OK, but what was the shell command that caused this?
Did you just start Sage? Something else?
On Wednesday, February 24, 2016 at 8:59:08 PM UTC, Jon Redinger wrote:
>
> jon@jon-MP061:~/Downloads/sage/SageMath$ uname -a
> Linux jon-MP061 4.2.0-30-generic #35-Ubuntu SMP Fri Feb 19 13:51:55 UTC
> 2
Nathan, I'm glad you posted this so others can see your perspective on
things. It will no doubt be eye opening for some people who just don't
understand where you are coming from.
But as I said, it is your opinion that William is coming in and making
decisions that affect Sage without consultin
Hello Karl-Dieter,
> As to the substance of Nathann's comments, most of this is really an
argument
> about the GPL, or rather about how many of the potentialities in the GPL
are
> acceptable to a given community around a GPL product
This interpretation of my comments, if this is what you proposed
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, kcrisman wrote:
As to the substance of Nathann's comments, most of this is really an
argument about the GPL, or rather about how many of the potentialities
in the GPL are acceptable to a given community around a GPL product.
Nathann is not only one thinking this. But at l
As to the substance of Nathann's comments, most of this is really an
argument about the GPL, or rather about how many of the potentialities in
the GPL are acceptable to a given community around a GPL product. If you
prefer not to contribute to GPL software, that is your right. But GPL
softwar
Regarding the most recent conversation turn... again, as if it needed to be
said, this is great material for sage-flame.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an ema
Oh wow. Short path? That was one short read. Hope it works. ;)
On Wednesday, February 24, 2016 at 3:59:08 PM UTC-5, Jon Redinger wrote:
>
> jon@jon-MP061:~/Downloads/sage/SageMath$ uname -a
> Linux jon-MP061 4.2.0-30-generic #35-Ubuntu SMP Fri Feb 19 13:51:55 UTC
> 2016 i686 i686 i686 GNU/Linux
>
Thanks, Martin! I'm all about bread crumb trails and the smarts to figure
how what they mean! I'll give it a read. So many of the googlable answers
were sufficiently inconclusive that I thought it best to report the
problem. All the same, I appreciate explicit pointers. Again, many thanks!
- Jo
kolmapäev, 24. veebruar 2016 22:59.08 UTC+2 kirjutas Jon Redinger:
>
> jon@jon-MP061:~/Downloads/sage/SageMath$ uname -a
> ...
> Snip:
> File
> "/home/jon/Downloads/sage/SageMath/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/core/__init__.py",
>
> line 14, in
> ...
>
The ATLAS library sure seems
Oh, and libsatlas.so is present on the system.
jon@jon-MP061:~/Downloads/sage$ !761
find . -name libsatlas*
./SageMath/local/lib/libsatlas.so
On Wednesday, February 24, 2016 at 3:59:08 PM UTC-5, Jon Redinger wrote:
>
> jon@jon-MP061:~/Downloads/sage/SageMath$ uname -a
> Linux jon-MP061 4.2.0-30-
jon@jon-MP061:~/Downloads/sage/SageMath$ uname -a
Linux jon-MP061 4.2.0-30-generic #35-Ubuntu SMP Fri Feb 19 13:51:55 UTC
2016 i686 i686 i686 GNU/Linux
sage-7.0-Ubuntu_15.10-i686.tar.bz2
Snip:
File
"/home/jon/Downloads/sage/SageMath/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/core/__init__.py",
http://sagemath.blogspot.com/2016/02/if-you-were-new-faculty-member-again.html
--
William (http://wstein.org)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sag
On 2016-02-24 18:16, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>> * What files are welcome there?
> Anything which satisfies the rules on doctests (in particular, tests should
> not
> take too much time).
What is the definition of "too much time"?
Instead of the usual time per test (which is rather pointless here),
On 2016-02-24 15:33, Clemens Heuberger wrote:
Some subquestions coming to my mind:
* Shall tests related to publications be moved to another directory
(sage/tests/publications)?
Fine.
* What files are welcome there?
Anything which satisfies the rules on doctests (in particular, tests
should n
On 2016-02-23 16:57, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2016-02-23 15:50, Clemens Heuberger wrote:
>> Bottom line: I cannot reproduce 11 month old results anymore.
>
> Personally, I think this is a flaw in the review process for Sage tickets.
> Reviewers should check whether existing code might break with
On 2016-02-24 04:48, Clemens Heuberger wrote:
> On 2016-02-23 17:29, Clemens Heuberger wrote:
>> I try to pinpoint the other examples and will then report those.
>
> Here is the next issue which I encountered:
>
> $ sage-6.9/sage -c "print bool((x^2 - 1 - (x+1)*(x-1)) != 0)"
> False
> $ sage-6.10
On Wednesday, February 24, 2016 at 9:43:04 AM UTC, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>
> the fact that you made a very successful sale to CNRS of a nicely wrapped
>> in Sage patches product, called "Nathann Cohen, PhD", to a tune of few
>> million euro,
>> (paid is small instalments called "salary")
>> looks
>
> the fact that you made a very successful sale to CNRS of a nicely wrapped
> in Sage patches product, called "Nathann Cohen, PhD", to a tune of few
> million euro,
> (paid is small instalments called "salary")
> looks perfectly OK for you, as this is money going into your bank account,
> righ
On Wednesday, February 24, 2016 at 7:49:58 AM UTC, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>
> Hello again,
>
> I read your comments and answered some of them. Let's make it simple:
>
> - William, who works at making people confuse Sage with his product
> SageMathCloud (making promotional videos ...)
> - Nicola
19 matches
Mail list logo
