Re: [sage-devel] Bliss bug?

On Sat, 12 Dec 2015, Nathann Cohen wrote: Can someone confirm this? With bliss installed Works for me too. But what you report is a bug with which we fought hard in the past already: do you use the latest beta and the latest version of bliss? Yep, seems to work on newest beta on Ubuntu after

Re: [sage-devel] Request for advice : extending/reimplementing the R interface with RPy2 ?

Thanks, I missed this one (I searched for "r-project"). Well, you can add a dependency on rpy2 younger than 2.3.2 (the current 2.7.4 whic I propose in Trac#19638 does the job. HTH, -- Emmanuel Charpentier Le dimanche 13 décembre 2015 00:49:58 UTC+1, Vol

Re: [sage-devel] Request for advice : extending/reimplementing the R interface with RPy2 ?

Dear William, Le dimanche 13 décembre 2015 00:44:08 UTC+1, William a écrit : [ Snip ] > > It seems like the official R kernel for Jupyter, which you don't > mention, is relevant: http://irkernel.github.io/ > Indeed. That's what I want to use : it works, ... provided that the rpy2 interface

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Definition of multifactorial #5415

How can I change doctest to check my changes made.? On Saturday, December 12, 2015 at 9:06:32 PM UTC+5:30, prateek sharma wrote: > > Thanks .It worked. > Please review the changes made. > http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/5415 > > On Friday, December 11, 2015 at 4:43:51 AM UTC+5:30, Nils Bruin wrote

Re: [sage-devel] Bliss bug?

Looked at the original makefile for bliss. Apparently if you stick to default libbliss.a there is no gmp in it. libbliss_gmp.a would have gmp in it. That being said strange stuff can occasionally happen. François > On 13/12/2015, at 10:24, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Saturday, 12 Decembe

Re: [sage-devel] Bliss bug?

In this particular case on Gentoo we stole patches from fedora to autotool it. Which is why I have a .so. And someone did a copy/paste from another package when autotooling it and forgot to replace some “readline” by “gmp” - oops. I am not even sure how you are supposed to tell pristine bliss if

[sage-devel] Re: Does QS (build/pkgs/flintqs) have an upstream repo?

Sounds reasonable to me as a stop gap solution until something more modern is finalised. It can still in theory fail to factor an integer, so don't rely on it too heavily for anything critical. In practice it's ok, but you know some people get a bit upset about things like that. As things are,

[sage-devel] Re: Does QS (build/pkgs/flintqs) have an upstream repo?

Then how about we make a repo for it in the github.com/sagemath org, any objections? On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 12:56:23 AM UTC+1, Bill Hart wrote: > > No there is no upstream repository for this. > > We had a couple of GSoC students working on the quadratic sieve this year, > but neither

[sage-devel] Re: Does QS (build/pkgs/flintqs) have an upstream repo?

No there is no upstream repository for this. We had a couple of GSoC students working on the quadratic sieve this year, but neither finished the project. We do have someone working on parallel linear algebra for the QS, and so at some point this will initiate some more action in cleaning up the F

Re: [sage-devel] Request for advice : extending/reimplementing the R interface with RPy2 ?

On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 12:44:08 AM UTC+1, William wrote: > > It seems like the official R kernel for Jupyter, which you don't > mention, is relevant: http://irkernel.github.io/ > See also http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19427 : Jupyter R kernel -- You received this message because y

[sage-devel] Does QS (build/pkgs/flintqs) have an upstream repo?

Its makefile does not pass through LDFLAGS amongst others, so that needs fixing. We have been patching around it in a while, the tarball is apparently based on a SVN snapshot from 2007. The SPKG.txt says it is at https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/fastlibnt/trunk/QS but that URL does no long

Re: [sage-devel] Request for advice : extending/reimplementing the R interface with RPy2 ?

On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > Dear list, > > Our current R interface uses pexpect. It is functional, at least from the > command line. > > However, the "%r" magic, working from the command line and the Sage > notebook, cannot be (usefully) used in the Jupyter noteb

Re: [sage-devel] Bliss bug?

On Saturday, December 12, 2015 at 10:24:34 PM UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > indeed, it's static library for me: > $ ls -l local/lib/*blis* > -rw-rw-r-- 1 dima dima 3123674 Nov 10 12:28 local/lib/libbliss.a > Thats correct, and nicely illustrates what a massive liability static libraries are fo

[sage-devel] Request for advice : extending/reimplementing the R interface with RPy2 ?

Dear list, Our current R interface uses pexpect. It is functional, at least from the command line. However, the "%r" magic, working from the command line and the Sage notebook, cannot be (usefully) used in the Jupyter notebook. This has led me to explore what could be done with rpy2 (already p

Re: [sage-devel] Bliss bug?

On Saturday, 12 December 2015 19:11:48 UTC, François wrote: > > > > On 13/12/2015, at 04:07, Dima Pasechnik > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Saturday, 12 December 2015 06:08:29 UTC, Jori Mäntysalo wrote: > > Can someone confirm this? With bliss installed > > > > points = [(1,0,0), (0,1,0), (

Re: [sage-devel] Bliss bug?

> On 13/12/2015, at 04:07, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Saturday, 12 December 2015 06:08:29 UTC, Jori Mäntysalo wrote: > Can someone confirm this? With bliss installed > > points = [(1,0,0), (0,1,0), (0,0,1), (0,0,0), (1,1,0), (1,0,1), (0,1,1), > (1,1,1)] > p = LatticePolytope(points)

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Definition of multifactorial #5415

Thanks .It worked. Please review the changes made. http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/5415 On Friday, December 11, 2015 at 4:43:51 AM UTC+5:30, Nils Bruin wrote: > > On Thursday, December 10, 2015 at 2:25:45 PM UTC-8, prateek sharma wrote: >> >> I had pushed my branch on trac but I am unable to see a

[sage-devel] Re: Bliss bug?

On Saturday, 12 December 2015 06:08:29 UTC, Jori Mäntysalo wrote: > > Can someone confirm this? With bliss installed > > points = [(1,0,0), (0,1,0), (0,0,1), (0,0,0), (1,1,0), (1,0,1), (0,1,1), > (1,1,1)] > p = LatticePolytope(points) > p.face_lattice().canonical_label() > > works for me on

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-edu] Re: Article with beautiful math and pictures by SageMath in Notices

William Stein wrote: >> Copy&paste from pdf is generally troublesome, anything thats not just >> letter+number is likely to cough up unicode stuff. > > Yes. Is there any solution to this, at least is one is created your > own pdf's using latex? \usepackage{cmap} is a good starting point. -- Ma