> Until SPKGs are possible to uninstall or
> downgrade effectively, that is impractical.
Not really. For Sage purposes, downgrading a spkg is exactly the same
as upgrading a spkg. It's not like we sort package versions or
anything, we only check for equality.
--
To post to this group, send an e
On 03/ 6/12 03:50 AM, kcrisman wrote:
Perhaps slightly OT, but see the very first question (one I've been
wondering for a while) about open-sourcing early Mma versions:
http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/qisot/im_stephen_wolfram_mathematica_nks_wolframalpha/
Thanks for the link. I like th
Oops, Jeroen has released 5.0.beta7 since I started writing the above
mail. So I can revise the figures...
fs@boone ~/src/sagelib $ git rev-list
upstream/prerelease-5.0.beta7..upstream/prerelease-5.0.beta4 | wc -l
143
fs@boone ~/src/sagelib $ git rev-list
upstream/prerelease-5.0.beta4..upstream/
Hi Jeroen,
If I understand correctly, your reasoning for basing new development
releases on the previous stable release rather than the previous
development release is that sometimes a ticket may be merged into a
development release but then need to be removed from a subsequent
development release
Perhaps slightly OT, but see the very first question (one I've been
wondering for a while) about open-sourcing early Mma versions:
http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/qisot/im_stephen_wolfram_mathematica_nks_wolframalpha/
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
T
Well, I don't see what goes wrong there (except that the compiler you
use is so outdated that surely Sage is not tested with it --- version
alone does not say this, as the same version on MacOSX is a different
beast). You mention "people talking about this error on Lion".
Any links to any posts/for
The official website for Sage Days 38 is now live, through which you
can register and request financial support. So register soon!
Sage Days 38
CRM, Montreal, May 7--11, 2012
Official webpage: http://www.crm.umontreal.ca/2012/Sage12/index_e.php
Wiki page: http://wiki.sagemath.org/d
Hi Dox,
I would love for more representation theory to be available in Sage. I
think what you are doing is already implemented (in a different form).
See the Thematic Tutorial called "Lie Methods and Related
Combinatorics in Sage" [1]. In particular, enumerating the irreducible
representations (by
On 03/04/12 20:16, François Bissey wrote:
>
> this is python, you would want to get familliar with setup.py.
> I think it is a great deal to overwrite the content of your prefix system.
> First, all promises about safe upgrades without any (dangerous) left overs
> are off!
>
> That's my top co
When you say "computing the irreps", it is not clear what it is about the
irreps you are computing. I guess it is the dimension?
On Monday, 5 March 2012 10:50:20 UTC, Dox wrote:
>
> Dear all,
> a couple of weeks ago I wrote a small program for computing the irreps
> of a Lie group,
> http://sa
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:27 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
> Robert Bradshaw writes:
>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
>>> Robert Bradshaw writes:
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
> I would actually like the patchbot to NOT do continuous builds and
>
Dear all,
a couple of weeks ago I wrote a small program for computing the irreps
of a Lie group,
http://sagenb.org/home/pub/4395/
I'd like to help implementing it for future versions of SAGE...
However, I guess it needs a lot of work for the sake of optimization.
* Could you help me optimize it?
Dear Maria,
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Maria Bras Amoros wrote:
> I contacted Jordi Guàrdia from UPC (Technical University of Catalonia) for
> the review. What kind of review do you need? Is it more a tecnical review or
> a linguistics review?
Maybe I should clarify why your document would
Robert Bradshaw writes:
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
>> Robert Bradshaw writes:
>>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
I would actually like the patchbot to NOT do continuous builds and
tests, once we move to a push/pull system. There should be
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 3:48 AM, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
>
> On Mar 4, 2012 3:12 AM, "Robert Bradshaw"
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 3:21 PM, R. Andrew Ohana
>> wrote:
>> > I've created a repo on github: github.com/ohanar/sagescripts
>> >
>> > Much of the backbone has been setup, although
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
> Robert Bradshaw writes:
>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
>>> I would actually like the patchbot to NOT do continuous builds and
>>> tests, once we move to a push/pull system. There should be a big button
>>> on each ticket
What is the status at the moment?
Daniel
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://ww
Great, thank you for clarifying. I will do that as soon as I can. And
thanks for your speedy responses.
On Mar 4, 11:06 pm, Volker Braun wrote:
> You should send a polite email to your system admin requesting that
>
> a) the computer you are using and/or the file server have their clocks
> synch
18 matches
Mail list logo
