Hi
I'm not sure, but perhaps if you change this:
0 root@muizenberg:/usr/lib/
sagemath/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages#grep -r SSLv23 *
sagenb-0.11.1-py2.7.egg/sagenb/notebook/run_notebook.py:
ssl_context = SSL.Context(SSL.SSLv23_METHOD)
to
ssl_context = ssl.SSLContext(ssl.PROTOCOL_TLSv1)
See
On Thu, 4 Dec 2014, Jan Groenewald wrote:
Depend on the proper version high enough of openssl and it is fixed for you.
(assuming sage server side)
On client side your browser, say, firefox34, latest chrome, it is fixed.
What situation is this for? A server for Tampere university? What
version
Weird to answer your own thread, but I think that we are bad for plots.
Look at that:
sage: graphs.RandomTree(40).show()
sage: graphs.RandomTree(40).show(method="js")
The first one is a picture, the second uses d3.js. You can do a lot of
crazy things with it, and it is done in javascript:
http
Helloo everybody !
I am preparing some Sage talk, and I wanted to say at some point: "Honestly
we are not that good. We have strong points but we miss many things too. It
all depends on what the developpers are interested in: we are great on some
research areas, and under water level on others
Hi
https://docs.python.org/2.7/library/ssl.html#ssl.OP_NO_SSLv3
says "New in version 2.7.9" and it looks like sage runs 2.7.8 (sage-sh)
root@muizenberg:python2.7$ python --version
Python 2.7.8
Once 2.7.9 is included, I think we can add here, for example:
0
root@muizenberg:/usr/lib/sagemath/loc
We already have
matrix.apply_map
matrix.apply_morphism
The name of the methods are really ambiguous since they apply the map
(or the morphism) to the coefficients and not to the matrix. But not
for this ticket...
#17443 needs review again.
Vincent
--
You received this message because you ar
Hello everybody:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:53 AM, Nathann Cohen
wrote:
> Hello !
>
> > That's right. Do you (or any of the authors of this book...) know whether
> > an English/German/Spanish/... translation or a similar project in another
> > language is planned? That could be a good way to show
Less time, at least in the short term. But I think I can keep doing the
release management for now.
On Thursday, December 4, 2014 2:45:10 PM UTC, William wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Volker Braun > wrote:
> > As some of you have heard, I'm about to move to Berlin to pursue som
Its not permitted by Apple. Whether it is legally enforceable depends on
the jurisdiction. In Germany the Apple EULA is most likely not legally
binding.
On Thursday, December 4, 2014 2:38:18 PM UTC, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On 2014-12-01, Volker Braun > wrote:
> > --=_Part_3157_104077680
On Thursday, December 4, 2014 3:38:18 PM UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On 2014-12-01, Volker Braun > wrote:
> > --=_Part_3157_1040776803.1417466369538
> > Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> > boundary="=_Part_3158_1081423206.1417466369539"
> >
> > --=_Part_3158_108
>
> > Just curious on how that may have come along. At least for the notebook
> it
> > would be great to have some additional localization - and it would be a
> good
> > step toward localizing the cloud, or Sage proper, etc.
>
> I would love to do Hindi and Punjabi translations(Indian Langua
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> As some of you have heard, I'm about to move to Berlin to pursue some
> opportunities outside of academia.
Will this opportunity mean more or less time to work on Sage? In
particular, are you still going to have time to do some release
manag
>
>
>
> Depend on the proper version high enough of openssl and it is fixed for
> you. (assuming sage server side)
> On client side your browser, say, firefox34, latest chrome, it is fixed.
>
>
What situation is this for? A server for Tampere university? What version
> of openssl runs on which
On 2014-12-01, Volker Braun wrote:
> --=_Part_3157_1040776803.1417466369538
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="=_Part_3158_1081423206.1417466369539"
>
> --=_Part_3158_1081423206.1417466369539
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> As some of you have heard
Hi
Depend on the proper version high enough of openssl and it is fixed for
you. (assuming sage server side)
On client side your browser, say, firefox34, latest chrome, it is fixed.
What situation is this for? A server for Tampere university? What version
of openssl runs on which OS?
PS. I stayed
Anyone knows how for fix SSLv3 hole on Sage? See
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17164 .
--
Jori Mäntysalo
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17438
>
This is now ready. Let's do some mutual review.
First, not all expressions are polynomial expressions!
>
Indeed, one reason I'm interested in this is symbolic power series:
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17399
Also, why such a hurry to remove stuff i
On 2014-12-04 10:33, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
It is not exactly what we want... the error message would be "absolute
value not defined for matrices".
Well, the Sage convention seems to be to generalise ArithmeticError to
include undefined mathematical operations, like factor(0). Of course,
with
2014-12-04 10:22 UTC+01:00, Jeroen Demeyer :
> On 2014-12-04 10:04, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
>> All right, but in that case I would prefer that there is no __abs__ at
>> all. What about deprecating its usage and later on return a ValueError?
> Surely not a ValueError! I could live with any of Arith
On 2014-12-04 10:04, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
All right, but in that case I would prefer that there is no __abs__ at
all. What about deprecating its usage and later on return a ValueError?
Surely not a ValueError! I could live with any of ArithmeticError,
AttributeError, NotImplementedError and
Hello,
> >> abs(matrix) is currently returning the determinant (and this goes back
> >> to the early implementation in 2006!). If anybody contests the fact
> >> that it should return the matrix whose entries are the absolute value
> >> of the initial matrix, please tell me.
> >
> > I don't
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:13 AM, Vincent Delecroix
<20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2014-12-04 9:32 UTC+01:00, David Roe :
>>> abs(matrix) is currently returning the determinant (and this goes back
>>> to the early implementation in 2006!). If anybody contests the fact
>>> that it should return
2014-12-04 9:32 UTC+01:00, David Roe :
>> abs(matrix) is currently returning the determinant (and this goes back
>> to the early implementation in 2006!). If anybody contests the fact
>> that it should return the matrix whose entries are the absolute value
>> of the initial matrix, please tell me.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:04 AM, Vincent Delecroix
<20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> 2014-12-04 9:54 UTC+01:00, Simon King :
> (posted on sage-support)
>> Hi Vincent,
>>
>> On 2014-12-04, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> sage: M = matrix(RR, [[-1]])
>>> sage:
Hi Simon,
2014-12-04 9:54 UTC+01:00, Simon King :
(posted on sage-support)
> Hi Vincent,
>
> On 2014-12-04, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> sage: M = matrix(RR, [[-1]])
>> sage: abs(M)
>> -1.00
>>
>> So the problem is with abs(M). The reason is that abs(M) is ca
Hi!
On 2014-12-04, David Roe wrote:
> I don't think that it should be the matrix consisting of absolute
> values of entries, since that only works for matrices over a ring with
> an absolute value. Using
> it as a determinant is consistent with standard notation, though I
> agree that we don't u
> abs(matrix) is currently returning the determinant (and this goes back
> to the early implementation in 2006!). If anybody contests the fact
> that it should return the matrix whose entries are the absolute value
> of the initial matrix, please tell me.
I don't think that it should be the matrix
27 matches
Mail list logo
