Ok sorry, probably I was confusing with the revised BSD and the fact that
the license happily allows proprietary software to use and abuse open
source components. But yes, you are right about the single files.
--
Andrea Lazzarotto
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroup
On 6/29/12 4:30 PM, Andrea Lazzarotto wrote:
Il giorno 29/giu/2012 23:20, "Jason Grout" mailto:jason-s...@creativetrax.com>> ha scritto:
> The BSD files themselves would still be BSD, even if the distribution
was GPL, right? You can't just delete the BSD header and change it to
GPL, can you?
Y
Il giorno 29/giu/2012 23:20, "Jason Grout" ha
scritto:
> The BSD files themselves would still be BSD, even if the distribution was
GPL, right? You can't just delete the BSD header and change it to GPL, can
you?
You can change a single character and release your modified version as GPL.
:-)
--
A
On 6/29/12 4:13 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2012-06-29 20:54, Fernando Perez wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Jan Groenewald wrote:
Would this symmetric flow not also be possible if ipython relicensed to GPL?
Honest question.
Certainly, but that's not in the cards. All the 'scipy e
On 6/29/12 1:54 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
It would be likely impossible to
get them to agree to a GPL relicensing.
But you wouldn't have to, right? You could just add one file that was
GPL, and start distributing that, and IPython would switch to GPL
(though the files already there would be
On 2012-06-29 20:54, Fernando Perez wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Jan Groenewald wrote:
>> Would this symmetric flow not also be possible if ipython relicensed to GPL?
>> Honest question.
>
> Certainly, but that's not in the cards. All the 'scipy ecosytem'
> (python, numpy, scipy, m
>
> Besides at this
>
point even if I wanted (which I don't) to change it I couldn't, as
> there are by now way too many ipython contributors who made their
> contributions to the project as BSD. It would be likely impossible to
> get them to agree to a GPL relicensing.
>
Can't it be an issue for
Ivan Andrus writes:
> Actually Cython itself comes with cython-mode.el [1], so perhaps we
> ought to use that.
IMO this is clearly the way to go :)
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe fro
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Jan Groenewald wrote:
> Would this symmetric flow not also be possible if ipython relicensed to GPL?
> Honest question.
Certainly, but that's not in the cards. All the 'scipy ecosytem'
(python, numpy, scipy, matplotlib, ipython, pandas, statsmodels,
scikit-learn
Hi
On 29 June 2012 20:39, Fernando Perez wrote:
> Minor note from the peanut gallery:
>
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:46 AM, William Stein wrote:
> > We should just relicense the sage notebook as BSD to completely
> > eliminate this problem
>
> speaking from the IPython side, this would be great
Minor note from the peanut gallery:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:46 AM, William Stein wrote:
> We should just relicense the sage notebook as BSD to completely
> eliminate this problem
speaking from the IPython side, this would be great for us. We're
starting to have real collaboration between ipy
It would be great if somebody could review this. It doesn't involve any
math, and the design decisions were already discussed on the mailinglist.
And it would make my life easier since the patch is going to break whenever
a deprecation is added/removed from the Sage library.
http://trac.sagemat
On 2012-06-29 13:51, kcrisman wrote:
> Is it dependent on the number of betas? That seems to have been the
> determining factor in the last year or so.
Yes, probably this is the most important factor.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
On Friday, June 29, 2012 2:49:44 AM UTC-4, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2012-06-28 23:20, kcrisman wrote:
> > Okay, but to play devil's advocate - if the explicit goal is merging
> > #11080 and releasing something without problems otherwise, could that
> > take shorter?
> I really doubt it wo
I'm updating sage-mode to work with the latest python.el, so I'm going through
it systematically for the time. I've noticed something odd, namely that there
exist both pyrex-mode and cython-mode. cython-mode is very minimal, and a
strict subset of pyrex-mode. However, both register themselves
Hi!
Apparently we use three essentially different ways of comparing
matrices:
sage: def test(K):
: M1 = Matrix(K,[[1,0,0]])
: M2 = Matrix(K,[[0,1,0]])
: M3 = Matrix(K,[[0,1,1]])
: M4 = Matrix(K,[[0,0,1]])
: L = [M1,M2,M3,M4]
: L.sort()
I created an upgraded mercurial spkg, mainly because the current one
doesn't work properly on Solaris SPARC and that's annoying for Sage
development.
I added a small sanity check in spkg-install that "hg log" works on the
mercurial spkg repository.
So please review:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_
17 matches
Mail list logo
