Re: [sage-devel] Upgrading to latest development release

On Saturday, March 24, 2012 1:45:01 PM UTC+8, P Purkayastha wrote: > > > > On Saturday, March 24, 2012 5:04:32 AM UTC+8, Starx wrote: >> >> So I'm trying to upgrade my beta7 to beta9. It didn't work and I'm >> not sure how to interpret what happened: >> >> ~/sage-dev/devel/sage-main Starx$ ../..

Re: [sage-devel] Upgrading to latest development release

On Saturday, March 24, 2012 5:04:32 AM UTC+8, Starx wrote: > > So I'm trying to upgrade my beta7 to beta9. It didn't work and I'm > not sure how to interpret what happened: > > ~/sage-dev/devel/sage-main Starx$ ../../sage -upgrade > > http://boxen.math.washington.​edu/home/release/sage-5.0.​beta

[sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

On 2012-03-23, Julien Puydt wrote: > Le vendredi 23 mars, Julien Puydt a écrit: >> from the top of my head, you'll mostly need a newer flint (1.5.2) > > Here is the trac ticket about the flint package: > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10328 Please review it! It needs to be reviewed for

Re: [sage-devel] categories and element classes

Elements are supposed to inherit from their category's element_class, but this requirement is waived for elements that are implemented in Cython. See the following snippet from sage.structure.element.Element._test_category (line 495 of element.pyx): # Tests that self inherits methods from

[sage-devel] categories and element classes

Hello sage-devel, (I sent this from my email a couple of hours ago but it hasn't appeared on the list yet. I am trying again from within Google Groups. Apologies if it ends up being a duplicate post.) Schemes and their points are not yet properly embedded in the category framework. One of th

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Trac reports

> > Is there a report that lists "tickets needing work that I *attached a > patch to*"? > These are now reports 84 and 85 (sorted by time and component respectively). David -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sa

[sage-devel] Re: Include ../../../../whatever -- uh?

On Friday, March 23, 2012 4:39:02 PM UTC-7, leif wrote: > > On 24 Mrz., 00:25, leif wrote: > > On 23 Mrz., 23:18, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > > > > On 2012-03-23 22:58, leif wrote:> P.S.: What makes *me* wonder since > years btw. is the bizarre "python > > > > `which cython` ..." :-) > > >

[sage-devel] Re: Include ../../../../whatever -- uh?

On 24 Mrz., 00:25, leif wrote: > On 23 Mrz., 23:18, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > > On 2012-03-23 22:58, leif wrote:> P.S.: What makes *me* wonder since years > > btw. is the bizarre "python > > > `which cython` ..." :-) > > > Simply "cython" should work I guess... > > Yes, but this is too obvious.

[sage-devel] Re: Include ../../../../whatever -- uh?

On 23 Mrz., 23:18, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2012-03-23 22:58, leif wrote:> P.S.: What makes *me* wonder since years > btw. is the bizarre "python > > `which cython` ..." :-) > > Simply "cython" should work I guess... Yes, but this is too obvious. I must be missing something. Although I somet

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Include ../../../../whatever -- uh?

On 2012-03-23 22:58, leif wrote: > P.S.: What makes *me* wonder since years btw. is the bizarre "python > `which cython` ..." :-) Simply "cython" should work I guess... -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-de

[sage-devel] Re: Include ../../../../whatever -- uh?

P.S.: What makes *me* wonder since years btw. is the bizarre "python `which cython` ..." :-) -leif -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group

[sage-devel] Re: Include ../../../../whatever -- uh?

On 23 Mrz., 22:30, John H Palmieri wrote: > On Friday, March 23, 2012 2:07:21 PM UTC-7, Snark wrote: > > > Le jeudi 22 mars, Julien Puydt a écrit: > > > Le jeudi 22 mars, William Stein a écrit: > > > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Julien Puydt wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > yesterday I notic

Re: [sage-devel] Include ../../../../whatever -- uh?

Le vendredi 23 mars, John H Palmieri a écrit: > I'm far from being a cython expert, but take a look at the log file > for the Sage library (SAGE_ROOT/spkg/logs/sage-...): there will be a > line (like yours): > > python `which cython` --cplus --old-style-globals > --disable-function-redefinition -

Re: [sage-devel] Include ../../../../whatever -- uh?

