On 7/18/12 12:50 AM, Dan Drake wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 at 10:27PM -0700, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
This is kind of fixed by #11475 (in that prime_pi becomes part of the
symbolic ring).
Cool.
The bigger issue is that the symbolic ring does sampling for plotting,
which is horribly inefficient for prime_pi -- something that is solved
with the custom plotting method for prime_pi.
Sampling is definitely a poor idea here. How does one access the custom
plotting method? It seems like plot(prime_pi, 5, 100) does so -- but why
then does plot(prime_pi, (5,100)) *not* use it?
Is there a way to get the plot command to be smart enough to
automatically use the custom method?
IIRC, if A.plot exists, then plot(A, ...) will call A.plot(...). I
think plot(prime_pi, ...) *is* using the custom plotting method always.
The problem is that the prime_pi.plot method is very limited, and
doesn't recognize prime_pi.plot((5,100)).
Jason
--
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
