On 7 Apr., 23:55, John Cremona wrote:
> I have a new autotools-based release of eclib, which will be turned
> into a new spkg after the weekend, and with luck that will settle some
> build issues.
Nice. No more `make` warnings due to Makefiles including each other,
no more superfluous libraries
I think it's fine to change it, since we actively discourage users from
using is_* functions outside of library code.
David
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 17:42, Niles Johnson wrote:
>
> On Monday, April 9, 2012 5:02:45 PM UTC-4, Niles Johnson wrote:
>>
>> But I haven't found a Trac ticket for it -- cou
On Monday, April 9, 2012 5:02:45 PM UTC-4, Niles Johnson wrote:
>
> But I haven't found a Trac ticket for it -- could someone point it out to
> me if it doesn't exist?
>
>
Er, I mean, could someone point out a ticket if it *does* exist?
Also, I've since learned that is_Graphics is used exactly o
On Monday, April 9, 2012 1:51:43 PM UTC-7, Nicolas M. Thiéry wrote:
>
>
> While we are speaking about documentation for ``._*`` methods it, a
> related question. I consider Python's (``.__*__``) and Sage's
> (``._*_``) special methods as public, and would be very much in favor
> of including them
On Monday, April 9, 2012 2:14:02 PM UTC-7, David Roe wrote:
>
> I agree that it would be nice if __*__ and _*_ showed up in the
> documentation.
> David
>
Then run "sage --docbuild -u reference html". According to "sage
--docbuild help":
-u, --underscoreinclude variables prefixed wit
I agree that it would be nice if __*__ and _*_ showed up in the
documentation.
David
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 14:00, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 9, 2:51 pm, "Nicolas M. Thiery"
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 10:06:32AM -0700, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
> > > I think "_included_pri
Hello everyone,
I'm thinking about making a small update to the Animation class so that it
can handle animating 3D graphics too. (Details below.) Since this is a
frequently-requested feature, I wouldn't be surprised if people have
already done some work on it, or at least have strong feelings
On Apr 9, 2:51 pm, "Nicolas M. Thiery"
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 10:06:32AM -0700, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
> > I think "_included_private_doc_" attribute would be great.
>
> Of course, as Florent and David I'd much prefer the approach of
> including a private method if and only if it's
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 10:06:32AM -0700, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
> I think "_included_private_doc_" attribute would be great.
Of course, as Florent and David I'd much prefer the approach of
including a private method if and only if it's referred to somewhere,
but unless we have a volunteer to i
Le lundi 09 avril, mmarco a écrit:
> So if you have an armel build, i can give it a try.
I'll dig the documentation to find out how to make one of what I have
(I think it's a 5.0.beta4 or 5.0.beta5), and post a link.
Snark on #sagemath
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googl
Hi Florent,
I think "_included_private_doc_" attribute would be great. Does it
have to be a list of strings, or can it be a list of class members,
i.e. without quotes?
Thank you!
Andrey
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send a
On Monday, April 9, 2012 7:07:14 PM UTC+8, Volker Braun wrote:
>
>
> On an unrelated note, zeromq was just forked by two of the original
> developers, see http://www.crossroads.io. Though I think for Sage
> purposes it doesn't matter which library provides the zeromq API.
>
There is a good artic
For those who can't install MPIR, please try the new spkg from #11616:
./sage -f
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/spkg/mpir-2.4.0.p2.spkg
and send me spkg/logs/mpir-2.4.0.p2.log
(regardless of whether the install succeeded)
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@goo
On 2012-04-06 17:01, William Stein wrote:
> For me it fails much earlier:
>
> checking for x86_64-apple-darwin11.3.0-gcc...
> /Users/wstein/sage/install/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/spkg/build/gcc-4.6.3/gcc-build/./gcc/xgcc
> -B/Users/wstein/sage/install/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/spkg/build/gcc-4.6.3/gcc-build/.
I can install a newer ubuntu system in a chroot. I think that the fact
of running under a chroot environment shouldn't prevent the sage build
from running. All the libraries are in the chroot jail.
So if you have an armel build, i can give it a try.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sa
Are we going to make zeromq+pyzmq a standard spkg anytime soon, or is
anybody opposed to doing so? I think a communication framework would be
potentially of more use than just for the notebook server, but I haven't
seen any efforts towards including zeromq. Also, the new IPython can make
use of
Dear Sage devs,
Could I ask if any of you would have time to look at a tiny patch for a bug
in Sage's polynomial code?
This came up as a side-effect of work on Eisenstein series in the modular
forms code at ticket #12724. I wrote a patch which did have a positive
review, but it subsequently tu
Nils Bruin writes:
>> ...
>> si = numpy.sign(xm-xf) + ((xm-xf)==0)
>> ...
>> si = numpy.sign(rat) + (rat == 0)
>> x = xf + si*max([abs(rat), tol1])
>> ...
>
> Ah shoot. That code is quite understandable. What they need is:
>
>
> si = numpy.sign(xm-x
18 matches
Mail list logo
