[sage-devel] Re: Polydict, ETuple, and large exponents

2015-03-12 Thread Marc Mezzarobba
Bruno Grenet wrote: > My questions: Is my understanding correct? If not, what are supposed > these arguments to be for? And if I understand correctly, is the > behavior I mention a bug? I'd say you are right, and the reason for the bug is that ETuple changed after Polydict was written. Compare 5c

[sage-devel] Polydict, ETuple, and large exponents

2015-03-12 Thread Bruno Grenet
Dear all, I am trying to implement a class of polynomials with very large exponents. For this, I'd like to reuse the functionalities offered by sage/rings/polynomial/polydict.pyx. The __init__ method of the class PolyDict has arguments force_int_exponents and force_etuples that I don't fully

Re: [sage-devel] Re: 'git trac' instructions for rebasing/merging

2015-03-12 Thread Daniel Krenn
Am 2015-03-12 um 10:51 schrieb Nathann Cohen: >> There is nothing specific to our git setup as far as merging and rebasing is >> concerned. So there is no need to reinvent a git-trac wheel here, its just >> about making communicating with trac easier. > > I was thinking of some entry like "Merging

Re: [sage-devel] Re: 'git trac' instructions for rebasing/merging

2015-03-12 Thread Nathann Cohen
Hello, > Where & when do you see something in red? Sorry, I was talking of the trac ticket. Here is one for instance: http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16534 There is some comment here about it there: http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/trac.html#the-ticket-fields Nathann -- You received this

Re: [sage-devel] Re: 'git trac' instructions for rebasing/merging

2015-03-12 Thread John Cremona
On 12 March 2015 at 09:51, Nathann Cohen wrote: > Hell ! > >> There is nothing specific to our git setup as far as merging and rebasing is >> concerned. So there is no need to reinvent a git-trac wheel here, its just >> about making communicating with trac easier. > > I was thinking of som

Re: [sage-devel] Re: 'git trac' instructions for rebasing/merging

2015-03-12 Thread Nathann Cohen
Hell ! > There is nothing specific to our git setup as far as merging and rebasing is > concerned. So there is no need to reinvent a git-trac wheel here, its just > about making communicating with trac easier. I was thinking of some entry like "Merging with the latest release (i.e. what s

[sage-devel] Re: 'git trac' instructions for rebasing/merging

2015-03-12 Thread Volker Braun
There is nothing specific to our git setup as far as merging and rebasing is concerned. So there is no need to reinvent a git-trac wheel here, its just about making communicating with trac easier. On Thursday, March 12, 2015 at 8:28:45 AM UTC+1, Nathann Cohen wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > I

[sage-devel] Re: White-haired needs_review tickets

2015-03-12 Thread Nathann Cohen
Helloo ! I was pondering moving them en-masse to needs_info, but that's obviously > neither a very helpful nor tactful way to handle things, so I prefer > discussing the matter here. > It may be a good decision for some tickets, but it could be dangerous for some others, like bugfixes

[sage-devel] Re: the packing method in IncidenceStructure class

2015-03-12 Thread brettpim
Somehow I thought I had lost a previous post so I posted it again, but then I found the post: it had been minimized on screen while the first two posts were not minimized. clearly I am still learning this Google Groups interface -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the G

[sage-devel] 'git trac' instructions for rebasing/merging

2015-03-12 Thread Nathann Cohen
Hello everybody, I just noticed that we do not seem to have in our developer's manual instructions about how to rebase/merge a branch when it becomes incompatible with the latest beta. I do not use 'git trac' myself, but it would be cool if anybody who does could add such an entry in the develope