[sage-devel] Re: prime_pi plotting preposterousness

2012-07-17 Thread Jason Grout
On 7/18/12 12:50 AM, Dan Drake wrote: On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 at 10:27PM -0700, R. Andrew Ohana wrote: This is kind of fixed by #11475 (in that prime_pi becomes part of the symbolic ring). Cool. The bigger issue is that the symbolic ring does sampling for plotting, which is horribly inefficient

Re: [sage-devel] prime_pi plotting preposterousness

2012-07-17 Thread Dan Drake
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 at 10:27PM -0700, R. Andrew Ohana wrote: > This is kind of fixed by #11475 (in that prime_pi becomes part of the > symbolic ring). Cool. > The bigger issue is that the symbolic ring does sampling for plotting, > which is horribly inefficient for prime_pi -- something that is s

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ubuntu 12.04 binaries

2012-07-17 Thread Jan Groenewald
Hi On 17 July 2012 20:48, Volker Braun wrote: > I haven't compiled Sage on a non-gui Ubuntu 12.04 install so I can't claim > anything with absolute certainty. But many (perhaps all) fonts do depend on > libfontconfig1. For example: fonts-opensymbol -> fontconfig -> > libfontconfig1. Though appar

Re: [sage-devel] prime_pi plotting preposterousness

2012-07-17 Thread R. Andrew Ohana
This is kind of fixed by #11475 (in that prime_pi becomes part of the symbolic ring). The bigger issue is that the symbolic ring does sampling for plotting, which is horribly inefficient for prime_pi -- something that is solved with the custom plotting method for prime_pi. On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at

[sage-devel] prime_pi plotting preposterousness

2012-07-17 Thread Dan Drake
Plotting the prime_pi function is really strange. It seems like something needs a little polish: sage: plot(prime_pi, (5,100)) fails with "TypeError: an integer is required". However, sage: prime_pi(15.5) 6 works fine. So the plot command seems to be failing for no good reason. But

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ubuntu 12.04 binaries

2012-07-17 Thread Volker Braun
I haven't compiled Sage on a non-gui Ubuntu 12.04 install so I can't claim anything with absolute certainty. But many (perhaps all) fonts do depend on libfontconfig1. For example: fonts-opensymbol -> fontconfig -> libfontconfig1. Though apparently mathplotlib ships with a bunch of various fonts

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ubuntu 12.04 binaries

2012-07-17 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > On Tuesday, July 17, 2012 1:17:23 AM UTC-4, William wrote: >> >> I can't guarantee 5.1 would build, but >> certainly many previous versions of Sage built on non-desktop minimal >> installs of Ubuntu. > > > It may build, but without fonts there

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ubuntu 12.04 binaries

2012-07-17 Thread Volker Braun
On Tuesday, July 17, 2012 1:17:23 AM UTC-4, William wrote: > > I can't guarantee 5.1 would build, but > certainly many previous versions of Sage built on non-desktop minimal > installs of Ubuntu. > It may build, but without fonts there won't be plot labels etc. The Sage library doctests may no

[sage-devel] Re: Vote: should CHomP be a standard spkg?

2012-07-17 Thread Volker Braun
It seems like the copyright headers are not uniform, especially when you look a older files. For example /src/capd-chom/complex.cpp technically isn't even GPL (it says "Copyright . All rights reserved.") On Monday, July 16, 2012 5:49:33 PM UTC-4, John H Palmieri wrote: > > // This file is part

[sage-devel] Re: Vote: should CHomP be a standard spkg?

2012-07-17 Thread kcrisman
> > > And Sage should definitely have hoodies. Should we have a Sage Days > focused on Sage clothing and accessories? > > I think this could be handled in a one-day workshop at the end of another Sage Days ;-) -- -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsub

[sage-devel] Re: Source code find_fit and complex_cubic_spline

2012-07-17 Thread kcrisman
Dear all, > > it seems that there is no routine to interpolate points > \in\mathbb{C}\times\mathbb{C} by functions f\colon\mathbb{ C}·\to\mathbb{C} > other than cubic splines until now, but I assume that it is not too > difficult to extend the existing routines. Thus I wonder whether it is >

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath-monolithic PPA on launchpad

2012-07-17 Thread Jan Groenewald
Hi On 17 July 2012 12:40, Julien Puydt wrote: > Le 15/07/2012 09:29, Jan Groenewald a écrit : > >> Hi >> >> On 15 July 2012 09:26, Julien Puydt > > wrote: >> >> Le 15/07/2012 08:53, Jan Groenewald a écrit : >> >> E: Unmet dependencies. Try 'apt-get

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath-monolithic PPA on launchpad

2012-07-17 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 15/07/2012 09:29, Jan Groenewald a écrit : Hi On 15 July 2012 09:26, Julien Puydt mailto:julien.pu...@laposte.net>> wrote: Le 15/07/2012 08:53, Jan Groenewald a écrit : E: Unmet dependencies. Try 'apt-get -f install' with no packages (or specify a solution). Uh...

Re: [sage-devel] ubuntu 12.04 binaries

2012-07-17 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 17/07/2012 08:02, Jan Groenewald a écrit : I provided that buildbot from a machine with a lot installed already. (I hope to some months from now provide a more minimal system) With pbuilder, the build only has available debian's base installation (very small) and what is listed as build-de

[sage-devel] Fwd: Source code find_fit and complex_cubic_spline

2012-07-17 Thread Urs Hackstein
-- Forwarded message -- From: Urs Hackstein Date: 2012/7/17 Subject: Source code find_fit and complex_cubic_spline To: sage-supp...@googlegroups.com Dear all, it seems that there is no routine to interpolate points \in\mathbb{C}\times\mathbb{C} by functions f\colon\mathbb{ C}·\t