[sage-devel] ticket 12455 inaccessible

2014-07-19 Thread Ralf Stephan
Hello, http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12455 gives me *Trac detected an internal error:* OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/tmp/tmpfcOFO7' Could an admin please have a look? Regards, -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" grou

[sage-devel] Re: weird integral behavior

2014-07-19 Thread Anne Schilling
Dear Nils, Thanks for your answer! Even if the symbolic integration techniques that maxima uses cannot tackle this problem, it would be good if the computer could somehow catch that there is a problem instead of returning the wrong answer. Best wishes, Anne On 7/19/14 6:33 PM, Nils Bruin wrote:

Re: [sage-devel] Re: flint revert_series

2014-07-19 Thread Jonas Jermann
Hi On 19.07.2014 23:48, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: I can have a look next week. Thanks! Would you mind opening a ticket on trac for this? http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16685 Best Jonas On Saturday, July 19, 2014 8:10:33 PM UTC+2, Jonas Jermann wrote: Hi all Could someone

[sage-devel] Re: Build from 6.2 tarball fails on both CentOS 6.5 and SuSE 13.1

2014-07-19 Thread John H Palmieri
On Saturday, July 19, 2014 2:47:12 PM UTC-7, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > Or just to become patient enough to wait for the first MPIR configure run > whose output is redirect into a file for further analysis to finish :) > Telepathy would be nice though. > Maybe the MPIR spkg-install file shoul

[sage-devel] Re: flint revert_series

2014-07-19 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
I can have a look next week. Would you mind opening a ticket on trac for this? On Saturday, July 19, 2014 8:10:33 PM UTC+2, Jonas Jermann wrote: > > Hi all > > Could someone familiar with flint/sage enable flint's > revert_series (for rational/integer polynomials)? > > (Sorry if it was already

[sage-devel] Re: Build from 6.2 tarball fails on both CentOS 6.5 and SuSE 13.1

2014-07-19 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
Or just to become patient enough to wait for the first MPIR configure run whose output is redirect into a file for further analysis to finish :) Telepathy would be nice though. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from t

Re: [sage-devel] On scientific computing, Python and Julia

2014-07-19 Thread Stefan Karpinski
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Nils Bruin wrote: > Consider A+B where A is a polynomial in ZZ[x,y] and B is a power series in > F_q[[x]] (finite field with q elements). > > Do you expect your CAS to make sense of that addition? Sage does. It > returns an answer in F_q[[x]][y] (i.e., a polynomia

[sage-devel] Re: Build from 6.2 tarball fails on both CentOS 6.5 and SuSE 13.1

2014-07-19 Thread Volker Braun
OS? Compiler version? I guess we'll first have to develop telepathy within six months. On Saturday, July 19, 2014 10:49:50 AM UTC-4, deSitter wrote: > > Hangs at the message > > "Checking what CFLAGS MPIR would use if they were empty" > > Must be manually interrupted. > > I check Sage every six

[sage-devel] Re: Solving rational inequality should give simplified result

2014-07-19 Thread Robert Pollak
On Monday, July 1, 2013 11:37:02 AM UTC+2, I wrote: > > solve(abs((x-1)/(x-5)) <= 1/3, x) > [...] > The main issue is that the result should be > > [[-1 <= x, x <= 2]] > I have found a way to get this! A little term massaging gives me the equivalent: sage: qepcad((x-1)^2 <= (1/3)^2 * (x-5)^2

Re: [sage-devel] On scientific computing, Python and Julia

2014-07-19 Thread Stefan Karpinski
Hi Sage folks! I gave that presentation on multiple dispatch at Strange Loop last year. Since someone pointed this thread out to me and the topic of multiple dispatch and type promotion is near and dear to my heart, I thought I'd chime in. Maybe my comments will be of some use. (Btw, since some

[sage-devel] flint revert_series

2014-07-19 Thread Jonas Jermann
Hi all Could someone familiar with flint/sage enable flint's revert_series (for rational/integer polynomials)? (Sorry if it was already implemented somewhere and I missed it). Attached is a small, non-intrusive patch (done with help from IRC) in that direction which simply adds series reversion

[sage-devel] Re: weird integral behavior

2014-07-19 Thread Nils Bruin
On Saturday, July 19, 2014 9:25:42 AM UTC-7, Anne Schilling wrote: > > Sage can solve this numerically: > > sage: g = lambda x : (1+e^(2*pi*I*x)).abs() > sage: numerical_integral(g,0,1) > (1.2732395447351625, 1.4155343563970746e-14) > sage: n(4/pi) > 1.27323954473516 > > but not symbolically:

[sage-devel] weird integral behavior

2014-07-19 Thread Anne Schilling
Hi! David Bailey (http://www.davidhbailey.com/) showed Viviane, Travis, and myself the following oddity yesterday. Take the integral \int_0^1 \int_0^1 |e^{2\pi i x} + e^{2\pi i y}| dx dy The answer should be 4/\pi. Both Mathematica and Maple give 0 as an answer. Unfortunately, Sage/Maxima als

Re: [sage-devel] On scientific computing, Python and Julia

2014-07-19 Thread Nils Bruin
On Saturday, July 19, 2014 5:43:57 AM UTC-7, defeo wrote: > However, Julia multimethods are backed up by a powerful coercion > system, so I do not understand the "step back" criticism. > > That comment wasn't made with respect to Julia, because that would be comparing the coercion facilities of

[sage-devel] Build from 6.2 tarball fails on both CentOS 6.5 and SuSE 13.1

2014-07-19 Thread deSitter
Hangs at the message "Checking what CFLAGS MPIR would use if they were empty" Must be manually interrupted. I check Sage every six months only to find that is still never builds correctly. Maybe a new approach is needed. It's sort of comical at this point. Then again, good mathers are usually

Re: [sage-devel] On scientific computing, Python and Julia

2014-07-19 Thread Luca De Feo
> I'm not sure multimethods alone are enough to solve issues with Sage's > type system (e.g. coercion, where the result of a+b may happen in a > completely new domain) but they could certainly help. I purposedly said "many", and not "all", nor even "most". The most important feature to a CAS missi