On Friday, March 23, 2012 2:07:21 PM UTC-7, Snark wrote: > > Le jeudi 22 mars, Julien Puydt a écrit: > > Le jeudi 22 mars, William Stein a écrit: > > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Julien Puydt wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > yesterday I noticed that there are many places in sage's sources

[sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

> > Does that run android or a complete distribution? > It does run android, but i have read that it is possible to install ubuntu in a chroot environment. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr

[sage-devel] Re: Upgrading to latest development release

On 23 Mrz., 22:25, leif wrote: > Upgrading *from* devel releases to later releases (stable or devel, > doesn't matter) is currently "consciously" broken. > > Cf. some recent thread here on basing releases on the previous *devel* > release. See http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thr

[sage-devel] Re: Upgrading to latest development release

On 23 Mrz., 22:04, Starx wrote: > So I'm trying to upgrade my beta7 to beta9.  It didn't work and I'm > not sure how to interpret what happened: > > ~/sage-dev/devel/sage-main Starx$ ../../sage > -upgradehttp://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-5.0.beta9/sage-5.0... > [1] 1793 > ~/sage-

Re: [sage-devel] Upgrading to latest development release

On Friday, March 23, 2012 2:04:32 PM UTC-7, Starx wrote: > > So I'm trying to upgrade my beta7 to beta9. Upgrading from one beta release to another is not supported, so this is not likely to work. (If you are curious about why, then search through sage-devel for other threads on upgrading.)

Re: [sage-devel] Include ../../../../whatever -- uh?

Le jeudi 22 mars, Julien Puydt a écrit: > Le jeudi 22 mars, William Stein a écrit: > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Julien Puydt > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > yesterday I noticed that there are many places in sage's sources > > > (I only checked in the sage spkg) where inclusions are made w

[sage-devel] Upgrading to latest development release

So I'm trying to upgrade my beta7 to beta9. It didn't work and I'm not sure how to interpret what happened: ~/sage-dev/devel/sage-main Starx$ ../../sage -upgrade http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-5.0.beta9/sage-5.0.beta9/&usg=AFQjCNFNueKjqvL-1BX7yv9vvQV1fbl3HQ [1] 1793 ~/sage-dev

Re: [sage-devel] ARM port (again)

Le vendredi 23 mars, Julien Puydt a écrit: > from the top of my head, you'll mostly need a newer flint (1.5.2) Here is the trac ticket about the flint package: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10328 Snark on #sagemath -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.c

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

Le vendredi 23 mars, Dima Pasechnik a écrit: > On 2012-03-23, mmarco wrote: > > I tried to answer to the post of the arm port, but i am not sure > > why i can't. > > > > I am considering buying an asus eeepad transformer prime. So i would > > like to compile sage on it. What are the changes that n

[sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

On 2012-03-23, mmarco wrote: > I tried to answer to the post of the arm port, but i am not sure why i > can't. > > I am considering buying an asus eeepad transformer prime. So i would > like to compile sage on it. What are the changes that need to be done > to the source code to do it?. Is there

Re: [sage-devel] ARM port (again)

Le vendredi 23 mars, mmarco a écrit: > I am considering buying an asus eeepad transformer prime. So i would > like to compile sage on it. What are the changes that need to be done > to the source code to do it?. Is there somewhere a tarball with the > code already adapted? Does that run android

[sage-devel] Re: multithreded Atlas?

On 23 Mrz., 19:08, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > Currently Sage ships only single-threaded Atlas libraries. > (i.e. no ptcblas and ptf77blas) I actually thought our ATLAS libs /were/ multithreaded, i.e. ATLAS did automatically build multithreaded libs if POSIX threads are available. There are just no

[sage-devel] ARM port (again)

I tried to answer to the post of the arm port, but i am not sure why i can't. I am considering buying an asus eeepad transformer prime. So i would like to compile sage on it. What are the changes that need to be done to the source code to do it?. Is there somewhere a tarball with the code alread

Re: [sage-devel] multithreded Atlas?

On Friday, March 23, 2012, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > Currently Sage ships only single-threaded Atlas libraries. > (i.e. no ptcblas and ptf77blas) > What is the reason behind this? Nobody got around to it. Seriously, that is the only reason. Back at sage days 9, mabshoff and Clement Pernet demo'd

[sage-devel] multithreded Atlas?

