Alright. If it would help, I can ping the list every month or so just in case.
Jean-Pierre Flori writes: > On Thursday, April 11, 2013 4:27:57 PM UTC+2, Pavel Panchekha wrote: >> >> I've made some updates on the bug tracker following comments there. Is >> there anything I should do to help people take another look at the patch >> and hopefully push it through acceptance? >> >> Just wait for someone interested to have time enough to look at it :) > Or find someone still unaware of it and who might be interested... > typically by posting here as you've just done. > I unfortunately have not much time right now and other priorities as far as > sage is concerned. > >> - Pavel Panchekha >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 6:20 AM, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com<javascript:> >> > wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Jean-Pierre Flori >>> <jpf...@gmail.com<javascript:>> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:07:31 AM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote: >>> >> >>> >> I for one would really like smalljac to be in Sage. >>> >> >>> > +1 >>> > >>> > And with PARI 2.6.0 coming, well also have fast point counting for >>> elliptic >>> > curve in small characteristic. >>> > >>> > One issue raised on the Trac ticket: smalljac is 64 bits only, so can we >>> > make it an optional (and not only experimental) spkg? >>> >>> I don't agree. I think we *can* make it standard. It will just >>> require more work and more thought. >>> All smalljac does is provide a *faster* implementation of functions >>> already in sage. >>> On 64-bit it will get built and used -- on 32-bit it won't get built, >>> and instead we'll fall >>> back to using existing functionality. >>> >>> -- William >>> >>> > I'd say most computers are 64 bits anyway now... so I would not mind it >>> > being optional. >>> > But does it really change anything anyway? except for the fact that Drew >>> > Sutherland might be more pleased if the package is optional rather than >>> > experimental? >>> > I don't think we have any specific license requirement either for >>> optional >>> > and experimental spkg, do we? >>> > >>> > -- >>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups >>> > "sage-devel" group. >>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an >>> > email to sage-devel+...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >>> > To post to this group, send email to >>> > sage-...@googlegroups.com<javascript:> >>> . >>> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en. >>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> William Stein >>> Professor of Mathematics >>> University of Washington >>> http://wstein.org >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >>> Google Groups "sage-devel" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-devel/BqedaFjCm38/unsubscribe?hl=en >>> . >>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >>> sage-devel+...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >>> To post to this group, send email to sage-...@googlegroups.com<javascript:> >>> . >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >>> >>> >> -- - Pavel Panchekha -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
