On Friday, June 12, 2015 at 6:27:28 PM UTC-5, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Franco Saliola
> wrote:
> >
> > Here is a mini report on Sage Day 65. I'm not an organizer so this is
> not
> > official.
> > Thanks to Anne Schilling for helping to prepare this.
> >
> If you are asking for ideas, I'm wondering: how hard would it be to
> give the user better information and better options in the case when a
> Sage install fails due to a package?
>
I'll add a +1 for this idea.
I helped Stephen Doty install the development version of Sage on his
machine whi
On Friday, June 12, 2015, Anne Schilling wrote:
> Actually, Peter Tingley's Sage was not working due to some git problems
> (committing on top of the develop branch)! That has been fixed. So it was
> not really an install problem.
>
> The SageMathCloud was great for those who had trouble installi
Actually, Peter Tingley's Sage was not working due to some git problems
(committing on top of the develop branch)! That has been fixed. So it was not
really an install problem.
The SageMathCloud was great for those who had trouble installing Sage on their
own computer. Sometimes we had connecti
- Installation troubles:
>
> - several people had a hard difficult time installing Sage on their
> machines (8-10 people)
>
> - there were people who did not have a working development version on
> their
> machines by the end of the week (4-5 people); two of these people
> w
I have two bright former students who would probably be willing to help.
One is in currently in the CS program at UW and the other will start the
PhD program in math at Berkeley next fall. Both know sandpile theory well
(the former is a co-author), and both have experience using the Sage,
esp
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 1:26 AM, William Stein wrote:
> This is a bummer. It gives me even more motivation to make
> SageMathCloud Sage-developer friendly.I'm also curious if anybody
> has any -- possibly *radical* -- suggestions about how to address this
> problem using new ideas.
+1 for a
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Franco Saliola wrote:
>
> Here is a mini report on Sage Day 65. I'm not an organizer so this is not
> official.
> Thanks to Anne Schilling for helping to prepare this.
>
> - 24 tickets on trac are tagged with `sagedays65` or `sd65`. Some of these
> have
> been po
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 5:34 AM, 'Martin Albrecht' via sage-devel <
sage-devel@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> so, the Singular team *wants* to keep PolyBoRi alive, but it's currently
> not
> clear if and when they *can* devote resources to it. This will be clarified
> over the next few months
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Alexander Dreyer <
jan.alexander.dre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From my point of view a fork - or better call it sequel - would be the
> best.
>
> Unfortunately, all original developers like me went to industrial
> positions, which are completely unrelated to PolyBoRi
Here is a mini report on Sage Day 65. I'm not an organizer so this is not
official.
Thanks to Anne Schilling for helping to prepare this.
- 24 tickets on trac are tagged with `sagedays65` or `sd65`. Some of these
have
been positively reviewed and marked as fixed. Some are waiting for review
(h
2015-06-12 6:18 GMT-03:00 Jeroen Demeyer :
> On 2015-06-11 10:31, Julien Puydt wrote:
>>
>> Open software is about cooperation.
>
> Of course. The question is: what should we do if upstream does not want to
> cooperate? I don't want to call names in this thread, but I have proposed
> patches to man
The following two should succeed:
make ptestlong
make doc-pdf
On Friday, June 12, 2015 at 8:36:39 PM UTC+2, David Perkinson wrote:
>
> One constructive thing I can do, at least, is revise the code to the point
> that patchbot is happy. Up to this point, I have only known of the test
> "sage
One constructive thing I can do, at least, is revise the code to the point
that patchbot is happy. Up to this point, I have only known of the test
"sage -t". All tests passed for my revised code. The problems patchbot
is flagging all seem to be issues with building documentation: indentatio
On Thursday, June 11, 2015 at 12:11:34 PM UTC-7, William wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Francesco Biscani
> > wrote:
> > On 11 June 2015 at 20:13, Travis Scrimshaw > wrote:
> >>
> >>Difficult-to-dechiper can be considered a pro by bigger businesses
> with
> >> proprietry
>
>
> The guideline is not a rule, but it has not been put there for no
> reason either. I have had to do *very* long reviews of a diff that
> wasn't half as long as yours. I certainly would not start another one
> when, from the look of your diff file, the changes are so unrelated
> that you
Dear Categurus!
I would somehow like to move on, so it would be good to know
1) is my question very difficult to answer (and I should go for something
less ambitious) (i.e., takes even a category guru more than 15min to think
about), or
2) is my question hard to understand or silly (and I shou
Also, to revert in the meantime, do
wget
https://launchpad.net/~aims/+archive/ubuntu/sagemath/+build/7499250/+files/sagemath-upstream-binary_6.7ppa10revert6.6.aims6-2_amd64.deb
sudo dpkg -i sagemath-upstream-binary_6.7ppa10revert6.6.aims6-2_amd64.deb
sudo apt-mark hold sagemath-upstream-binary
Re
Hi
The more important drop is the whole src folder, which I think is needed
for rebuilds. We did it to save space and bandwidth, and most importantly
you should not be compiling as root which is necessary to install optional
packages, which we intentially dropped now.. Perhaps a poll on this is
ne
GAP 4.7.8 is out. I opened
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18689
-- Forwarded message --
From: Alexander Konovalov
Date: 2015-06-12 12:00 GMT+02:00
Subject: [GAP] GAP 4.7.8 release
To: gap-dev , GAP Support
, g...@gap-system.org
Dear all,
The 4.7.8 release just happened -
On 2015-06-12 14:32, Julien Puydt wrote:
Nothing will slow development down like dozens of forked packages to
maintain, especially if upstreams consider you hostile.
If you mean "forking" in the serious sense, you're probably right.
If you mean "forking" as in "add a few patches", then you're
On 2015-06-12 14:34, 'Martin Albrecht' via sage-devel wrote:
Hi,
so, the Singular team *wants* to keep PolyBoRi alive, but it's currently not
clear if and when they *can* devote resources to it. This will be clarified
over the next few months it seems.
Doesn't OpenDreamKit help with this?
--
Hi,
so, the Singular team *wants* to keep PolyBoRi alive, but it's currently not
clear if and when they *can* devote resources to it. This will be clarified
over the next few months it seems.
Cheers,
Martin
On Friday 12 Jun 2015 10:14:53 Martin Albrecht wrote:
> I started talking to some peopl
Hi,
Le 12/06/2015 11:18, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
On 2015-06-11 10:31, Julien Puydt wrote:
Open software is about cooperation.
Of course. The question is: what should we do if upstream does not want
to cooperate? I don't want to call names in this thread, but I have
proposed patches to many up
> On 12/06/2015, at 21:18, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2015-06-11 10:31, Julien Puydt wrote:
>> Open software is about cooperation.
> Of course. The question is: what should we do if upstream does not want to
> cooperate? I don't want to call names in this thread, but I have proposed
> patche
On Friday, June 12, 2015, 'Martin Albrecht' via sage-devel <
sage-devel@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> I started talking to some people from the symbolic computation community to
> discuss options (e.g. if someone wants to take over maintenance). Hence,
> don't
> rush to a conclusion please, I'd reall
On 2015-06-11 10:31, Julien Puydt wrote:
Open software is about cooperation.
Of course. The question is: what should we do if upstream does not want
to cooperate? I don't want to call names in this thread, but I have
proposed patches to many upstream projects which are part of Sage
(usually th
I started talking to some people from the symbolic computation community to
discuss options (e.g. if someone wants to take over maintenance). Hence, don't
rush to a conclusion please, I'd really like to keep PolyBoRi around somehow
but don't want to be (sole) maintainer.
Cheers,
Martin
On Thur
28 matches
Mail list logo
