On Friday, 27 May 2016 13:44:29 UTC-6, paulmasson wrote:
>
> If it helps to know, the Sage app is working fine for me on both my iPhone
> and iPad. Some cells don't display nicely until the "Evaluate" button is
> tapped, but otherwise everything appears to function.
>
> Perhaps the reported error
On Friday, May 27, 2016 at 11:31:59 PM UTC+1, Eric Larson wrote:
>
> Any suggestions? From /home/eric/sage/logs/pkgs/sagelib-7.2.log (full log
> file attached):
>
nothing seems to be attached;
anyway, it looks like there was a failure to build Sage's atlas package.
Please check by looking at th
Any suggestions? From /home/eric/sage/logs/pkgs/sagelib-7.2.log (full log
file attached):
make[3]: Entering directory '/home/eric/sage/src'
python -u setup.py install
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "setup.py", lin
If it helps to know, the Sage app is working fine for me on both my iPhone
and iPad. Some cells don't display nicely until the "Evaluate" button is
tapped, but otherwise everything appears to function.
Perhaps the reported error had to do with changes being made last week on
the server. Not see
University may decide to license your code under different
conditions (if they make money with it then you will get a part). For more
details
https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCode.do?idArticle=LEGIARTI06278868&idSectionTA=LEGISCTA06161633&cidTexte=LEGITEXT06069414&dateTe
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:30 AM, rjf wrote:
> So you should claim authorship and copyright, and then declare that others
> may
> use it under whatever restrictions you determine. Personally, I find the
> MIT or
> Berkeley licenses much better than GPL, since they let anyone use the code
> for an
The point is, if you don't claim authorship, someone else might, and (for
example)
restrict access, even by you.
So you should claim authorship and copyright, and then declare that others
may
use it under whatever restrictions you determine. Personally, I find the
MIT or
Berkeley licenses much
Sorry if I never got around to dealing with all the patches.
I'm will to look at it again, if someone is willing to spell it all out for
me :-)
On Thursday, May 26, 2016 at 10:55:25 AM UTC-4, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
> I tried to do archeology once for this one and found nothing conclusive...
>
On Friday, 27 May 2016 00:28:13 UTC-6, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>
> I’m not sure I trust the debugging facilities, but can’t it seem to load
> jquery. However, the url it’s querying works just fine in a desktop
> browser or with curl. In fact, it doesn’t seem to have $ defined.
>
> I finally figured
On Friday, 27 May 2016 00:32:55 UTC-6, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>
> Also, I see a deprecation warning at http://aleph.sagemath.org/?q=deuoxi
> namely:
>
> sagemathcell.py:29: DeprecationWarning: html(...) will change soon to
> return HTML instead of printing it. Instead use pretty_print(html(...)) for
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Harald Schilly
wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Erik Bray wrote:
>> But if there were a contributor agreement I
>> could give the Sage project permission to copy / use my code under its
>> license without explicitly putting my name on it
>
> The problem
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Erik Bray wrote:
> But if there were a contributor agreement I
> could give the Sage project permission to copy / use my code under its
> license without explicitly putting my name on it
The problem here is very simple: which legal entity would be on the
opposite
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> There is no contributor license agreement. Every file must be GPLv2+
> licensed. If you start a new file you have copyright on that module whether
> you put your name in there or not; But we need the GPLv2+ statement to
> distribute it as par
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 1:15 PM, David Joyner wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 6:48 AM, Erik Bray wrote:
>> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Jeroen Demeyer
>> wrote:
>>> On 2016-05-26 12:16, Erik Bray wrote:
So my question is, what should I put in a new file?
>>>
>>> http://doc.sagem
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Harald Schilly
wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, May 26, 2016 at 12:16:11 PM UTC+2, Erik Bray wrote:
>>
>> I don't want to
>> claim copyright ownership under my own name
>
>
>
> you cannot do that legally, and in some countries of the world this would
> even lead to a si
On Thursday, May 26, 2016 at 12:16:11 PM UTC+2, Erik Bray wrote:
>
> I don't want to
> claim copyright ownership under my own name
>
you cannot do that legally, and in some countries of the world this would
even lead to a situation where your contribution cannot be used at all. I'm
guessin
16 matches
Mail list logo
