[sage-devel] Re: Global options

Thanks for the advertisement (and for implementing it in the first place!), here is a link to compiled documentation for those who are interested: http://sagemath.org/doc/reference/structure/sage/structure/global_options.html#sage.structure.global_options.GlobalOptions -- You received this messa

[sage-devel] Global options

Dear Developers, As part of the clean up of the partitions code by Travis (Trac 13605) I implemented a generic options interface in sage which can be used for controlling (global) options for sage objects. See sage.structure.global_options for d

[sage-devel] Re: Error installing package zn_poly-0.9.p10 on Mac OS 10.6.8

This is http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13947 See https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/sage-support/wlbzoUtmTPE for one of several workarounds. On Apr 11, 5:58 pm, Tom Roby wrote: > A couple of hours after I typed "make" I got the following error message: > -- You rece

Re: [sage-devel] Adding smalljac support to Sage

Alright. If it would help, I can ping the list every month or so just in case. Jean-Pierre Flori writes: > On Thursday, April 11, 2013 4:27:57 PM UTC+2, Pavel Panchekha wrote: >> >> I've made some updates on the bug tracker following comments there. Is >> there anything I should do to help peo

[sage-devel] Error installing package zn_poly-0.9.p10 on Mac OS 10.6.8

A couple of hours after I typed "make" I got the following error message: Error installing package zn_poly-0.9.p10 Please email sage-devel (http://group

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC project: make the Sage build system more distribution friendly

Let's drop debian-science from CC. For those interested, the thread on sage-devel is at https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/sage-devel/1HGbf4EZGb0 Am 11.04.2013 22:27, schrieb Felix Salfelder: > in debian, one source package can create multiple binary packages. > this for example m

Re: [sage-devel] DevMap Update

It's probably worth updating mine since it's very out of date http://people.ucalgary.ca/~roed"; trac="roed" /> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Harald Schilly wrote: > Hello (new) Sage Developers! > > There is a Map of all Sage developers on Sage's hompepage: > http://www.sagemath.org/develop

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC project: make the Sage build system more distribution friendly

On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 22:27:48 Felix Salfelder wrote: > Hi there. > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:41:17AM +1200, François Bissey wrote: > > From the point of view of a linux distribution, my opinion is that the > > package management system should be extracted. If it comes from your > > distro the pa

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC project: make the Sage build system more distribution friendly

Hi there. On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:41:17AM +1200, François Bissey wrote: > From the point of view of a linux distribution, my opinion is that the > package > management system should be extracted. If it comes from your distro the > packages and upgrades are handled by the distro mechanism, ex

Re: [sage-devel] Adding smalljac support to Sage

On Thursday, April 11, 2013 4:27:57 PM UTC+2, Pavel Panchekha wrote: > > I've made some updates on the bug tracker following comments there. Is > there anything I should do to help people take another look at the patch > and hopefully push it through acceptance? > > Just wait for someone inter

Re: [sage-devel] Adding smalljac support to Sage

I've made some updates on the bug tracker following comments there. Is there anything I should do to help people take another look at the patch and hopefully push it through acceptance? - Pavel Panchekha On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 6:20 AM, William Stein wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:25 PM,

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC project: make the Sage build system more distribution friendly

On 04/11/2013 01:36 PM, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: On Thursday, April 11, 2013 4:29:33 AM UTC-4, Volker Braun wrote: Also, a top-level configure script is the natural point to select alternatives to 3rd party code. For example, one should be able to ./configure --with-mpir=/usr --wit

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC project: make the Sage build system more distribution friendly

On Thursday, April 11, 2013 4:29:33 AM UTC-4, Volker Braun wrote: > > Also, a top-level configure script is the natural point to select > alternatives to 3rd party code. For example, one should be able to > > ./configure --with-mpir=/usr --with-gap=/usr/local > > to use an external mpir and gap

[sage-devel] DevMap Update

Hello (new) Sage Developers! There is a Map of all Sage developers on Sage's hompepage: http://www.sagemath.org/development-map.html To my knowledge, this hasn't been updated for about half a year and I would like to add you for proper acknowledgement. So, please email me directly the following i

Re: [sage-devel] Re: new optional (or experimental) package CSDP?

+1 I had never heard of Flagmatic before. Looks GREAT :-D Nathann On Thursday, April 11, 2013 6:56:45 AM UTC+2, Snark wrote: > > Le 11/04/2013 06:32, Nils Bruin a �crit : > > On Apr 10, 8:52 pm, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > >> 2) yes to CSDP becoming an experimental package. > > > > Doing that

[sage-devel] Re: Sage part of Google's Summer of Code 2013

Hi, this is a reminder, that students start proposing ideas in the dedicated forum over here: https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!forum/sage-gsoc H On Monday, April 8, 2013 11:03:40 PM UTC+2, Harald Schilly wrote: > > Good News, like last year Sage is once again part of Google's Summer

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Canonical form for permutation groups

On Thursday, April 11, 2013 2:49:10 AM UTC+1, Christian Stump wrote: > > In GAP one would just IdGroup() to get a unique label. > > Is this given for any finite group in GAP, or is this depending on > http://www.gap-system.org/Packages/sgl.html ? This depends on the small groups library. IdGro

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC project: make the Sage build system more distribution friendly

Also, a top-level configure script is the natural point to select alternatives to 3rd party code. For example, one should be able to ./configure --with-mpir=/usr --with-gap=/usr/local to use an external mpir and gap install... On Thursday, April 11, 2013 8:00:30 AM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Wrapping gap.IsConjugate

On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Javier López Peña wrote: Incidentally, I think I misunderstood what you wanted to do. Apparently you are trying to identify conjugate *subgroups* of a group G, whilst what I did works for identifying conjugate *elements* of the group. So feel free to implement your wrapper!

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC project: make the Sage build system more distribution friendly

Hi there. On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 01:04:23AM +0200, Tobias Hansen wrote: > Remember the git transition. spkg's will go away. There will be just one > tarball containing everything in the future. The sources of other > projects will be better separated, so it will be easy to get a Sage > tarball wi

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC project: make the Sage build system more distribution friendly

On 04/11/2013 01:53 AM, R. Andrew Ohana wrote: For those so inclined to browse the current status of the git transition, the repository is at https://github.com/sagemath/sage. Yes, it is completely obvious that this Debian packaging effort should start from the GIT repository, not from the curre