On Sunday, 11 March 2012 13:21:33 UTC+8, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.support, you wrote:
> > --Apple-Mail-6-908507845
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >
> > I want to install the visualization toolkit vtk into my sage on OS X
> 10.6.8. I am running
In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.support, you wrote:
> --Apple-Mail-6-908507845
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> I want to install the visualization toolkit vtk into my sage on OS X 10.6.8.
> I am running sage 4.8.
>
> Attempting to follow the instructions on
> http://www.sagemath
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 7:56 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Interesting examples:
>
> * Matplotlib doesn't support Python 3.x at all yet.
The released version of mpl doesn't, but all the py3 branch has
already been merged into git master. I haven't used it extensively,
but in light testing with
On 03/10/12 06:27 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Saturday, March 10, 2012, David Kirkby wrote:
On 10 March 2012 13:53, rjf wrote:
If you want a free open-source implementation of the language (without
most
of the mathematical commands)
you can use the one I wrote in Lisp. Mock MMA..
It is n
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 08:23:58 William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
> > William Stein writes:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Have you ever wondered how difficult it might be to switch Sage from
> >> Python 2.7 to Python 3.x? Some students in my course made a webpage
> >>
On Saturday, March 10, 2012, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 10 March 2012 13:53, rjf wrote:
>>
>> If you want a free open-source implementation of the language (without
most
>> of the mathematical commands)
>> you can use the one I wrote in Lisp. Mock MMA..
>>
>> It is not a simple language. One does
On 10 March 2012 13:53, rjf wrote:
>
> If you want a free open-source implementation of the language (without most
> of the mathematical commands)
> you can use the one I wrote in Lisp. Mock MMA..
>
> It is not a simple language. One does not often start with a complicated
> language and add to
On 03/04/2012 07:12 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
simplify
...
2. We can replace the existing simplify with,
simplify_factorial ->
simplify_trig ->
simplify_rational ->
simplify_log
which seem to be safe in practice. I like this, because it does actually
try to simplif
On 03/10/2012 11:01 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
Michael Orlitzky writes:
Did we ever get :trac:, :ticket:, or something similar?
Yup - http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12490 was merged in
5.0.beta4.
Sweet, I tried it before asking but forgot the backticks. Looks good.
--
To post to thi
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
> William Stein writes:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Have you ever wondered how difficult it might be to switch Sage from
>> Python 2.7 to Python 3.x? Some students in my course made a webpage
>> that summarizes the Python 3 support status of the Python packag
William Stein writes:
> Hi,
>
> Have you ever wondered how difficult it might be to switch Sage from
> Python 2.7 to Python 3.x? Some students in my course made a webpage
> that summarizes the Python 3 support status of the Python packages
> that Sage depends on:
>
> http://wstein.org/edu/2
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> On 3/10/12 9:56 AM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Have you ever wondered how difficult it might be to switch Sage from
>> Python 2.7 to Python 3.x? Some students in my course made a webpage
>> that summarizes the Python 3 support status
On 3/10/12 9:56 AM, William Stein wrote:
Hi,
Have you ever wondered how difficult it might be to switch Sage from
Python 2.7 to Python 3.x? Some students in my course made a webpage
that summarizes the Python 3 support status of the Python packages
that Sage depends on:
http://wstein.or
Michael Orlitzky writes:
> Did we ever get :trac:, :ticket:, or something similar?
Yup - http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12490 was merged in
5.0.beta4.
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To u
William Stein writes:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Keshav Kini wrote:
>> Jeroen Demeyer writes:
>>> On 2012-03-09 15:48, Keshav Kini wrote:
I'm probably missing something obvious, but why do you need a repository
in order to apply a patch to files? Doesn't `patch` work fine?
>>>
Hi,
Have you ever wondered how difficult it might be to switch Sage from
Python 2.7 to Python 3.x? Some students in my course made a webpage
that summarizes the Python 3 support status of the Python packages
that Sage depends on:
http://wstein.org/edu/2012/1062/projects/final/miloshevich-n
Did we ever get :trac:, :ticket:, or something similar?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
On 03/10/2012 08:32 AM, rjf wrote:
You pretty much are missing the boat on what to do here.
You seem to think you are constrained to return something that Maxima
returns, and simultaneously think that you are building some kind of new
mathematical "correct" system.
There are two branches to the
Le samedi 10 mars, William Stein a écrit:
> I would like to make this change sometime in the next few months. If
> anybody has any thoughts, feel free to share.
You already had my mind with your explanations, but the "reduce the use
of disk space by several hundred megabytes" totally stole my hea
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Keshav Kini wrote:
> Jeroen Demeyer writes:
>> On 2012-03-09 15:48, Keshav Kini wrote:
>>> I'm probably missing something obvious, but why do you need a repository
>>> in order to apply a patch to files? Doesn't `patch` work fine?
>>
>> We need the repository for
If you want a free open-source implementation of the language (without most
of the mathematical commands)
you can use the one I wrote in Lisp. Mock MMA..
It is not a simple language. One does not often start with a complicated
language and add to it and make
it simpler.
RJF
On Monday, March
You pretty much are missing the boat on what to do here.
You seem to think you are constrained to return something that Maxima
returns, and simultaneously think that you are building some kind of new
mathematical "correct" system.
There are two branches to the square root. If you want to repres
22 matches
Mail list logo
