Hello !
> That's right. Do you (or any of the authors of this book...) know whether
> an English/German/Spanish/... translation or a similar project in another
> language is planned? That could be a good way to show teachers that Sage is
> well-suited for classes.
Kanappan wanted to work on an en
2014-12-01 7:44 GMT+01:00 William Stein :
> Paul Zimmerman did a huge amount in that direction with the French
> book he edited on Sage for undergrad teaching (which was a huge
> project).
>
That's right. Do you (or any of the authors of this book...) know whether
an English/German/Spanish/... tr
Yo !
> :-) You're right -- I guess after 10 years, I'm starting to seriously lose my
> patience.
I believe that we should be allowed to lose our patience after 10
years. 6 months seems to be a lot already.
> Gregory Bard did a lot this year in that direction though, with his book.
>
>
> Paul Zim
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> "1) Be friendly and patient." (sorry can't resist)
:-) You're right -- I guess after 10 years, I'm starting to seriously
lose my patience.
> I would say that most of us are only using Sage for research, and that
> we are not the kind of d
On Mon, 1 Dec 2014, Nathann Cohen wrote:
How would you attract teachers here ? How would you convince them that
Sage is THE tool for teaching ? (no mention of research)
1) Whole error reporting should be changed. "1+2+" and "(1+(2+3)" should
give meaningful (and different) error message like
Hello !
> Do any of you care? Are you doing anything that will make Sage get
> any closer to its mission statement?
"1) Be friendly and patient." (sorry can't resist)
I would say that most of us are only using Sage for research, and that
we are not the kind of developpers who will fulfull your
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 10:13 PM, rjf wrote:
>
>
> On Sunday, November 30, 2014 9:03:39 PM UTC-8, William wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 8:14 PM, rjf wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, November 18, 2014 1:35:21 PM UTC-8, William wrote:
See this interesting document:
>>>
On Sunday, November 30, 2014 9:03:39 PM UTC-8, William wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 8:14 PM, rjf >
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, November 18, 2014 1:35:21 PM UTC-8, William wrote:
>>>
>>> See this interesting document:
>>>
>>>http://www.maplesoft.com/products/maple/compare/
>>>
On 27 Nov 2014 20:51, "maldun" wrote:
> I personally a comparison of sage with the other Systems is quite hard,
since all of the other 4Ms concentrate more or less
> on particular fields of mathematic (e.g. Matlab focus on numerics,
Mathematica more on Calculus etc.)
> Sage is far from perfect bu
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 8:14 PM, rjf wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, November 18, 2014 1:35:21 PM UTC-8, William wrote:
>>
>> See this interesting document:
>>
>>http://www.maplesoft.com/products/maple/compare/
>> HowMapleComparestoMathematica.pdf
>>
>> Thanks for pointing it out. For a marketing d
On Tuesday, November 18, 2014 1:35:21 PM UTC-8, William wrote:
>
> See this interesting document:
>
>
> http://www.maplesoft.com/products/maple/compare/HowMapleComparestoMathematica.pdf
>
>
> Thanks for pointing it out. For a marketing document it is not too bad,
but
it is still a market
In sage-on-gentoo I don't seem to hit that problem with 4.9.2
either. I am really curious about your default building flags.
Francois
On Mon, 01 Dec 2014 12:51:50 François Bissey wrote:
> Very strange I don't have it in sage-on-gentoo.
> objdump -T --demangle /usr/lib64/libcsage.so |grep ZZ_p_t
Very strange I don't have it in sage-on-gentoo.
objdump -T --demangle /usr/lib64/libcsage.so |grep ZZ_p_to_int
9320 gDF .text 000e BaseZZ_p_to_int
sage -v
Sage Version 6.5.beta1, Release Date: 2014-11-23
We had a few issue with C++ ompiling during the upgra
Hi, I have created a ticket two weeks ago and until now I have received no
response. Here is the link
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17351#ticket
Maybe you can help me.
On Tuesday, November 11, 2014 12:15:51 PM UTC+1, Martin Albrecht wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 11 Nov 2014 02:43:19 Joe ouni wrote:
>
We just upgraded NTL, the new version should be better with C++: Trac
#16882.
Having said that, I didn't have any problems compiling Sage-6.4.1 on Fedora
21. It might be that your toolchain is too bleeding-edge...
On Sunday, November 30, 2014 1:44:11 PM UTC, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
w
I think this may have been working somewhat of by accident
before, because it says 'extern "C"' in one place and in another
say '// sorry, if you want a C version, feel free to add it'
I delayed a bit sagemath 6.4 update due to some dependencies
needing to be updated in Fedora, in the meantime
You want this one:
sage: R. = QQ[]
sage: (x^2+2*y+1).dict()
{(0, 0): 1, (0, 1): 2, (2, 0): 1}
On Sunday, November 30, 2014 8:06:28 AM UTC, rjf wrote:
>
> maybe this could be added.
> A method called something like ExponentCoeffPairsExcludingZeros,
> which would return a list of pairs, in so
maybe this could be added.
A method called something like ExponentCoeffPairsExcludingZeros,
which would return a list of pairs, in some exponent
order.
Maybe that's inconvenient in Python/sympy.
RJF
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-de
18 matches
Mail list logo
