[sage-devel] Re: why is email in sagenb?

I've heard quite often now for several things that if something is needed in both sage and sagenb then we will need two copies. If there are really multiple cases, then maybe it is time to make a small python library called something like "sage-utilities" that contains all the functionality that

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: problems with documentation build

I am using macosx 10.7.5 and firefox 17.0.1 and the page displays properly for me. So the problem is also operating system dependent. Andrew -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegr

[sage-devel] Re: why is email in sagenb?

William Stein writes: > Yes, unless it's needed by the notebook for some reason, in which case > we have to have two copies, since the notebook is supposed to not > depend on sage... Note: Robin Martinjak recently submitted a pull request to sagenb implementing email notifications for sagenb err

Re: [sage-devel] Re: core dump at end of test in 5.5.rc0

On 13 December 2012 18:24, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > > On Thursday, December 13, 2012 6:36:29 PM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote: >> >> When testing 5.5.rc0, newly built on a 64-bit ubuntu 12.04 machine, I >> get a failure in testing >> sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_number_field.py not in any of

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: problems with documentation build

On Thursday, December 13, 2012 9:32:49 AM UTC-8, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > I should mention that this kind of error was reported on > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13143 > but nobody was able to say exactly where the problem lies. > Now we know, it's Firefox-specific. > > I can als

[sage-devel] Re: core dump at end of test in 5.5.rc0

On Thursday, December 13, 2012 6:36:29 PM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote: > > When testing 5.5.rc0, newly built on a 64-bit ubuntu 12.04 machine, I > get a failure in testing > sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_number_field.py not in any of the > tests but at the end when it is quitting: > > 487 p

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: problems with documentation build

On Thursday, December 13, 2012 9:17:24 AM UTC-8, Volker Braun wrote: > > On Thursday, December 13, 2012 5:13:38 PM UTC, John H Palmieri wrote: > >> Or perhaps Volker meant a more recent release of Firefox. What is the >> most recent release available for OS X 10.6.8? > > > Thats what I meant - m

[sage-devel] core dump at end of test in 5.5.rc0

When testing 5.5.rc0, newly built on a 64-bit ubuntu 12.04 machine, I get a failure in testing sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_number_field.py not in any of the tests but at the end when it is quitting: 487 passed and 0 failed. Test passed. Segmentation fault (core dumped) [42.0 s] Is thi

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: problems with documentation build

I should mention that this kind of error was reported on http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13143 but nobody was able to say exactly where the problem lies. Now we know, it's Firefox-specific. I can also add that on OSX 10.5 with Firefox version 3.6.28 the situation is the same. Anyhow, th

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: problems with documentation build

On Thursday, December 13, 2012 5:13:38 PM UTC, John H Palmieri wrote: > Or perhaps Volker meant a more recent release of Firefox. What is the most > recent release available for OS X 10.6.8? Thats what I meant - most recent version is 17.0.1 on all platforms. -- You received this message bec

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: problems with documentation build

On Thursday, December 13, 2012 9:09:15 AM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > > On Thursday, December 13, 2012 9:03:51 AM UTC-8, Volker Braun wrote: >> >> Works for me on Firefox 17.0.1 on Linux x86_64. Can somebody try and see >> if its fixed in more recent recent release? > > > In more detail:

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: problems with documentation build

On Thursday, December 13, 2012 9:03:51 AM UTC-8, Volker Braun wrote: > > Works for me on Firefox 17.0.1 on Linux x86_64. Can somebody try and see > if its fixed in more recent recent release? In more detail: go to and follow the link for "Current Version: Ma

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: problems with documentation build

Works for me on Firefox 17.0.1 on Linux x86_64. Can somebody try and see if its fixed in more recent recent release? On Thursday, December 13, 2012 4:52:09 PM UTC, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > OK, I can confirm this. It is Firefox-specific, as on OSX 10.6.8 I > only see this on Firefox (5.0.1),

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: problems with documentation build

On 14 December 2012 00:33, Anne Schilling wrote: > On 12/13/12 8:17 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> Hi Anne, >> >> On 14 December 2012 00:01, Anne Schilling wrote: >>> On 12/13/12 2:37 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: ["Followup-To:" header set to gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.devel.] On 2012-12-12

Re: Re: [sage-devel] why is email in sagenb?

Yes, unless it's needed by the notebook for some reason, in which case we have to have two copies, since the notebook is supposed to not depend on sage... On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Martin Albrecht wrote: > Okay, looks like I can move it then (?) > > On Thursday 13 Dec 2012, William Stein

Re: Re: [sage-devel] why is email in sagenb?

Okay, looks like I can move it then (?) On Thursday 13 Dec 2012, William Stein wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Martin Albrecht > > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > why is the email() function implemented in sagenb instead of sage. It > > would seem it should be part of Sage but it's in > > >

Re: [sage-devel] why is email in sagenb?

On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Martin Albrecht wrote: > Hi, > > why is the email() function implemented in sagenb instead of sage. It would > seem it should be part of Sage but it's in > >sagenb.sagenb.notebook.sage_email > > btw. I am asking for > >http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ti

[sage-devel] why is email in sagenb?

Hi, why is the email() function implemented in sagenb instead of sage. It would seem it should be part of Sage but it's in sagenb.sagenb.notebook.sage_email btw. I am asking for http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13829 Cheers, Martin -- name: Martin Albrecht _pgp: http://pgp.

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: problems with documentation build

Hi Anne, On 14 December 2012 00:01, Anne Schilling wrote: > On 12/13/12 2:37 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> ["Followup-To:" header set to gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.devel.] >> On 2012-12-12, Anne Schilling wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> Both Travis and I are having trouble viewing the documentation after

[sage-devel] Re: Talk about the implementation of braid groups.

I forgot to say that the worksheet is published in: https://abel.mat.ucm.es:8080/home/pub/0/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send em

[sage-devel] Talk about the implementation of braid groups.

I am giving a talk about the implementation of braid groups in sage next week. It is aimed mostly at braid specialists that don't necessarily know much about sage, so i have included a brief introduction to it. You can see the worksheet i have prepared in https://abel.mat.ucm.es:8080 The code for

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 5.4 on ARM

jaebond, did you try the image i linked? did it work for you? On 9 dic, 10:56, mmarco wrote: > I have made a zip archive with both the image and the scripts that i > use. you can download it from: > > http://riemann.unizar.es/algebra/Archive1.zip > > It also includes a readme.txt file > > On 8 di