Okay, python works from the build directory for cygwin32, even though the
spkg install still fails. I couldn't install the mpir spkg on my cygwin64;
here's the log:
$ sage -i mpir
Found package mpir in spkg/standard/mpir-2.6.0.p3.spkg
mpir-2.6.0.p3
On Monday, August 5, 2013 3:12:38 PM UTC-4, Eddie Kim wrote:
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> Yep! It works for me now! Thanks... that was FAST! (What had puzzled me
> before was that I was on a setup where it had been working. Before
> reporting, I checked an a different OS and browser.)
>
> Anyway, it all w
Hi all,
I'm planning to be in San Diego from Nov 8-10 so I could come relatively
easily to the first three days...
Best,
Volker
On Tuesday, August 6, 2013 10:58:13 PM UTC+1, Anne Schilling wrote:
>
> Dear Sage-(combinat) developers!
>
> Dan Bump, Travis Scrimshaw and I are planning to host S
Dear Sage-(combinat) developers!
Dan Bump, Travis Scrimshaw and I are planning to host Sage Developers
Days at UC Davis this fall, most likely November 4-8 (but possibly
September 30 - October 4). The purpose of the meeting is to learn the
new Sage workflow and to discuss how to reorganize/adapt t
El martes, 6 de agosto de 2013 06:47:42 UTC-5, Johan S. R. Nielsen escribió:
>
> Hi Veronica,
> This seems really interesting. How is progress on your project?
>
Thank's for your interest!...
So far I have been working only with binary linear codes.
You can see the progress in this ticket :
Hi Andrew!
> ... about partition being or not a subclass of partition tuple
The situation is pretty similar to skew partitions: a partition can be
interpreted as a degenerate case of skew-partition as well as a
degenerate case of tuple of partitions. The question is whether we
want the tr
I've added it on trac; it is ticket #15012, link [1].
[1] http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15012
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubsc
On 8/6/13 8:40 AM, John Cremona wrote:
Thanks for the explanations. Are there other classes where there are
many different output representations, controlled by parameters to the
str() function istead of by setting defaults for the class?
RealNumber is another one that I patched a long time a
Thanks for the explanations. Are there other classes where there are
many different output representations, controlled by parameters to the
str() function istead of by setting defaults for the class?
John
On 6 August 2013 14:31, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 8/6/13 8:10 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>>
>>
On 8/6/13 8:10 AM, John Cremona wrote:
I really hope there is some clearer documentation than those code
comments, since I am even more confused after reading that than after
seeing the original post.
sage: a = RIF(1.332,1.334)
sage: a.center()
1.333000
sage: a
1.34?
The center is 1.33
I really hope there is some clearer documentation than those code
comments, since I am even more confused after reading that than after
seeing the original post.
sage: a = RIF(1.332,1.334)
sage: a.center()
1.333000
sage: a
1.34?
The center is 1.33 and we know that the value is "really" be
On 8/6/13 7:07 AM, Daniel Krenn wrote:
Hi,
I have the following:
sage: RIF(1.332,1.334), RIF(1.332,1.334).str(style='brackets')
(1.34?, '[1.3320 .. 1.3341]')
This is not wrong, since the questionmark means +/-1 on the previous
digit. But why is the resulting strin
Hi,
I have the following:
sage: RIF(1.332,1.334), RIF(1.332,1.334).str(style='brackets')
(1.34?, '[1.3320 .. 1.3341]')
This is not wrong, since the questionmark means +/-1 on the previous
digit. But why is the resulting string not 1.33?, which would be more
"natural"
On 08/06/2013 07:47 PM, Johan S. R. Nielsen wrote:
Hi Veronica,
This seems really interesting. How is progress on your project?
I work in algebraic coding theory myself, and I have been writing lots
of Sage code for this. Most of it is generally useful, but I have not
had time to add it to Sage
Hi Veronica,
This seems really interesting. How is progress on your project?
I work in algebraic coding theory myself, and I have been writing lots of
Sage code for this. Most of it is generally useful, but I have not had time
to add it to Sage proper, since that would require restructuring a l
15 matches
Mail list logo
