On 6/15/13 1:22 PM, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
On Jun 14, 4:28 pm, William Stein wrote:
Some additional remarks:
- I plan to (eventually) make Ipython also available as an integral
part ofhttp://cloud.sagemath.com;if you open a .sagews you get the
worksheet I've developed, but if you open an
On Jun 15, 2013 5:31 PM, "kcrisman" wrote:
>
>
>
> On Saturday, June 15, 2013 5:26:31 PM UTC-4, William wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Jun 15, 2013 12:22 PM, "Andrey Novoseltsev" wrote:
>> >
>> > On Jun 14, 4:28 pm, William Stein wrote:
>> > > Some additional remarks:
>> > >
>> > > - I plan to (eventually
>
>
> What is the latest status of this ? In particular, is there any
> possibility to enforce the correct behavior by passing some options to
> Maxima ? (I've noticed that maxima_calculus.eval('radexpand:true') does not
> help).
>
>
Yes, I think that is broken. Or at any rate the documentati
On Friday, June 14, 2013 4:20:56 PM UTC-4, jason wrote:
>
> On 6/14/13 2:15 PM, kcrisman wrote:
> > It's gotten to the point
> > that http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14586 has been opened by
> > someone. I assume this ticket is not really valid in that sense, but
> > considering th
On Saturday, June 15, 2013 5:26:31 PM UTC-4, William wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 15, 2013 12:22 PM, "Andrey Novoseltsev"
> >
> wrote:
> >
> > On Jun 14, 4:28 pm, William Stein wrote:
> > > Some additional remarks:
> > >
> > > - I plan to (eventually) make Ipython also available as an integral
> > >
On Jun 15, 2013 12:22 PM, "Andrey Novoseltsev" wrote:
>
> On Jun 14, 4:28 pm, William Stein wrote:
> > Some additional remarks:
> >
> > - I plan to (eventually) make Ipython also available as an integral
> > part ofhttp://cloud.sagemath.com;if you open a .sagews you get the
> > worksheet I've d
On Jun 14, 4:28 pm, William Stein wrote:
> Some additional remarks:
>
> - I plan to (eventually) make Ipython also available as an integral
> part ofhttp://cloud.sagemath.com;if you open a .sagews you get the
> worksheet I've developed, but if you open an ipython notebook file,
> you'll get an i
On 06/15/2013 11:31 AM, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is some behavior of Sage which can be quite disturbing for a new
> user and probably would be considered as a bug:
>
> sage: assume(x<0)
> sage: sqrt(x^2).simplify_full()
> x
>
>
> I know that the problem is due to Maxima function r
Hi,
Here is some behavior of Sage which can be quite disturbing for a new user
and probably would be considered as a bug:
sage: assume(x<0)
sage: sqrt(x^2).simplify_full()
x
It appears that the instruction "assume(x<0)" is not sufficient to enforce
the desired behavior: x is still considered a
On 06/15/2013 04:20 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 6/14/13 2:15 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>> It's gotten to the point
>> that http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14586 has been opened by
>> someone. I assume this ticket is not really valid in that sense, but
>> considering that sagemath.org points to
10 matches
Mail list logo
