On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 3:47 PM, mmarco wrote:
>
>>I haven't tested it, ... Why is it suboptimal?
>
> I used the word "suboptimal" to reffer to the virtualbox based
> solution, not to the cygwin one.
>
> If by "native" you mean "without cygwin"... i am afraid that that we
> would be very far away
On Thursday, 30 May 2013 12:21:25 UTC-7, rjf wrote:
> I repeat. Generating random arguments is not sensible. (Incidentally,
> you will still need to be able to generate the correct answers for these
> functions. This seems to have been overlooked.
> What do you do if your benchmark test shows sl
>I haven't tested it, ... Why is it suboptimal?
I used the word "suboptimal" to reffer to the virtualbox based
solution, not to the cygwin one.
If by "native" you mean "without cygwin"... i am afraid that that we
would be very far away from that. Not only from the sage side (at the
end of the d
Welcome on board, Veronica.
Please keep us up to date to your progress. I am your mentor, but i am
sure the rest of the sage community would like to have you involved.
Just a little clarification: Veronica has been selected under the
umbrella of lmonade, even thoigh her work will be focused on sa
leif wrote:
leif wrote:
John H Palmieri wrote:
Is there a ticket for the sage-sync-build problem?
Not yet. There are a couple of ways to (quickly or temporarily) "fix"
this:
1) Unmerge #14570, which doesn't fix a bug, but only introduces a new
(btw. non-configurable) feature. [A bit odd, e
My understanding is that only a very small subset of linbox is wired into Sage.
In particular, all the iterative methods for the [rank/minpoly/charpoly/det] of
sparse matrices are not accessible yet, but they are Linbox's strong point.
Currently, sparse matrices are converted to dense ones, and
Hi,
as far as I know LELA does not support the same operations as LinBox, it's not
a straight-forward fork but a re-implementation of a subset (that's my
understanding, anyway). it has some advantages, i.e., that some bits nicely
generic, i.e., it should be fairly easy to add new matrix types b
rjf wrote:
On Friday, May 31, 2013 5:25:39 AM UTC-7, kcrisman wrote:
I think the mentor thing is a red herring, though; the number of
projects proposed on Windows probably would roughly match the number
of mentors (at least by proportion), because you wouldn't likely get
int
I would like to have some discussion about the roadmap for matrices in
Sage. It seems that linbox has essentially been forked by LELA
(http://www.singular.uni-kl.de/lela). Since it optionally contains M4RI,
one would think that it is a good fit for Sage, too. Has anybody given any
thoughts to s
On Saturday, June 1, 2013 4:51:39 PM UTC+2, rjf wrote:
> Lisp Programmer $95,000.
>
I raise you the VAX Mainframe: $100,000
http://www.indeed.com/salary?q1=vax+mainframe
Welcome to the cloud!
Could we stop this pointless "discussion" please?
--
You received this message bec
rjf wrote:
On Friday, May 31, 2013 3:21:06 AM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote:
On Friday, May 31, 2013 7:39:02 AM UTC+1, rjf wrote:
Interesting perspective. Where did you get the $10k/year difference?
http://www.indeed.com/salary?q1=Unix+System+Administrator&q2=windows+System+Admin
On Saturday, June 1, 2013 6:16:59 AM UTC-7, mmarco wrote:
>
>
>
> On the other hand, there are people working on a cygwin port. I
> haven't tested it, ... Why is it suboptimal? (one guess: you can't
>
have a one-click windows installer?)
I thought this had been done some time ago -- a cygwn s
On Friday, May 31, 2013 5:25:39 AM UTC-7, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
>I think the mentor thing is a red herring, though; the number of
> projects proposed on Windows probably would roughly match the number of
> mentors (at least by proportion), because you wouldn't likely get
> interested in Sage
On Friday, May 31, 2013 3:21:06 AM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> On Friday, May 31, 2013 7:39:02 AM UTC+1, rjf wrote:
>
>> Interesting perspective. Where did you get the $10k/year difference?
>>
>
>
> http://www.indeed.com/salary?q1=Unix+System+Administrator&q2=windows+System+Administrator
>
>
I know that this is not exactly about the windows port situation, but
still, it is closely related to the sage-on-windows issue:
On the project ideas suggestions that were proposed by sage, there was
one dedicated to writing a GUI to handle the sage installation in
windows. No student decided to p
leif wrote:
John H Palmieri wrote:
Is there a ticket for the sage-sync-build problem?
Not yet. There are a couple of ways to (quickly or temporarily) "fix"
this:
1) Unmerge #14570, which doesn't fix a bug, but only introduces a new
(btw. non-configurable) feature. [A bit odd, especially sin
John H Palmieri wrote:
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:57:07 PM UTC-7, leif wrote:
leif wrote:
> Looks like reinstalling the Sage library spkg would meanwhile also
> trigger the rebuild of *all* extension modules; not sure since when
> though... (seen with Sage 5.10.beta5 at leas
17 matches
Mail list logo
