It is showing in pull requests.Kindly please refer here.
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/52
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:31 AM, Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Sunday, November 1, 2015 at 7:22:37 AM UTC-8, prateek sharma wrote:
>>
>> I have submitted a patch to the issue #5415.
>> Please review.
>>
>
On Sunday, November 1, 2015 at 7:22:37 AM UTC-8, prateek sharma wrote:
>
> I have submitted a patch to the issue #5415.
> Please review.
>
Nothing appears on the ticket. Did you follow the instructions in
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/ to set up a trac account and
submit your change
mpir 2.7.0 compiled just fine using the AUR package. I didn't 'pacman
-Syu' in between.
My previous sage installed upgraded to sage 6.9 with no problem, and
version is 2.7.0, but there was a system upgrade in between.
I don't need to solve this, but I will perform other attempts if it can
help in
On Sunday, 1 November 2015 07:47:05 UTC-7, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>
> > Thats a variant of http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14243
> >
> > In a self-contained build of Sage you probably don't want the bundled R
> to
> > break just because the user also has a different version of R installed
> with
I have submitted a patch to the issue #5415.
Please review.
On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 2:41:59 PM UTC+5:30, prateek sharma wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I am looking for multifactorial function in the source code but unable
> to.Help me out...
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribe
> Thats a variant of http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14243
>
> In a self-contained build of Sage you probably don't want the bundled R to
> break just because the user also has a different version of R installed with
> incompatible config files
>
> A system-wide install of Sage should have R using
Thats a variant of http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14243
In a self-contained build of Sage you probably don't want the bundled R to
break just because the user also has a different version of R installed
with incompatible config files
A system-wide install of Sage should have R using the usual
I don't know the math subject (lattice, poset...)..but...is this paper
interesting ?
www.emis.de/journals/MB/125.2/mb125_2_1.pdf
I only "googled" to get it : I have not checked if random enough, or
theorical prooven or if you can get better paper...
Dominique.
--
You received this message
Does anyone have some algorithm for generating random lattices of size,
say, 15..50 elements? If so, I could code it and maybe add to SageMath.
--
Jori Mäntysalo
