On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:45 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a question and suggestion. Are our tickets in "needs review" status
>> being timely reviewed? Judging from my own (limited) experiences, it seems
>> not. I again find
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a question and suggestion. Are our tickets in "needs review" status
> being timely reviewed? Judging from my own (limited) experiences, it seems
> not. I again find myself soliciting a reviewer for my simple ticket #11593.
>
> I
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a question and suggestion. Are our tickets in "needs review" status
> being timely reviewed? Judging from my own (limited) experiences, it seems
> not. I again find myself soliciting a reviewer for my simple ticket #11593.
>
> I
Hi,
This is a question and suggestion. Are our tickets in "needs review" status
being timely reviewed? Judging from my own (limited) experiences, it seems
not. I again find myself soliciting a reviewer for my simple ticket #11593.
If this is the case, how about adopting a policy similar to the
Hi,
I propose a tiny patch ([1]) to solve several problems that appear on
that list about comparisons of Sage integer with numpy.integer (namely
[2] and [3]). The main problem is for me
{{{
sage: import numpy
sage: numpy.int32(1) == 1
True
sage: 1 == numpy.int32(1)
False
}}}
The issue was to modif
Hi!
At #13370, I have a debugging problem that seems difficult to me.
There is a segfault when testing
sage/rings/polynomial/infinite_polynomial_element.py, but the segfault
seems only to occur when I do parallel tests.
To be precise:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/infinite_polynomial
Rajeev Singh writes:
> I have compiled sage-5.2 on ubuntu 12.04. The following test fails -
>
> sage -t --long -force_lib
> "devel/sage/sage/modular/modform/find_generators.py"
>
> There was a segmentation fault.
Can you rerun that particular file and attach or pastebin the output, so
we c
Hi,
I have compiled sage-5.2 on ubuntu 12.04. The following test fails -
sage -t --long -force_lib
"devel/sage/sage/modular/modform/find_generators.py"
There was a segmentation fault.
Rajeev
--
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe fro
Le 20/08/2012 19:46, spyros a écrit :
I would like to develop variants of the LLL algorithm in SAGE. Can someone
please inform me which variants already exist?
I was hoping someone more knowledgeable would answer, but as it doesn't
happen : sage contains libfplll, pari and flint -- I think tho
Keshav Kini writes:
> If this is still your view, it seems to me that we can probably even get
> rid of the OpenSSL headers dependency which has been causing users so
> much trouble since 5.2 was released. We can just stop packaging
> pyOpenSSL with the sagenb SPKG, and instead require users who w
10 matches
Mail list logo
