:31 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> You need the "unprefixed libgap" where the symbols are not prefixed.
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19915
Wouldn't it also be possible, in principle, to build a separate set of
binaries for the GAP packages that are linked against libGAP
On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 10:59:26 AM UTC, Erik Bray wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Dima Pasechnik > wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 10:32:59 AM UTC, Erik Bray wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Jean-Pierre Flori
> >> wrote:
> >
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 10:32:59 AM UTC, Erik Bray wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Jean-Pierre Flori
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thursday, November 17, 2016 at 5:27:15 PM UTC+1, Erik Bray wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hmm
On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 10:32:59 AM UTC, Erik Bray wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Jean-Pierre Flori > wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thursday, November 17, 2016 at 5:27:15 PM UTC+1, Erik Bray wrote:
> >>
> >> Hmm, okay. I am using my system's autoreconf. For the sage autoto
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, November 17, 2016 at 5:27:15 PM UTC+1, Erik Bray wrote:
>>
>> Hmm, okay. I am using my system's autoreconf. For the sage autotools
>> is that just an optional package I need to install?
>
> Yes.
Well, this is still tur
On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 11:29:45 PM UTC, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> Thats a big shit sandwich We could just copy Apple's openssl headers
> from the last version. Presumably they'll keep shipping the old library
> since Python keeps depending on it. Or are they planning to pull a 3.5mm
35 matches
Mail list logo
