Those are files generated by cython - they should be in .gitignore.
François
> On 16/03/2015, at 18:24, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>
> Hey everyone,
>After upgrading to 6.6.beta5, I get the following list of untracked files
> from git status:
>
> # Untracked files:
> # (use "git add ..." t
Hey everyone,
After upgrading to 6.6.beta5, I get the following list of untracked
files from git status:
# Untracked files:
# (use "git add ..." to include in what will be committed)
#
#src/sage/algebras/letterplace/free_algebra_element_letterplace.cpp
#src/sage/algebras/letterplace/
Le 15/03/2015 21:16, Simon King a écrit :
Hi Vincent,
On 2015-03-15, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
But in that very particular case, just evaluating the string
representation in GAP gives you back the same group
Yes, "in *that* very particular case". So, it is not pos
Hi Vincent,
On 2015-03-15, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But in that very particular case, just evaluating the string
> representation in GAP gives you back the same group
Yes, "in *that* very particular case". So, it is not possible to make a
*general* pickling method fo
But in that very particular case, just evaluating the string
representation in GAP gives you back the same group
sage: s = "Group([ [ [ 1, 1 ], [ 0, 1 ] ], [ [ 1, 0 ], [ 1, 1 ] ] ])"
sage: G = libgap.eval(s)
sage: str(G) == s
True
sage: G == libgap.eval(s)
True
Is it better/safer to always raise
We should show a better error message
But afaik GAP doesn't have a pickling feature apart from saving the entire
workspace, so there is little we can do about it.
On Sunday, March 15, 2015 at 12:16:28 PM UTC+1, vdelecroix wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to implement a native SL(n,Z) in Sage
Hi Patrick
If you have time to help us isolate it, please download the binary
http://www.sagemath.org/download.html and test that,
(the PPA just repackages that) so that we know whether it is the binary or
introduced by the PPA in certain configurations.
Regards,
Jan
On 15 March 2015 at 15:59, p
Dear Jeroen,
The order of strong order tableaux does not really matter.
One place where it might slightly matter might be in character
tables of the symmetric group. As far as I remember they are just
matrices where rows and columns are indexed by integers rather than
by partitions. In this case
cc: sage-combinat-devel
2015-03-15 11:27:33 UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer:
>
> Hello,
>
> currently in Sage, Partitions() are returned in reverse-lexicographic
> order. But is this order (which is nowhere documented as far as I can
> tell) really important? I am trying to fix Partitions and other relat
Hello,
I am trying to implement a native SL(n,Z) in Sage using our dense
matrices. But while factoring some code in sage.groups.matrix_gps I
ran into
sage: G = libgap.eval("Group([ [ [ 1, 1 ], [ 0, 1 ] ], [ [ 1, 0 ], [
1, 1 ] ] ])")
sage: loads(dumps(G))
Traceback (most recent call last)
...
Attr
Hello,
currently in Sage, Partitions() are returned in reverse-lexicographic
order. But is this order (which is nowhere documented as far as I can
tell) really important? I am trying to fix Partitions and other related
functions in #17920. This works fine but the order of the output is
change
Can someone please change something at this dummy ticket:
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14974
I am testing if I am still subscribed there.
Thanks,
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receivin
12 matches
Mail list logo
