Hi!
Version 2.1.4 of my optional p_group_cohomology spkg got a positive
review a few days ago. Now, I found that it will not correctly build
with gcc 4.4.5 (which my university's sysadmins have put on the computer
in my office), while it *does* work with Sage's gcc spkg (4.7.2) on the
same machine
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 8:05 PM, leif wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Nils Bruin wrote:
>>>
>>> On May 11, 2:15 pm, Thierry wrote:
Hi,
it was reported
inhttp://ask.sagemath.org/question/2567/kill-the-thread-in-a-long-compu...
tha
William Stein wrote:
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Nils Bruin wrote:
On May 11, 2:15 pm, Thierry wrote:
Hi,
it was reported
inhttp://ask.sagemath.org/question/2567/kill-the-thread-in-a-long-compu...
that cython seems not to handle Python signals correctly. It-it a
feature or should-it be
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Nils Bruin wrote:
> On May 11, 2:15 pm, Thierry wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> it was reported
>> inhttp://ask.sagemath.org/question/2567/kill-the-thread-in-a-long-compu...
>> that cython seems not to handle Python signals correctly. It-it a
>> feature or should-it be repor
I see what you mean, and you might be right in this case. But anyways
i keep my proposal: do you think that having an algorithm=parallel
option for the cases where an optimal tuning heuristic is not
possible? I can think on several situations where, even with a good
tuning, you can find exceptions
On May 11, 2:15 pm, Thierry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it was reported
> inhttp://ask.sagemath.org/question/2567/kill-the-thread-in-a-long-compu...
> that cython seems not to handle Python signals correctly. It-it a
> feature or should-it be reported ?
I think it's a feature. There's a lot of code that re
Thank you all for helping along the way. I got SAGE-5.9 installed finally.
It was just a long wait at the stripping unneeded symbols from binaries and
libraries...
On Saturday, May 11, 2013 11:06:30 AM UTC-7, Pong wrote:
>
> Thanks. I do still have the prebuild and it passes through the build.
>
Hi,
it was reported in
http://ask.sagemath.org/question/2567/kill-the-thread-in-a-long-computation
that cython seems not to handle Python signals correctly. It-it a
feature or should-it be reported ?
Ciao,
Thierry
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sa
leif wrote:
Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
I confirm this behavior on a fresh install of version 5.9 from the
sources: sage -clone triggers the recompilation of the Cython sources.
In version 5.8, it did not. Don't know the reason for this...
FWIW, it did still work in 5.9.beta2.
Probably #13031 [1]
Hey Volker,
I'll make sure there are either no conflicts or set the dependency.
Best,
Travis
On Friday, May 10, 2013 1:54:19 AM UTC-4, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> I'd be grateful if any changes to matrix groups would be on top of the
> libgap-matrix-group patches at #14014
>
>
> On Friday, May 1
Thanks. I do still have the prebuild and it passes through the build.
But now it hangs at
Creating sage-5.9-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz ...
Moving final distribution file to
/home/pong/sage-mathematics/src/sage-5.9/dist
==> Entering fakeroot environment...
==> Starting package()...
==> Tidying install..
Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
I confirm this behavior on a fresh install of version 5.9 from the
sources: sage -clone triggers the recompilation of the Cython sources.
In version 5.8, it did not. Don't know the reason for this...
FWIW, it did still work in 5.9.beta2.
Probably #13031 [1] (merged into
I confirm this behavior on a fresh install of version 5.9 from the sources:
sage -clone triggers the recompilation of the Cython sources. In version
5.8, it did not. Don't know the reason for this...
Eric.
Le vendredi 10 mai 2013 14:53:27 UTC+2, vdelecroix a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> It seems that th
Just change the DOT_SAGE line to point to some dir where you have write
permissions, eg /tmp. Sorry, I forgot to warn you about that, but if you still
have the build dir around makepkg won't need to rebuild everything again
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G
Another wierd thing is that, it produces a pkg/ directory with a strange
premission setting.
d- 2 pong users 4096 May 11 09:05 pkg/
I tried to set it to 755 and it is set to that again when I issue makepkg -i
On Saturday, May 11, 2013 2:16:03 AM UTC-7, arojas wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat
Alright, I see. Thanks. I only didn't know that. I thought PKGBUILDs are
available only to those in AUR, since they ask you explicitly whether you
want to edit them during installation.
We are getting somewhere since I compiles through Singular. However, it
then failed at the conway_polynomial
I've build a sage 5.9 binary thing on a Solaris 10/sparc (SUNW,T5140, so
ultrasparc t2 i guess) by exporting SAGE_FAT_BINARIES=yes and ./sage
--bdist 5.9 (is it the right procedure?) and the result can be found at:
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jpflori/sage-5.9-sun4v-SunOS.tar.gz
If someo
I repeatedly run into problems where Sage claims it's not able to
evaluate a function. Often, this happens due to a
ValueError: negative number cannot be raised to a fractional power
which bubbles up from somewhere deep in the call stack. Here is one of
those cases
summand = summand*( m*( y_i-(
On Saturday, May 11, 2013 10:33:01 AM UTC+2, Pong wrote:
>
> The one in community is 5.8 (not 5.9) and isn't it a binary package?
> I'm looking at the one from AUR which is 5.10 beta.
>
>
Binary packages also have PKGBUILDs. You can download them, modify them as
you need and recompile. Check th
The one in community is 5.8 (not 5.9) and isn't it a binary package?
I'm looking at the one from AUR which is 5.10 beta.
On Saturday, May 11, 2013 1:24:26 AM UTC-7, arojas wrote:
>
>
>
> On Saturday, May 11, 2013 10:17:52 AM UTC+2, Pong wrote:
>>
>> Hi arojas,
>>
>> Which PKGBUILD did you use
On Saturday, May 11, 2013 10:17:52 AM UTC+2, Pong wrote:
>
> Hi arojas,
>
> Which PKGBUILD did you use? Where I search on the arch repo, I only
> see SAGE-5.8 (in community) and SAGE-5.10-devel in AUR.
> Where I downloaded the source (SAGE-5.9) and fellowed your suggestion by
> setting CPP
Hi arojas,
Which PKGBUILD did you use? Where I search on the arch repo, I only see
SAGE-5.8 (in community) and SAGE-5.10-devel in AUR.
Where I downloaded the source (SAGE-5.9) and fellowed your suggestion by
setting CPP to /usr/bin/cpp, I got the exact same error: "bits/c++config.h:
No such
22 matches
Mail list logo
