Yes, I've sent a request for details to Sven.
For two months there will be (in a week, I hope) also a GCE instance
running, we'll see what happens after that.
Andrey
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 7:06 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
>>
>> we offer two machines located in our data center (Opteron 270 with 16G
> we offer two machines located in our data center (Opteron 270 with 16GB
> RAM and .5TB HDD each) to host the Sage cell server.
>
> Bye from Frankfurt/Germany,
> Sven
>
Danke!
William, Andrey - habt ihr das gesehen? I mean, did you see this offer?
--
You received this message because yo
On 04/23/2015 04:56 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>>
>> Can't we work with upstream (the authors) to package these?
> For starters, none of these seem very active projects. In particular,
> hyperellfrob and bernmm have their last release in 2008 and 2009.
>
> Second, what if the authors don't care?
>
On 2015-04-22 20:17, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 04/22/2015 07:57 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
Hello,
The directory
src/sage/graphs/planarity_c/
is really a copy of an external package
https://code.google.com/p/planarity/
Similarly,
src/sage/graphs/graph_decompositions/rankwidth_c
is really a copy
Hello ?
*Who is running eddy* ? Please ? A French person, it seems.
By the way, please patchbot owners, register yourself here :
http://wiki.sagemath.org/buildbot/owners
Frederic
By the way, I think patchbot runner could enlist themselves
Le mercredi 22 avril 2015 20:53:07 UTC+2, Frédéric Ch
>From what I've been told, we have _an_element_ inorder for an_element to do
some caching, but with the advancements of our cached_method decorators,
this shouldn't be necessary. IIRC, we are moving/have moved away from using
an_element() in the coercion framework, so it shouldn't need to be cac
On 2015-04-23 10:34, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
sage: %runfile test_file.py
Mind the preparser!
You are probably computing binomial(102,20) which takes less than 0.5
seconds to compute.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubsc
Hi Vincent,
On 2015-04-23, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My is guess that:
> - all parents should define `_an_element_`
+1. Note the similarity with Python special methods: We provide a
default implementation for an_element (resp. for __add__), and the default
implement
Hello,
In sage we have four ways if I count correctly to make `an_element`
works in a parent:
- defining an_element directly
- defining _an_element_
- defining _an_element_impl
- defining _an_element_c_impl
The winner are the two first with roughly 40% and 80% of the
implementations in Sa
>
> A miracle: I checked out ticket #17760, rebuild, now it works also in
> firefox.
>
Praise the Lord!!!
Nathann
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
A miracle: I checked out ticket #17760, rebuild, now it works also in
firefox.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@google
On 19/04/15 12:49, Marc Mezzarobba wrote: > On my machine, sage -t
--verbose src/sage/rings/integer.pyx blocks on:
>
> Trying (line 6089):alarm(0.5); (2^100).binomial(2^22,
algorithm='pari')
> Expecting:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> ...
> AlarmInterrupt
>
> Is that
Let me summarize:
firefox with sage 6.5 is OK
firefox with sage develop is not OK
konqueror is OK with both.
???
Martin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e
13 matches
Mail list logo
