On 2014-01-13 17:16, Simon King wrote:
On 2014-01-13, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
It was deprecated since 3 years and removed.
Use sig_on() and sig_off() instead.
Thanks! I suppose using sig_on() will work on any Sage version that is
younger than 2 years old, then? I want that my spkg not only buil
On Monday, January 13, 2014 4:32:10 PM UTC-8, Gregory Bard wrote:
>
> Hi everyone. I might be confused but I think I've found something not
> quite right.
>
> The following code:
>
> ###
> a(x) = x^2 - 5*x + 6
> b(x) = x^2 - 8*x + 15
>
For polynomial arithmetic, you're
http://www.sagemath.org/download-source.html doesn't mention git, but does
contain a link to hg.sagemath.org. It would be great if somebody could
update that page.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group an
Hi everyone. I might be confused but I think I've found something not quite
right.
The following code:
###
a(x) = x^2 - 5*x + 6
b(x) = x^2 - 8*x + 15
f(x) = lcm( a(x), b(x) )
print f
print f.rational_simplify()
###
produces the output
On Sun, 12 Jan 2014 21:15:21 Volker Braun wrote:
> At the risk of veering even further off-topic, I would like to give up
> "tree relocation" as it is currently defined. Its cumbersome (need to check
> that we haven't been moved all the time) and insecure.
>
> For relocatable binaries, we build wi
On 01/12/2014 02:06 PM, Felix Salfelder wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 01:09:42PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> Prefix is designed to run as an ordinary user on non-gentoo systems. If
>> you're on gentoo, you don't need it (unless you don't have root). Plenty
>> of us have been able to get it
On 2014-01-13, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> It was deprecated since 3 years and removed.
> Use sig_on() and sig_off() instead.
Thanks! I suppose using sig_on() will work on any Sage version that is
younger than 2 years old, then? I want that my spkg not only builds on
the latest Sage version.
Best re
On 2014-01-13 16:54, Simon King wrote:
Another question: Has something happened with _sig_on?
It was deprecated since 3 years and removed.
Use sig_on() and sig_off() instead.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from th
On 2014-01-13, Simon King wrote:
> Is SAGE_INCLUDE missing?
Another question: Has something happened with _sig_on? Now, after fixing
the paths (so that interrupt.pxi can be included), _sig_on can not be
found.
Best regards,
Simon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the G
I've once again wasted days trying to debug something on SPARC until I
realized that debug builds just segfault left and right. Steps to reproduce:
CFLAGS='-O0 -g' ./sage -f pari
sage -bt src/sage/libs/pari # lots of segfaults
How can we compile with debugging information? And if not, how can
Hi Jeroen,
On 2014-01-13, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> I would start by trying to fix the hardcoded paths in src/setup.py in
> your package (using SAGE_SRC).
I see: There are more variables than SAGE_SRC: SAGE_LOCAL, SAGE_EXTCODE,
...
Is SAGE_INCLUDE missing?
Best regards,
Simon
--
You received
Hi Jeroen,
On 2014-01-13, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> I would start by trying to fix the hardcoded paths in src/setup.py in
> your package (using SAGE_SRC).
By "hardcoded", you mean the paths relative to SAGE_ROOT? So, replacing
SAGE_ROOT by SAGE_SRC would solve the problem (in most cases at least)
On 2014-01-13 14:10, Simon King wrote:
Hi!
My optional p_group_cohomology spkg does not install with sage-6.1.b4.
Problem (for now): The package contains Cython code, and in some .pxd
files I do
include "interupt.pxi"
This used to work, but fails now.
I see that in the sage sources some .p
Hi!
My optional p_group_cohomology spkg does not install with sage-6.1.b4.
Problem (for now): The package contains Cython code, and in some .pxd
files I do
include "interupt.pxi"
This used to work, but fails now.
I see that in the sage sources some .pxd files do
include "sage/ext/inte
Hi,
since myopenid will be hinstory soon, see [1] "MYOPENID WILL BE TURNED
OFF ON 2/1/2014", I have to find a different method for signing in into
ask.sagemath.org. Is there a a way to change this (keeping my profile)?
Maybe I over-looked it.
BTW: From mathoverflow.net and stackexchange/stackover
Thanks for the comments, and David's reassurance. I have marked the
ticket as ready for review.
John
On 13 January 2014 12:20, David Roe wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:10 AM, John Cremona
> wrote:
>>
>> The following surprised me. I wanted to work on ticket #10108 which
>> had an ol
On 2014-01-13 13:20, David Roe wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:10 AM, John Cremona mailto:john.crem...@gmail.com>> wrote:
The following surprised me. I wanted to work on ticket #10108 which
had an old patch (which no longer applies). Here is what I did:
1. I made sure that I
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:10 AM, John Cremona wrote:
> The following surprised me. I wanted to work on ticket #10108 which
> had an old patch (which no longer applies). Here is what I did:
>
> 1. I made sure that I was on the develop branch which was up-to-date.
> 2. I did
> sage -dev checkout
The following surprised me. I wanted to work on ticket #10108 which
had an old patch (which no longer applies). Here is what I did:
1. I made sure that I was on the develop branch which was up-to-date.
2. I did
sage -dev checkout --ticket=10108
which worked fine, putting me into a new branch ca
On 2014-01-12 20:06, Felix Salfelder wrote:
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 01:09:42PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
Prefix is designed to run as an ordinary user on non-gentoo systems. If
you're on gentoo, you don't need it (unless you don't have root). Plenty
of us have been able to get it working, s
20 matches
Mail list logo
