Re: [sage-devel] Groups and ParentWithGens vs. Parent

2012-10-27 Thread David Joyner
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 4:58 PM, David Roe wrote: > I haven't tried, but I fully support moving it to the new-style Parent. > David +1 > > > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Volker Braun wrote: >> >> Right now sage.groups.group.Group class (base for all groups) derives from >> the deprecated Pa

Re: [sage-devel] Groups and ParentWithGens vs. Parent

2012-10-27 Thread David Roe
I haven't tried, but I fully support moving it to the new-style Parent. David On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Volker Braun wrote: > Right now sage.groups.group.Group class (base for all groups) derives from > the deprecated ParentWithGens. Has anybody tried to change it to derive the > new-styl

[sage-devel] Groups and ParentWithGens vs. Parent

2012-10-27 Thread Volker Braun
Right now sage.groups.group.Group class (base for all groups) derives from the deprecated ParentWithGens. Has anybody tried to change it to derive the new-style Parent? Would it be a worth-while endeavor? I'm partially asking to find out how to proceed with the finitely presented group code at

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ARM box?

2012-10-27 Thread R. Andrew Ohana
Sorry, I've been very busy with classes, but I'll see if I can't find a bit of time this week to finish setting it up. That said, I think it would be best to make the device solely a buildbot, as it only has 1GB of RAM, and instead use an emulator for general Sage development (where we have the fre

[sage-devel] Mutabilitiy of simplicial complexes

2012-10-27 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
Hey everyone, On #12587, I've made SimplicialComplex behave like Graph in that add/remove_face() modifies the object itself, but I've added an option to make the object immutable, thus hashable. John Palmieri suggested to making it a purely immutable object since add/remove_face() only is cal

[sage-devel] Re: Sage Amazon AMI ?

2012-10-27 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On 2012-10-27, William Stein wrote: > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> On 2012-10-27, William Stein wrote: >>> On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Dima Pasechnik >>> wrote: I wonder if anyone tried building an Amazon EC2 AMI with Sage loaded. EC2 service has a fr

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage Amazon AMI ?

2012-10-27 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On 2012-10-27, William Stein wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Dima Pasechnik >> wrote: >>> I wonder if anyone tried building an Amazon EC2 AMI with Sage loaded. >>> EC2 service has a free tier, which is a bit smallish configurati

[sage-devel] Re: Sage Amazon AMI ?

2012-10-27 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On 2012-10-27, William Stein wrote: > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Dima Pasechnik > wrote: >> I wonder if anyone tried building an Amazon EC2 AMI with Sage loaded. >> EC2 service has a free tier, which is a bit smallish configuration, >> but perhaps one can still fit Sage in? > > I compiled S

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ARM box?

2012-10-27 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 6:43 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On 2012-09-17, William Stein wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >>> William, you once or twice mentioned that you were going to order an ARM >>> box for Sage development. Did anything happen already? >>> >> >>

Re: [sage-devel] Sage Amazon AMI ?

2012-10-27 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > I wonder if anyone tried building an Amazon EC2 AMI with Sage loaded. > EC2 service has a free tier, which is a bit smallish configuration, but > perhaps > one can still fit Sage in? I compiled Sage from source last year on their free EC2

[sage-devel] Re: IS IT NORMAL FOR THE det TO OVERFLOW ON A 20X20 MATRIX?

2012-10-27 Thread Jason Grout
On 10/27/12 8:33 AM, P Purkayastha wrote: rbeezer had proposed a better solution here: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12514#comment:7 Unfortunately, I completely forgot about that ticket and haven't gotten around to making that change. +1 to Rob's suggestion (have RR/CC matrices co

[sage-devel] Re: ARM box?

2012-10-27 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On 2012-09-17, William Stein wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> William, you once or twice mentioned that you were going to order an ARM >> box for Sage development. Did anything happen already? >> > > I bought it. It arrived. I plugged it into the monitor in my

[sage-devel] Re: IS IT NORMAL FOR THE det TO OVERFLOW ON A 20X20 MATRIX?

2012-10-27 Thread P Purkayastha
On 10/27/2012 09:19 PM, Jason Grout wrote: On 10/27/12 1:04 AM, P Purkayastha wrote: Until that gets in, I put in a patch at #13657 to the tutorial to at least mention RDF/CDF as the ones to use for eigenvalue and eigenvector computations. And possible other numerical computations. If you have

[sage-devel] Sage Amazon AMI ?

2012-10-27 Thread Dima Pasechnik
I wonder if anyone tried building an Amazon EC2 AMI with Sage loaded. EC2 service has a free tier, which is a bit smallish configuration, but perhaps one can still fit Sage in? Dima -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To post to this

[sage-devel] Re: IS IT NORMAL FOR THE det TO OVERFLOW ON A 20X20 MATRIX?

2012-10-27 Thread Jason Grout
On 10/27/12 1:04 AM, P Purkayastha wrote: Until that gets in, I put in a patch at #13657 to the tutorial to at least mention RDF/CDF as the ones to use for eigenvalue and eigenvector computations. And possible other numerical computations. If you have anything more to add, then please do so. h