Done http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18424
I need a bit of time to import the patch.
François
> On 15/05/2015, at 18:26, leif wrote:
>
> Francois Bissey wrote:
>> Not the first time it is reported. I have a fix I gave to someone some months
>> ago but forgot to open a ticket to get it fixed in
Francois Bissey wrote:
> Not the first time it is reported. I have a fix I gave to someone some months
> ago but forgot to open a ticket to get it fixed in sage.
> It is fixed in Gentoo
> https://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/sci-mathematics/flint/files/flint-2.4.4-test.patch?vie
leif wrote:
> Laurent Bakri wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> today I tried to compile from source sage6-6 on the linux mint debian
>> edition ( the binary for debian did not work properly for me : no
>> evaluate button in notebook mode the menu buttons not working neither...)
>> I got a pb with flint, don't
Not the first time it is reported. I have a fix I gave to someone some months
ago but forgot to open a ticket to get it fixed in sage.
It is fixed in Gentoo
https://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/sci-mathematics/flint/files/flint-2.4.4-test.patch?view=markup
is what you want.
Yes
Laurent Bakri wrote:
> Hi all,
> today I tried to compile from source sage6-6 on the linux mint debian
> edition ( the binary for debian did not work properly for me : no
> evaluate button in notebook mode the menu buttons not working neither...)
> I got a pb with flint, don't know exactly what i
On Thursday, May 14, 2015 at 2:53:04 PM UTC+2, leif wrote:
>
>
> We need the file
>
>
> /cygdrive/d/sage/sage-6.6/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polybori-0.8.3/src/config.log
>
>
>
> to see why the test failed. (Probably due to a linker error since
> libm4ri uses libpng, but that's shooting into th
I then get:
) failed:
NotImplementedError: subclasses need to impleme
nt this.>
However, as I mentioned above, it makes more sense to use tutte_polynomial
from Graph in my situation (given that its bug has been fixed). So my
problem no longer really exists.
Thanks for the help!
On Thursday
On Thursday, 14 May 2015 21:16:03 UTC+1, David Perkinson wrote:
>
> After putting
>
> import sage.matroids.matroid
>
how about
from sage.matroids.matroid import Matroid
>
> in sandpile.py and running sage -br, I get the following:
>
> sage: f = Sandpile(graphs.CycleGraph(4),0)
> sage: f.t
I guess that since the bug in the tutte_polynomial method for Graph will be
fixed in sage 6.7, I don't need to use the Matroid version anyway.
On Thursday, May 14, 2015 at 1:16:03 PM UTC-7, David Perkinson wrote:
>
> After putting
>
> import sage.matroids.matroid
>
> in sandpile.py and running
After putting
import sage.matroids.matroid
in sandpile.py and running sage -br, I get the following:
sage: f = Sandpile(graphs.CycleGraph(4),0)
sage: f.tutte_polynomial()
---
NameError Traceb
On Thursday, 14 May 2015 19:32:48 UTC+1, David Perkinson wrote:
>
> I am working on sandpile.py and would like to use tutte_polynomial from
> sage/matroids/matroid.pyx. Could someone tell me the correct import
> statement put in sandpile.py?
>
If you import sage.matroids.matroid you can creat
David Perkinson wrote:
> sage: g = Graph()
> sage:
> g.add_edges([(0,1,1),(0,2,1),(0,3,1),(0,4,1),(0,5,1),(1,2,1),(2,3,1),(3,4,1),(4,5,1)])
> sage: g.tutte_polynomial().subs(x=1,y=1)
> 66
> sage: Matroid(g).tutte_polynomial().subs(x=1,y=1)
> 55
>
> sage: f = Graph()
> sage: f.add_edges([(0,1),(0,
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Rob Beezer wrote:
> I'm well into building 6.7.beta5 from source at
>
> https://cloud.sagemath.com/projects/53b77207-8614-4086-a032-432af4b4cdbd/files/sage-dev-images/
>
> and presumably well beyond grabbing packages like bzip2? (Building ecl
> now.)
>
> In an
I am working on sandpile.py and would like to use tutte_polynomial from
sage/matroids/matroid.pyx. Could someone tell me the correct import
statement put in sandpile.py?
Thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe fr
sage: g = Graph()
sage:
g.add_edges([(0,1,1),(0,2,1),(0,3,1),(0,4,1),(0,5,1),(1,2,1),(2,3,1),(3,4,1),(4,5,1)])
sage: g.tutte_polynomial().subs(x=1,y=1)
66
sage: Matroid(g).tutte_polynomial().subs(x=1,y=1)
55
sage: f = Graph()
sage: f.add_edges([(0,1),(0,2),(0,3),(0,4),(0,5),(1,2),(2,3),(3,4),(4,5
On 05/14/2015 12:05 PM, leif wrote:
>
> Well, symlinking the folders in html/en/ on the top level should be
> sufficient.
>
A "RedirectMatch permanent" would be better -- with symlinks, Google
will keep the old URLs around forever (and penalize you for duplicate
content).
--
You received this
kcrisman wrote:
> I did a Google search for something. Guess what?
>
> http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/graphs/sage/graphs/graph_latex.html
>
> 404 not found
>
> Basically, EVERYTHING that anyone will link to that isn't just
> sagemath.org/doc will give a 404. There must be a lot of such
> I did a Google search for something. Guess what?
>
> http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/graphs/sage/graphs/graph_latex.html
>
>
Sorry, my main point was that Google has the broken link as its top
recommendation, and may not find out where to update for some time.
--
You received this me
I did a Google search for something. Guess what?
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/graphs/sage/graphs/graph_latex.html
404 not found
Basically, EVERYTHING that anyone will link to that isn't just
sagemath.org/doc will give a 404. There must be a lot of such links around.
Also, http://doc
>
> The other general issue is related to managing files, the release
> process and the workflow as the whole group. Volker is in contact with
> me, but even the smallest silent assumptions or misunderstandings lead
> to hiccups. Only when it breaks you realize which elements were vital
> and
Putranto Hadi wrote:
> I have a problem in installing sage-6.6 on cygwin64.
> Everything was going fine until sage told me that polybori package
> failed to build.
> in the log (attached), it says that there is no m4ri library. But i am
> pretty sure that m4ri already installed, as the log says (al
Hi,
I have a problem in installing sage-6.6 on cygwin64.
Everything was going fine until sage told me that polybori package failed
to build.
in the log (attached), it says that there is no m4ri library. But i am
pretty sure that m4ri already installed, as the log says (also attached).
I also al
On Thursday, 14 May 2015 07:10:10 UTC+1, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> > Really?! Are you saying that looking at standard/*/ is more inconvenient
> > than looking at */* and checking that a file there says standard (or
> have a
> > file
> > named standard) ?
>
> It may not be more con
Thanks for the update. Since the prospective Singular user does not
know Sage at all he will not be able to help with that ticket; and I
don't know Singular at all.
John
On 13 May 2015 at 22:45, leif wrote:
> John Cremona wrote:
>> Is anyone planning to update the version of Singular used
24 matches
Mail list logo
