On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Jonas Jermann wrote:
> Hi Robert
>
>
> On 30.08.2014 07:48, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
I'm not sure (as mentioned the pushout construction is complex and
there are many cases). But yes, that might work:
Do a/several coercion check(s) _during_ pushou
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 11:49:10 UTC+2, Viviane Pons wrote:
>
> From what I understand, nobody here is saying what *should* be but more
> how it is. I think the debate on whether people support one way or another
> is mostly irrelevant here, even so, I do understand the frustration and I
>
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 11:52:48 UTC+2, Harald Schilly wrote:
>
> That escalated quickly …
>
> > On Friday, August 29, 2014 12:46:14 PM UTC+2, Bill Hart wrote:
> > Why is this important? Because otherwise you would be taking European
> money and using it to fund a project which originated in
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 10:47:08 UTC+2, wstein wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Bill Hart > wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Saturday, 30 August 2014 00:35:01 UTC+2, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 5:03 AM, Bill Hart
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Friday, 29
Hi Robert
On 30.08.2014 07:48, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
I'm not sure (as mentioned the pushout construction is complex and
there are many cases). But yes, that might work:
Do a/several coercion check(s) _during_ pushout (during the while loop
starting at line 3210) if needed instead of only at the
That escalated quickly …
> On Friday, August 29, 2014 12:46:14 PM UTC+2, Bill Hart wrote:
> Why is this important? Because otherwise you would be taking European
money and using it to fund a project which originated in the US (I think it
fair to call it a US project).
Remember Nov 23rd, 2009 (
>From what I understand, nobody here is saying what *should* be but more how
it is. I think the debate on whether people support one way or another is
mostly irrelevant here, even so, I do understand the frustration and I do
think myself that all this national stuff is quite stupid.
Anyway, here's
Bart S wrote:
> Most SPKGs seem to install binaries that are then called from existing
> Sage code. Are there also examples of SPKGs that installs Python code
> that integrates with Sage (like adding a new module)?
The ore_algebra spkg adds a Python module ore_algebra (NOT
sage.ore_algebra, thoug
William A Stein wrote:
> What's the situation with speed regression testing in Sage? A couple
> of years ago I think people wrote a regression testing framework
> (maybe David Roe or Robert Bradshaw?)
FWIW I started a little bit of work aiming to make the existing
benchmarking code more useful a
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Bill Hart wrote:
>
>
> On Saturday, 30 August 2014 00:35:01 UTC+2, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 5:03 AM, Bill Hart
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Friday, 29 August 2014 13:17:40 UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote:
>> >>
>> >> First of all, it always sadden
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 00:35:01 UTC+2, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 5:03 AM, Bill Hart > wrote:
> >
> > On Friday, 29 August 2014 13:17:40 UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote:
> >>
> >> First of all, it always saddens me when the ugly head of nationalism
> rears
> >> its h
Hi Tomer,
On 2014-08-29, TB wrote:
> My name is Tomer Bauer and I am a Ph.D. student at Bar-Ilan
> University. As I am quiet enthusiastic about Sage (my trac
> username is mathzeta2), the CoGrAl2015 workshop sounds great.
Note that the workshop is not *centered* around Sage (in
12 matches
Mail list logo