Currently Sage ships only single-threaded Atlas libraries. (i.e. no ptcblas and ptf77blas) What is the reason behind this? Over at sage-support there was a question about installing in Sage a Python package that uses these libraries. Thanks, Dima -- To post to this group, send an email to sage

[sage-devel] Re: Installation of sage-4.8 failed in ubuntu 10.04

On 23 Mrz., 17:22, leif wrote: > On 23 Mrz., 16:16, AD wrote: > > > RuntimeError: Unable to start gap because the command 'gap -r -b -p -T -o > > 3900m /home/anupam/sage-4.8/data//extcode/gap/sage.g' failed. > > This is one of the errors you get if the PExpect interfaces don't > work, i.e., /dev/

[sage-devel] Re: Installation of sage-4.8 failed in ubuntu 10.04

On 23 Mrz., 16:16, AD wrote: > RuntimeError: Unable to start gap because the command 'gap -r -b -p -T -o > 3900m /home/anupam/sage-4.8/data//extcode/gap/sage.g' failed. This is one of the errors you get if the PExpect interfaces don't work, i.e., /dev/pts is not (or improperly) mounted. (Running

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Installation of sage-4.8 failed in ubuntu 10.04

I have posted this question in ubuntu forum also and waiting for reply. AD -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Installation of sage-4.8 failed in ubuntu 10.04

Le vendredi 23 mars, AD a écrit: > > Thanks for your detailed answer. However my problem is not yet > solved. I noticed that by using the command > sudo mount -v -o remount,rw /dev/shm > I got the desired result (so that response of "mount | grep shm" is > "tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw)"); u

[sage-devel] Re: Installation of sage-4.8 failed in ubuntu 10.04

Thanks for your detailed answer. However my problem is not yet solved. I noticed that by using the command sudo mount -v -o remount,rw /dev/shm I got the desired result (so that response of "mount | grep shm" is "tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw)"); unfortunately this modification goes away on

Re: [sage-devel] Experimental Trac Server

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:40:33PM -0700, David Roe wrote: >If you have suggestions for plugins to enable, suggest theme here. I've >scanned through http://trac-hacks.org/ for useful looking plugins and >listed them at http://wiki.sagemath.org/review2/Projects. I have been dreaming fo

[sage-devel] [s...@fermigier.com: Re: Sage]

Hello, Stefane Fermigier pointed me to: http://forge.scilab.org/index.php/p/sciscipy/page/Tutorial/ Anyone interested in building a Sage interface to Scilab based on that? Basically all that would be needed is to make a (trivial) spkg of sciscipy, and maybe wrap a bit the interface t

[sage-devel] Re: Installation of sage-4.8 failed in ubuntu 10.04

On 23 Mrz., 12:37, AD wrote: > 1. The result of ls -ld /dev/shm/  is: > > drwxrwxrwt 2 root root 40 2012-03-23 16:57 /dev/shm/ That's strange, as the error message in your first post suggests it wasn't writable (by ordinary users). What does $ mount | grep shm give? In case it is mounted read

[sage-devel] Re: Math typesetting for inputs in the notebook

On Mar 23, 1:06 am, rjf wrote: >  I assume the idea is to use selecting from menus/palettes, since that > is the > alternative to keyboard input in Mathematica. > > I know of no evidence that this makes it easier (or faster) to input > long and > complicated expressions. Do you? Maple made a bi

[sage-devel] Re: Installation of sage-4.8 failed in ubuntu 10.04

Thanks a lot for your attention. I have tried to follow your suggestion but again there are problems. 1. The result of ls -ld /dev/shm/ is: drwxrwxrwt 2 root root 40 2012-03-23 16:57 /dev/shm/ 2. I ran the python script (as ordinary user, not superuser) you suggested; the response was: Err

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Experimental Trac Server

Cool. Things should be working now: you should be able to create a ticket on experimental without getting the error. David On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 01:10, Jason Grout wrote: > On 3/23/12 4:01 AM, David Roe wrote: > >> Yeah, we're messing with Code Comments. Did you get that failure on >> experim

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Experimental Trac Server

hopefully we fixed this, the plugin we were working with was written for svn On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 01:01, David Roe wrote: > Yeah, we're messing with Code Comments.  Did you get that failure on > experimental, or on sage_trac? > David > > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 00:52, Jason Grout > wrote: >

[sage-devel] Re: Experimental Trac Server

On 3/23/12 4:01 AM, David Roe wrote: Yeah, we're messing with Code Comments. Did you get that failure on experimental, or on sage_trac? Experimental. Apparently the issue was still created, though, as it shows up. Jason -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.c

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Experimental Trac Server

Yeah, we're messing with Code Comments. Did you get that failure on experimental, or on sage_trac? David On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 00:52, Jason Grout wrote: > On 3/23/12 2:40 AM, David Roe wrote: > >> Andrew Ohana and I have created >> http://trac.sagemath.org/**experimental/

[sage-devel] Re: Experimental Trac Server

On 3/23/12 2:40 AM, David Roe wrote: Andrew Ohana and I have created http://trac.sagemath.org/experimental/ I just tried creating a ticket and got this error: ProgrammingError: column "code_comment_relation" does not exist LINE 1: ...ROM ticket_custom WHERE ticket = 12733 AND name = "code_com