On Thursday, May 30, 2013 12:29:20 PM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> On Thursday, May 30, 2013 8:05:17 PM UTC+1, rjf wrote:
>
>> I think you badly underestimate the value of a skilled Microsoft Windows
>> expert now and over the
>> next decade or more.
>>
>
> Well there will certainly be demand,
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 12:26:10 PM UTC-7, Harald Schilly wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:05 PM, rjf >
> wrote:
> > As I said previously, I think the lack of
> > a mentor in this area may disqualify GSoC Sage projects in this subject.
>
> I cannot follow you.
>
> Let's consider the fo
On 2013-05-31, leif wrote:
> IMHO both issues (complete rebuild upon cloning and after
> sage-sync-build) should be resolved before the final 5.10 gets out.
+1
It should be a blocker, IMHO.
Cheers, Simon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-deve
leif wrote:
Looks like reinstalling the Sage library spkg would meanwhile also
trigger the rebuild of *all* extension modules; not sure since when
though... (seen with Sage 5.10.beta5 at least)
Yep. This is because #14570, merged into Sage 5.10.beta4, completely
breaks sage-sync-build, which
Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
I confirm this behavior on a fresh install of version 5.9 from the
sources: sage -clone triggers the recompilation of the Cython sources.
In version 5.8, it did not. Don't know the reason for this...
Looks like reinstalling the Sage library spkg would meanwhile also
tr
I think I found a bug in dumps for matrices over GF(2). The problem surfaced
when I tried to save a set of such matrices, and the load failed complaining
that
TypeError('mutable matrices are unhashable',)
Simple example demonstrates the problem:
z = zero_matrix(GF(2), 3)
z.set_immutable()
prin
Hey,
FYI Ive been compiling Sage on a Raspberry Pi for a few days, doc building
not finished yet, but quite everything goes fine except:
* it's damn slow :)
* got a bunch of ICE from GCC (from raspbian, I don't even want to know how
much time compiling Sage's GCC will take) when compiling variou
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 8:05:17 PM UTC+1, rjf wrote:
> I think you badly underestimate the value of a skilled Microsoft Windows
> expert now and over the
> next decade or more.
>
Well there will certainly be demand, somebody has to help the lucy ones
escape their vendor lock-in and provide co
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:05 PM, rjf wrote:
> As I said previously, I think the lack of
> a mentor in this area may disqualify GSoC Sage projects in this subject.
I cannot follow you.
Let's consider the following case: There are about 100 project
proposals submitted. Several ones of them are abo
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:23:27 AM UTC-7, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>
>
> I am going to respond to the comments below, since they come from a
> senior member of the symbolic computation community. I would have
> appreciated them a lot more if they were better informed, at least by
> reading the
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:31:45 AM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> First of all, its the Google summer of code and not the Microsoft summer
> of code ;-)
>
> On Thursday, May 30, 2013 5:07:22 PM UTC+1, rjf wrote:
>
>> While it is hard to count how many people are using free software by
>> look
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:23:32 AM UTC-7, Harald Schilly wrote:
...
> Therefore it is first of all entirely pointless if you propose
> something different, because you should have addressed that to all
> students who submitted projects and not Sage – and second of all you
> do not know a
I am going to respond to the comments below, since they come from a
senior member of the symbolic computation community. I would have
appreciated them a lot more if they were better informed, at least by
reading the original project proposal also posted on this list [1], and
intended as constructi
First of all, its the Google summer of code and not the Microsoft summer of
code ;-)
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 5:07:22 PM UTC+1, rjf wrote:
> While it is hard to count how many people are using free software by
> looking
> at (say) sourceforge statistics --- some people get secondary
> distrib
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:07 PM, rjf wrote:
> Regarding GSoC
The primary focus of the programme is on the students and their
participation, not the actual project. The point I wanted to make is,
that the participating organizations do not advertise jobs – instead
it's the other way around and stu
Regarding GSoC, goals include
1.
Give students more exposure to real-world software development scenarios
(e.g., distributed development, software licensing questions, mailing-list
etiquette)
*
*
from
http://www.google-melange.com/document/show/gsoc_program/google/gsoc2012/
Hi all,
I'm Verónica, an undergraduate math student. I'm glad to share with you the
fact that my project for GSoC 2013 has been selected. The main idea of
these work is to implement new decoding algorithm of linear codes and make
this contribution to Sage.
You can check the full proposal in th
leif wrote:
leif wrote:
Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
I think I encountered a similar issue (on a completely different
kind of system) but cannot dig it out of my mind right now without
further hints.
Yes, we had issues with that partially broken (Debian) GCC already ...
;-)
P.P.S.:
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 5:15:07 PM UTC+2, leif wrote:
>
> leif wrote:
> > Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
> >> On Thursday, May 30, 2013 2:57:32 PM UTC+2, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
> >> On Thursday, May 30, 2013 2:34:48 PM UTC+2, Albert Zeyer wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> ***
leif wrote:
Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 2:57:32 PM UTC+2, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 2:34:48 PM UTC+2, Albert Zeyer wrote:
Found package matplotlib-1.1.0 in
Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 2:57:32 PM UTC+2, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 2:34:48 PM UTC+2, Albert Zeyer wrote:
Found package matplotlib-1.1.0 in
sp
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 2:57:32 PM UTC+2, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> On Thursday, May 30, 2013 2:34:48 PM UTC+2, Albert Zeyer wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Found package matplotlib-1.1.0 in spkg/standard/matplotlib-1.1.0.s
Hey,
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 2:34:48 PM UTC+2, Albert Zeyer wrote:
>
>
>
> Found package matplotlib-1.1.0 in spkg/standard/matplotlib-1.1.0.spkg
> matplotlib-1.1.0
>
> Mo
Found package matplotlib-1.1.0 in spkg/standard/matplotlib-1.1.0.spkg
matplotlib-1.1.0
Moving old directory matplotlib-1.1.0 to
/rwthfs/rz/cluster/home/az668407/sage-5.9/s
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:08 AM, rjf wrote:
> This sounds like a really bad idea …
> Um, I'm not sure what is required here, but maybe just bookkeeping??
> huh?
> … ignore the elephant not in the Operating System Room,
The term "GSoC" stands for the "Google Summer of Code" programme. Do
you even
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:43:17AM +0200, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 05/30/2013 12:08 AM, rjf wrote:
> >This project, and the one below, suggest that people are going to
> >continue to ignore the elephant not
> >in the Operating System Room, namely native Windows XP, Vista, 7, 8 ...
> Windows su
On 05/30/2013 12:08 AM, rjf wrote:
This project, and the one below, suggest that people are going to
continue to ignore the elephant not
in the Operating System Room, namely native Windows XP, Vista, 7, 8 ...
Windows support is very far from being ignored. In fact, there exists a
usable versio
27 matches
Mail list logo
